Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why is Obama's name different on passport? Doesn't match birth records released
WND ^ | June 2, 2011 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/05/2011 5:26:11 PM PDT by opentalk

In this era of tight airport security, the Transportation Safety Administration typically will not allow a passenger to board an airplane if the name printed on the ticket differs from the way it appears on government-issued identification.

Now that the White House has released President Obama's purported long-form birth certificate, a question arises as to why the name on that document does not match the name on his State Department passport.

This matched how his name was listed on the short-form Certification of Live Birth released during the 2008 presidential campaign, as first presented by DailyKos.com June 12, 2008:

Below is a close-up screen-capture of Obama's passport taken from the White House website:

Note that Obama’s name on his passport is listed as "Barack Hussein Obama," without the "II" the Hawaii documents list to indicate Obama was named after his father.

As seen below, U.S. State Department passport regulations require first-time applicants to submit an embossed birth certificate, complete with registrar's stamp, that lists the applicant's full name.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government
KEYWORDS: 2012demandoriginals; abovealllaw; abovethelaw; americacares; anomaly; anotheranomaly; barakmounirubayd; barakobama11; barrysoetoro; bauer; bc; birthcertificated; birthers; certifigate; corruption; doj4soa; doj4theirpeople; dojasleep; eligibility; fraud; fraudulentrecords; identityfraud; noaccountability; noaccuracy; noamericanpassport; nobc; nobirthcertificate; noconstitution; nodocumentation; nofairness; nohonor; nointegrity; nojustice; nomoreamerica; noonecares; notransparency; notruth; noveritas; nwo; obama; obamapassport; socialsecurityfraud; soebarkah; soros; sorostool; usurper; wecare; whoisthisman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Cicero
Another anomaly on top of more anomalies, the whole thing starts to smell.

We just renewed our passports. They mailed original birth certificates along with the passport application. The name is identical to birth records. There is a II on one of the BC, same with the passport.

More anomalies from wnd article

Vogt's forensic examination of the birth certificate number on the White House-released long form concluded that the last "1" in the number "10641," as seen in the figure below, is a grayscale image, while the remaining numbers are not. This is, he says, "irrefutable proof that the certificate number is a composite of two numbers and hence a forgery."

... In Boxes 20 and 22 on the Obama long-form birth certificate, the stamps recording the date the local registrar and registrar general accepted the birth certificate have two different colors on both lines where there should be no color at all. Also, the color differences are evident in Box 22, both in the printed text of the box and in the stamp recording the date that the local registrar accepted the birth certificate, Vogt says, as seen below:


21 posted on 06/05/2011 5:57:20 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

I think you summed it up.


22 posted on 06/05/2011 5:59:25 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: opentalk

Assume the documents are accurate...

make them explain how a first generation American can be natural born if one of the parents was a foreign national at the time of his birth?

If this is legal, then anchor babies can be president

I am 100% certain this isn’t legal


24 posted on 06/05/2011 6:10:31 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

I always thought that II usually denoted a Jr’s Jr and so on. (III, IV etc.)


25 posted on 06/05/2011 6:16:29 PM PDT by Know et al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

If I am seeing this correctly, the birthdate is also different. Acoording to his birth certificate, he was born on Aug. 4. It appears to be Aug. 6th on the passport.

But I am visually impaired so cannot trust what I think I see.


26 posted on 06/05/2011 6:20:03 PM PDT by ruesrose (It's possible to be clueless without being blonde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruesrose
I see a 4 on the passport.(it is blurry) We really don't know for sure anything until the original validated records are released.
27 posted on 06/05/2011 6:25:23 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

He is ignorant on many things......however, I don’t believe he made the decision to name himself.


28 posted on 06/05/2011 6:53:47 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

It would be unusual if he had made the decision.

Parents do strange things when they name their children.


29 posted on 06/05/2011 7:10:28 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

What needs investigating is the Senate Judiciary Committee making SR 511 equal to the Constitution. Their work was used by the DNC to nominate Obama.


30 posted on 06/05/2011 7:29:26 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

So, your Social Security card doesn’t match your birth cerificate? Hmmm...I see...


31 posted on 06/05/2011 7:34:59 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Obviously, this Vogt has no clue. You can get the same thing yourself on a document if you try it.


32 posted on 06/05/2011 7:37:50 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

State-run, Lame-Stream Media’s response:
“Move along folks, nothing more to see here” . . .

CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, response: “This is a NON-story - it never had, and never will have, legs as long as we are in control of the news. Give us something on Romney, Palin, Huckabee, Gingrich, etc., we will send a team of investigators to check out the story”.


33 posted on 06/05/2011 7:42:25 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

First of all if he was named for his father he should be Junior, not II.

In any event I think all those things, Jr., Sr. II, III are not part of your official name, I think you can use or lose them as you wish.


34 posted on 06/06/2011 1:57:13 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Obviously, this Vogt has no clue. You can get the same thing yourself on a document if you try it.

Or maybe you're the one without a clue?

Why don't you knock yourself out and produce a messed up document like Bamie BC II. You can use this:

if you like. These are the ID pages from my expired Passports reproduced to match the Bamie BC II file size. (Of course Obama has no expired Passports that anyone knows about, but I'm sure that's a sore subject with you.)

ML/NJ

35 posted on 06/06/2011 4:48:29 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I remember this being brought up a year ago. It was a dumb argument then, and it’s a dumb argument now. Is Corsi really this desperate?


36 posted on 06/06/2011 5:26:08 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Send me the originals and I’ll scan with OCR on and it will likely do that, the same way it did to the documents I tried when the birth cerificate was finally released.

I’m not claiming to be an expert; I’m just going by seeing the same thing when I tried it. My guess is that it’s a difference between OCR’d/non-OCR’d or those that are lighter getting grayscale/antialiasing versus those that get mono handling.


37 posted on 06/06/2011 6:15:11 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Send me the originals and I’ll scan with OCR

Yeah. I'm going to send you my Passports. What schmucks you Obama flacks are!

If you knew anything about this, you would know that when you bring my jpg (Right click on it, and choose "Save Picture As" to get the file onto your WH machine.) into Acrobat, that is when it you can do an OCR scan if you want.

Have at it Sherlock, or please stop posting as if you knew what you are talking about on these threads.

ML/NJ

38 posted on 06/06/2011 8:32:26 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

>Obviously, this Vogt has no clue. You can get the same thing yourself on a document if you try it.<

I suggest that you examine the long form by using adobe pro.

Just “extract images” from the long form obama released and you will see that the differences shown are because there are 3 pictures that made the one document.

This does not happen when you scan one image as it was alleged by Obama. It is one image .. period. There are no jpg’s to extract.

Obama’s long form is made of three different jpg’s that were crafted in adobe and merged to appear as one document.
It is a complete forgery and the evidence is easily seen.


39 posted on 06/06/2011 10:01:06 AM PDT by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
More from WND link

Forged state registrar stamp?

Vogt concludes the state registrar's stamp certifying the Obama April 27 birth certificate is itself a forgery. He examined a legitimate stamp placed on a long-form birth certificate copy issued by the Hawaii DOH on March 15, 2011

As seen below, the registrar's stamp applied to Obama's April 27 birth certificate has an error in the word "THE" that reads instead "TXE." The error did not show up on the stamp used one month earlier.


40 posted on 06/06/2011 1:25:44 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson