Posted on 06/03/2011 4:29:29 PM PDT by Nachum
Last week I posted on a clearly antisemitic piece of legislation in San Francisco and Santa Monica banning the Jewish religious tradition of circumcision. Judenrein in Sunny Southern California: Banning Male Circumcision.
America, this is getting very, very ugly. Male circumcision is significantly healthier with or without the important religious significance. The Islamic practice of female genital mutilation (cutting off the clitoris) is sick misogyny. To equate the two is officially legislating Jew-hatred.
Any doubt this was motivated by hatred and racism?
Zombie over at PJM: Proof that S.F.’s circumcision ban is anti-Semitic
As you may have heard by now, San Francisco will be voting this November on whether or not to ban circumcision in the city.
Defenders of the measure say it’s all about “human rights” and “protecting babies” from unnecessary procedures.
But critics suspected there was something vaguely anti-Semitic about the whole proposal, since among Jews (and Muslims, as well) circumcising male babies is a religious duty, not just a mistaken medical procedure.
Ban proponents insisted their proposal had nothing to do with Jews — really, it’s all about the rights of children.
Well, any doubt that they were lying have now been dispelled, with the publication of new campaign literature for the upcoming circumcision ban. The campaign comic book, called Foreskin Man, after its baby-saving superhero, features a litany of evil Jews doing battle with blonde Nordic saviors.
Yes, really.
(Oh, and did I mention the artist’s last name is Hess? A relative of Rudolph, perhaps?)
Below you will find a selection of images taken from Foreskin Man, the campaign brochure for San Francisco’s anti-circumcision ballot measure. You tell me: anti-Semitic or not?
(Excerpt) Read more at atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com ...
If you aren't aware of such things as the Hollywood use of Blond men as evil, then how did you echo it in your post?
Well we aren’t Europeans from the first half of the 20th century, we are Americans, what color hair is an American supposed to have not to be bad, or for you to not point it out in an illustration as sinister?
signed, a blonde American
By the way the guy in your old European poster looks like Kirk Douglas.
Quite a few other FReepers pointed out the Aryan vs. Jew thing seen in this comic book on this thread:
It is racist, that is why the left pushes that imagery of blond as evil, or in the case of females, stupid, vindictive, shallow, etc., as the native population of America started getting replaced in the last 45 years, that propaganda created prejudice emerged as a Hollywood and New York controlled media theme.
By the way, don’t take it personally, I just voiced my concerns to your post, but I didn’t mean to draw you into something that probably doesn’t interest you particularly, I was just posting thoughts on the topic that emerged from your post, they don’t really pertain to you.
Ok. :-)
Definitely. We agree. So do the rabbis.
Does the legislation impact moslems as well?
I’m sure babies have died being dunked in water for a Christening too. Are you going to ban that?,bR>
Somehow, I doubt it.
I do not want to see any babies die when it is so easily prevented.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.