Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: hinckley buzzard
Sarah has said all along that she would decide about running based on the field. If there is a good strong conservative candidate then she will not run.

Well, what's stopping her from being the solid conservative candidate? Is it the stupid endorsement/campaigning for McCain against Hayworth? She's not running. A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

3 posted on 05/18/2011 7:43:39 PM PDT by Carling (Obama: Inexperienced and incompetent, yet ego maniacal. God help us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Carling
Well, what's stopping her from being the solid conservative candidate? Is it the stupid endorsement/campaigning for McCain against Hayworth? She's not running. A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

She is a loyal person and McCain begged for his last election.

His girlfrind will never win a election in South Carolina. Leslie Graham.

5 posted on 05/18/2011 7:45:41 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

“A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on. “

One thing you can say about her is that she never does the expected. And it usually works out quite well for her.


6 posted on 05/18/2011 7:47:03 PM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

Yeah, Reagan was another crumb-chewing slacker. He didn't announce his candidacy until November 13, 1979.

17 posted on 05/18/2011 8:01:10 PM PDT by AHerald ("Behold, your mother." And from that hour the disciple took her into his home -- John 19:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

Hayworth had as much of a chance of winning as you did, with or without Sarah Palin. What a fool.


19 posted on 05/18/2011 8:02:09 PM PDT by curth (Organize4Palin.com - NOW IS THE TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
A leader would get ahead of the field

When you're Secretariat you can wait a while. Or do you think Reagan was not a leader for waiting until November of 1979 to declare his candidacy?

21 posted on 05/18/2011 8:07:09 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

It would be stupid for Sarah Palin to dart out there now. It’s going to take a HUGE war chest to combat the Obamajad machine. And Obamajad knows this, that’s why he came out swinging early, to lure republicans out early and they’ll start eating up their campaign funds way before the whistle blows to start the game. And why would she give the idiots in the lame stream media cause to start beating up on her now? She has them so desperately scared right now, that their panties are being eaten up into their behinds! The longer she holds out, there’s not a damned thing they can do.

Sarah Palin is a brilliant strategist. Why would she come out this early and start expending campaign money, when people are willing to pay her for speaking engagements and she can speak every day and get her word out while making money. She’s already a household name and certainly doesn’t need name recognition.

NO, it’s not her support of McCain...that was another piece of brilliant strategy. She now owes McCain NOTHING and has him backed into a corner...as well as Godess Graham. And I’d be willing to bet she got some campaign money pledged out of both of them.

You nay sayers need to keep your shorts on and let this wise woman get her own GAME ON! You need to remember that she damn near vanquished Obamajad in 2008 before dumbarse McCain ran back to support the TARP bill. And she damn near vanquished Obamajad’s health care reform with two words, ‘death panels’.


22 posted on 05/18/2011 8:09:49 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
Well, what's stopping her from being the solid conservative candidate?

Ridiculous premise.

Is it the stupid endorsement/campaigning for McCain against Hayworth?

Total water under the bridge. Yesterday's garbage.

She's not running.

She has volunteers already on the ground for her, and she continues to receive high-level briefings.

A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

What the Hell do you think she's been doing for the last 2 years? She has been out front attacking Obama and has given numerous interviews and in-depth policy speeches, while the other candidates stuck their fingers in the winds and watched their poll numbers.

Sheesh

27 posted on 05/18/2011 8:54:35 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
Also another thing is that Sarah is very competitive and has openly said she could beat Obama in a race.

The interview pertained to running, but smart people knew what she was talking about. The moment Sarah mocked Obama about the styrofoam columns in her acceptance speech completely knocked the wind out of Obama and the Left...

Sarah is the only Republican candidate who can beat Obama. She will not play games or try to be Obama's friends or joke with him. She and her family was character assassinated for the last 2.5 and almost driven to personal ruin and bankruptcy. She's running, $100 donation to FR against anyone who doubts me.

28 posted on 05/18/2011 9:00:50 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
"A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on."

Really, genius? Well this leader (Sarah Palin) knows a little more about winning elections than you do. Your preposterous mischaracterizations of everything you reference in your snivelling PDS blatt prove only that your opinions are driven your lack of knowledge about Sarah's well-established history of multiple unconventional, winning election strategies.

I'll bet eight bucks you eat your boogers. Tell the truth now...

9^D

32 posted on 05/18/2011 9:11:45 PM PDT by Gargantua (Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

Apparently, you’ve not been paying attention.

Either that, or you choose not to see.


34 posted on 05/18/2011 9:17:55 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

Um, a gentleman named Ronald Reagan ignored that advice, didn't announce for the 1980 campaign until November of 1979, and things worked out pretty well for him.

47 posted on 05/19/2011 1:31:30 AM PDT by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
Well, what's stopping her from being the solid conservative candidate? Is it the stupid endorsement/campaigning for McCain against Hayworth? She's not running. A leader would get ahead of the field, instead of waiting out the game to see what crumbs are left to chew on.

Says who, you?

Smart people don't listen to people with mental disorders.

PDS qualifies.
57 posted on 05/19/2011 9:31:55 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carling
A real leader would not jump into the fray too early either. She'd call her shots and make everyone else react to her timing instead of the other way around.

Remember, if she jumps in too early, the media will run it 24x7. There is a popularity peak curve that needs to be timed to coincide with the various Primaries.

It is STILL too early for candidates to be declaring. Look what happened to Newt and Donald already.

58 posted on 05/19/2011 9:37:01 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson