Skip to comments.Obama's long-form birth certificate debunked - with illustrations
Posted on 05/01/2011 6:45:48 AM PDT by eastexsteve
Bear with me, as I am rather new to this forum. The following is my unbiased examination of the Obama LFBC without any comment or input from outside sources. I'm sure others have made some of the same observations I have, but I assembled some observations that you can see yourself without using any specialized software whatsoever. I haven't seen some of these observations out on the web by anyone else yet. (Although, I'm sure I haven't looked everywhere.) Please feel free to copy the file from Google Docs and do what you wish with it.
What’s the Global National Review?
Did you manage to get the screenshots? Waiting, waiting, waiting.
I tried printing all the pages out to rescan as a jpg, but the white pages were blank on the printout. Did anyone else try this?
Here is another very simple explanation that any non-expert can easily understand, this should be posted on threads as even *I* can understand it, therefore anyone can.
I have been following this thread since day one. Most of the time I just lurk, but I have made an interesting discovery of some type...
I realize that the current discussion has moved on to daddy O and his life of mendacity, but I have been stuck on the new OB II COLB. Since you guys were hot on this a few days, I thought maybe what I have learned could be valuable.
The defenders of the COLB say that the layers have to do with scanners and OCR software arbitrarily separating things into layers. The newsies seem to be happy with that explanation. But, I have been looking for a reason this happens with this COLB. Here is what I have discovered.
Irrefutable proof of cut and paste assembly.
There are three types of text, pre-printed, typewritten, and ink stamped. And, then there are the pre-printed graphics. One would expect that the pre-printed graphics would be the same color as the preprinted text. One would expect the typewritten text somewhat different. And one would expect the ink stamps to be different again, and different from each other.
I have found that most of the pre-printed text matches the typewritten text, instead of the pre-printed graphics. OOPS! Also, The record number that is inkstamped, matches exactly to the typewritten and pre-printed text, EXCEPT for the last 1 which is a different color. So, we are supposed to believe that an ink stamp, or ink pad would make two different colors in one motion? The date accepted stamps are even stranger. The stamp in box 22 has two colors also, the 19 and the 1 at the end are different from the rest of it. The stamp in box 20 has identical digits to the stamp in box 22, but it has two colors also. But, not the same two as in box 22. So, here we are supposed to believe that one ink stamp can print two colors on a single motion, and two different set of two on the next motion.
Some other findings... Stanleys signature is half one color and half another color. Part of the K in U K L Lee is the wrong color. The check boxes down to 6d are one color and the ones belox are another color. There are at least three different colors of ink in the Doctors check box.
None of the inconstancy is random, not one letter, number or line is partially one color and partially another. Only whole characters are the wrong color.
If you would like to verify what I see, try this. Open the COLB with Photoshop. Select Enhance, Adjust color, replace color. Click on one of the triangles next to the signatures and replace that color with something bright and distinctive. Take a look at what portions of the doc are still black. Repeat this procedure to replace the colors of various parts of the COLB with an assortment of distinctive colors. When you get to a point where there are no more black caricatures, you are ready to analyze the results. What this process does is emphasize the subtle differences in the printed colors.
You will notice that there are numerous. You will see that I have not begun to cover them all here.
1,977 posted on Sunday, May 01, 2011 8:05:16 AM by California VWRC Member
I have no idea........
Would it make it better if they were from the WH?
I doubt if the State of HI stamp actually has an “X” instead of an “H” in one of the words.
Maybe you should stick to your regular forum.
At this point the State of HI, the fedgov and the media are partners in crime.
snip-Perhaps its a good thing that the U.S. Senate didnt take up a resolution on Barack Obamas status as a natural born Citizen in 2008 as members did for GOP candidate Sen. John McCain while both were seeking the U.S. presidency.
The Democrat might not have qualified under the requirements the Senate, including Obama, a co-sponsor and then-senator, put in the resolution, including the demand that the candidate have American citizen parents.
As I posted in another thread, I think that is a plea for help from Onaka. He wants to get off this Kenyan-Russian roulette wheel. Lol
screenshots are here
A plea for help. LOL!
No bother at all, NGZ. I have been distracted a bit today.
lj, do me a favor. try to print out the last page, #5 on the linked docs. see if it prints.
Sorry, MM - I have no printer. :-(
Hub has one but he’s at work.
Suggest you email this to World Net Daily..
That’s not surprising. Google doesn’t want to be called guilty of censorship but things like that have a habit of disappearing over there.
They are a gang of libs, so I am not surprised.
Hopefully, somebody saved the info and has it on their hard drivein anticipation of just such a thing happening.
If you get hold of such a thing, email it to me please (on my contact page)
LJ, I hope before I die I can figure out just what it is about socialists like Hussein that so mesmerizes media people and Beltway types that they are willing to flush their integrity-—and critical thinking-—right down the toilet.
What do they think he will do for them? Unlimited abortion? Unlimited sodomy, Frisco-style? Guarantee imaginary Republican “censorship” and “fascist oppression” will not take place?
It’s hard to understand why they sell themselves out so cheap.
So far, I am leaning toward your “Plain evil and lies” theory. Bad people doing devilish things taking over society.
Ve vill keep after zis until ze case is sol-ved.
Do you have any theory why Obama ordered a copy of his long form birth certificate in the first place?
Did he never have one, and this one was the first one he ever had?
If he had one, did he simply lose it? People lose birth certificates all the time, but it just seems strange to me that the President of the United States lost his. Was he just careless, or did another family member accidentally throw it away?
If he lost his copy, when did he lose it?
June 2007: Date stamped on back of Obama's short form we see at the FactCheck site.
Does the FactCheck short form mean that Obama lost his long form copy in 2007 or earlier, because most people don't go to the trouble of ordering a new copy of their birth certificate unless they lost theirs.
At the April 27, 2011 press conference where Obama showed us his long form birth certificate, I wish reporters would have asked Obama (1) why he needed to order a copy of his long form birth certificate, and (2) did he lose the one he used to have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.