Posted on 05/05/2011 5:22:36 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
You forgot the gratuitous insult.
Otherwise, you seem to be working at cross-purposes to the NBC birthers. The current official Hawaiian birth certificates support their cause.
“You forgot the gratuitous insult.”
That’s rich coming from the guy who posted a gratuitous insult in the very first post.
Thanks for your insincere concern.
I know your intention is to try to confuse the issue and divide the topic and since you’ve been posting on these threads for years you are quite familiar with all aspect of this topic.
Your feigned ignorance is not worthy of my time.
“Txe COLB has txe official stamp of Hawaii that says txe COLB is a real copy or abstract. Don’t know which it is, but txe stamp says it’s txe real deal.”
That’s brilliant. LOL
“Txe official signature stamp isn’t even valid.”
Txat appears to be correct! LOL
I still have not see how txe "layers" were produced on Obama's alleged BC by Adobe Illustrator. The Dems should be able to back engineer txe exact same layers we see by the "optimization" feature in txe Adobe Illustrator on txe same Hawaiian birth certificate form. That has not happened because it's BS.
There is no providence to prove that the COLB that Hussein and his WH has and copied from, came from the Hawaii Health Department.
Not FedEx, not NextDay UPS, not NextDay USPS but a private courier (not a Ford Courier but a lawyer) delivered the said document(s) to Hussein O.
Some software to create PDF documents from a scan will convert high-contrast black and white parts to bitonal graphics, continuous-tone monochromatic parts to grayscale graphics, and other parts to color graphics. This can be a good thing for a scan that has e.g. a small color photo in the middle of what's otherwise a text document. Software might also notice that certain graphic elements are essentially identical and replace the later instances with references to the first one.
If one had an uncompressed graphics file of a scanned document and it exhibited the anomalies present in the Obama PDF, those anomalies would be substantial evidence of forgery. In a compressed PDF, however, all they show is that the document was not formatted in such a way as to permit meaningful forensic analysis.
What you are likely to get back is deafening silence. That’s what I get when I contact my representatives on the federal and state levels.
I insulted the content, not the poster.
6:25:12 - 6:22:39 = 2 minutes and 33 seconds!
Wow! You must just sit and wait for these threads.
1.To me, the conspicuous silence on the part of Kapiolani Hospital in not commenting on the recent release of Obama's long form birth certificate and in not allowing reporters to look at Obama'a mother's Aug. 4, 1961 records are also important keys to proving whether or not Obama's long form birth certificate is authentic.
2. For instance, if from today until election day Nov. 2012, Kapiolani Hospital and Obama don't allow reporters to examine Obama's mother's records from Aug. 1961---election day Nov. 2012 is a very long year and a half away---then I say that Kapiolani and Obama are trying to hide something, and that something could be that Obama was not born at Kapiolani as he claims.
3. NOTE: Some people on the internet claim that Kapiolani Hospital cannot even release 1961 hospital records of deceased Stanley Ann Dunham Obama/Soetoro to her own son---who happens to be the President of the United States of America---because of new very strict medical privacy laws.
4. I find such a claim absurd.
5. For instance, are these people telling me that if Obama---the President of the United States of America---walked into Kapiolani Hospital tomorrow with a group of high-priced lawyer and demanded to see his deceased mother's records under threat of a very expensive lawsuit, that Kapiolani officials would tell Obama to his face that federal privacy laws prohibit him and anyone else from ever looking at Obama's mother's hospital records, because she is now deceased and she would have been the only person in the world who could have given permission to release her records.
To me, such a statement is absurd.
6. So if Kapiolani Hospital and Obama do not allow reporters to look at Obama's mother's records between today and election day Nov. 2012, I could only conclude that the reason that Kapiolani would NOT release Obama's mother's records to the public is that there were never any Stanley Ann Dumham Obama records for Aug. 4, 1961 to begin with.
7. So an important key to resolving Obama's long form birth certificate controversy is finding out if Kapiolani Hospital will ever be forced to release Obama's mother's August 4, 1961 records, the day that Obama claims that he was born at Kapiolani Hospital.
I call them “The Believers!”
Cue the Monkees’ song: “I'm a Believer!”
Then I saw Barry's face, now I'm a believer
Not a trace of doubt in my mind
I'm in love, I'm a believer
I couldn't leave him if I tried
“I insulted the content, not the poster.”
Tsk, tsk...
You after-birthers get so nasty when you’re called out on your trolling.
It is absurd since the **baby** has a medical record, too! Even if it were true that Stanley Ann's records were off-limits, Obama would have records of being a baby there.
I that is where you set the bar for a
nasty post’, you might need to get out more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.