Terrorist, Dying America is a Tremendous Opportunity For U.S. Revolution: Bernardine Dohrn (video)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVRxrTwD_w8&feature=uploademail ^ | 5/29/11

[savagesusie]

You are right—that the public schools are nothing but indoctrination centers—I have seen the curricula and it is downright evil for it’s dumbing down content and subtle, and not so subtle, encouragement of dysfunctional behavior.

That is why I advocate all local control and parents only board—no unions— to design their own curricula—could (and should because our rights come from God) be God-centered. The parents of the actual children in the school decide—(We the People) It is the most fundamental and important right of all—to raise your own children and determine their worldview.

I am not against public schools, but only if the State and Federal government are left out of everything—even certifications, etc. Parents are the best ones to decide the education of their children. If there is public school there would have to be vouchers, but now with mosques we have a major problem with indoctrination centers since their teachings are to overthrow our Constitution.

Back to the original design when children never entered a classroom until age seven and we had the highest literary rates. Prior to age seven, mothers need to see that children have all sorts of experiences with real life situations and read to them copiously. The marriage model of stay at home mother should be encouraged over every other type of system of child care. Grandparent is ok substitute and next best thing.

Child care outside the home should be discouraged (as it always was) until the 70’s when the feminists started to destroy the family and patriarchy and government helped with no-fault divorce laws which made the marriage contract a piece of cr*p. Just what Lenin did and he established day cares so he controlled the worldview of the upcoming Communist nation... How wonderful for the minds of those little children and those mothers willingly gave up their children to be indoctrinated by the state .

[Fred Nerks]

That brilliant comment shouldn’t get lost, why not post it as a Vanity?

[Fred Nerks]

May 21, 2011
Media Shielded Voters from Obama’s Israel Intentions
Jack Cashill
When President Barack Obama publicly endorsed the Palestinian view of Israel’s future this week, he took many Americans, including many of his Jewish-American supporters, by surprise. Had the media been doing their job, he would not have surprised anyone.

In April 2008, Peter Wallsten of the Los Angeles Times wrote a lengthy article titled “Allies of Palestinians see a friend in Obama.” The article pulled some of its information from a video shot at a 2003 farewell dinner for Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian booster and a de facto spokesman for the PLO during his Beirut years. Khalidi, who had spent several years at the University of Chicago, was leaving for New York.

Domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn reportedly attended the dinner as well. This would make sense. Khalidi begins the acknowledgment section of his 2004 book, Resurrecting Empire, with a tribute to the guy who lived — and edited — in their neighborhood. “First, chronologically and in other ways,” writes Khalidi, “comes Bill Ayers.” Unlike the calculating Obama, Khalidi had no reason to be coy about this relationship.

At the dinner, Obama thanked Khalidi and his wife for the many meals they had shared chez Khalidi and for reminding Obama of “my own blind spots and my own biases.” Obama hoped that “we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid’s dinner table [...] [but around] this entire world.”

Wallsten acknowledged that during this “celebration of Palestinian culture,” some of the guests made hostile comments about Israel. One recited a poem accusing the Israeli government of terrorism with the implicit threat that Israel “will never see a day of peace.” Another compared “Zionist settlers on the West Bank” to Osama bin Laden. If worse had been said, or if Obama had applauded these comments, the world beyond the LA Times newsroom would not be allowed to know.

The Times, which endorsed Obama for president, steadfastly refused to share the videotape despite the demand by the McCain camp and others to release it. This was, of course, one of many clues to Obama’s character that the media either suppressed or refused to seek.

“A major news organization is intentionally suppressing information that could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi,” said McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb.

Times spokeswoman Nancy Sullivan blew Goldfarb off. “As far as we’re concerned, the story speaks for itself,” she responded. The Times would add no details beyond what had appeared in Wallsten’s April article. Obama, after all, had many affluent Jewish supporters in the Los Angeles area. Why worry them with a little anti-Israel rabble-rousing?

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/05/media_shielded_voters_from_oba.html