Skip to comments.Subpoena Issued for Loretta Fuddy, Director of Hawaii Department of Health
Posted on 05/24/2011 12:54:31 PM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Did Uk La Lee also get subpoenaed?
Awesome! It ain’t gonna happen though.
The plot thickens .....
... and further more Ms. Fuddy, if you do NOT show up at the aforementioned time and place WITH the documents we will send you another suboena but this will be all in caps and bold font
Why wouldn’t it be produced? It’s already public right?
I have a great feeling about this one. I just can’t wait until June 27 when Obama will finally be exposed in front of a court of law.
Orly will guide us through the darkness and to the light of a post Obama America.
I thought a subpoena had to be issued by a court. This seems to be issued by Orly Taitz herself.
I would guess no. If it were already public, they wouldn't be playing games with it.
I hope the PDF is shown to her, and she is forced, under oath, to state whether that was the document she stamped and certified in Hawaii.
And if it is NOT, we need an explanation for what Barry showed us.
Say what you will about Orly...one thing is certain...she is tenacious.
What is posted at that link is a request for a subpoena with no judge signature, only Orly’s request and a denial letter from the state. Not what the article implies.
If Orly is guiding you, you’d better be very afraid.
Fukino said the original was half-typed, half handwritten. This loosely corresponds to what Abercrombie found, when he said there is ‘something actually written down, a notation’.
No problem. She will just ignore the subpoena.
...No problem. She will just ignore the subpoena....
That would be a mistake.
The subpoena was issued after the denial by smiley face Onaka.
Normally that would be a good thing, but she is in the tin foil hat club. She believes in the FEMA concentration camps and that Big Pharma is going to poison us with Avian Flu among other gems. This mindless, worthless subpoena just adds to the list of odd things she's done. The good Doctor make the Birth issue look looney.
guess again...attorneys issue subpoenas all the time..it of course can be quashed for good reason...
..and the letter on the first page says clearly the request is denied.
a subpoena is not a request...check the dates
Yep, and hereby Subpoena Orly to present herself here so I can take her out to dinner.
Don’t mean anything by it, I just think she would be very interesting to spend a night with.
no...no! evening! to spend an evening with...
Such dirty minds..
this is GREAT NEWS!
The subpoena is coming from the court where this case is being heard...
Thanks for clarifying that, HM. It sounds like the real deal—go Orly!
Usually the attorney requesting the person to appear issues the subpoena. The person subpoenaed can file a motion to quash.
Court rules may permit lawyers to issue subpoenas themselves in their capacity as officers of the court. Typically subpoenas are issued "in blank" and it is the responsibility of the lawyer representing the plaintiff or defendant on whose behalf the testimony is to be given to serve the subpoena on the witness.
What I love most about this is if a motion to quash is filed after the information ‘supposedly’ (Obama’s LGBC) has already been released, its a huge red flag.
Why quash something that is already public information if the public information is truthful? If Obama’s LGBC is in fact genuine there should be no problems complying with the subpoena.
However, if the LGBC is fraudulent, there is every reason in the world to file a motion to quash. You would start to see panic like cockroaches caught in the light.
Therefore, if a motion to quash is filed it is highly likely the LGBC is in fact fake and the birthers have been right all along. This will be obvious to everyone except for the most ardent koolaid drinker who will never be convinced.
Forgot to add a Thanks for compelling me to look up the correct info!
I worked for attorneys for over 25 years but please don’t hold that against me! LOL
Wow! Another Israeli slapping the Won!
That lunatic cow can't even spell subpoena.
An objection from fuddy within 14 days on the basis of the HIPAA restrictions on releasing information could only be valid if the Hawaii DOH records are different from the WH disclosed LFBC. How could she make that case in a Federal court without admitting the WH LFBC is a forgery?
Squealing about the non redacted SSN may cause a delay, but if the judge is honest he will begin to suspect the extent of the corruption. A fraudulently used SSN belonging to a dead person is not protected - and a Connecticut prefix is impossible for Obama.
Some might even say she's amazing enough to catch the attention of the world-renowned playboy, Lazamataz. Your opinions may vary.
OK, who’s La Le and what does she have to do with the summons?
That’s because the defendants had until May 3 to respond...they did not.
maybe you are correct about Orly.
but, whether or not she is a lunatic, and can’t spell,
the fact remains, that Obama has a forged COLB, Selective Service Form, and LFBC. AND an impossible Connecticut SSN.
...i’m an ordinary American. nothing special. and before the LFBC was released, I actually believed he was born in Hawaii.
and it was actually people like you, who convinced me otherwise. i saw a lot of people here, ask honest questions, like WHY does he have a CT SSN. And people like you, El Sordo, and a bunch of others, swarmed them like sharks, ridiculed, and insulted them, just as you just did to Orly.
WHY? ...there are lots of people i think are lunatics. but i don’t waste my time insulting them. you do.
...and ALL of you, defend every detail of Obama. every new mystery of our “transparent” President, that good people here found. like the missing page 11 of the divorce papers, the missing kindergarden records, college information, etc. etc. yet NOTHING makes you curious, or open minded.
...almost as if you don’t care about anything, except protecting Obama. THAT is what finally convinced me, and made me do more research, and see what i believe is clear evidence of forgery and fraud, even to a non-techie like me.
...and a year from now, there are going to be MORE normal Americans like me, with honest questions. so, at least you have job security, unlike a few million other Americans.
Something was made public, though the validity is in question. Also, it’s a different story to introduce a fake document in court as opposed to posting it online.
Taitz wants them on record in a court case either standing behind this fake document or refusing to verify its authenticity.
Yep. She's looney. And has crazy taste in eye make-up.
WHY does he have a CT SSN
Does he? Or is this just some crap bandied about on the internet?
I don't know. Do you?
ALL of you, defend every detail of Obama
Well, I suppose you could dig through my 32,000 posts over
the last decade and find one that proves that statement.
I'd like to see it.
almost as if you dont care about anything, except protecting Obama.
Please point out where I have done that.
By the way, you should work on your punctuation and capitalization. You write like a ten-year-old.
Breaking News: Attorney Orly Taitz is reporting a subpoena
That lunatic cow can’t even spell subpoena.
We you can master spelling in 5 languages then you may be free to criticize...
If the BC issue will get rid of Obama, I am all for it. However, I don’t see how it will. If you do, please explain.
"WE YOU" is be spicking the English.
Oily can fail in the language of her choice, incompetence is universal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.