Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

Well, you’re entitled to your opinion if you like it or not... but it simply wasn’t Star Trek. I also just plain don’t care for movies that give me motion sickness in the first 5 minutes. I hated that ghastly “Moulin Rouge” film, too. Vile.


48 posted on 06/12/2011 6:48:06 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

“not Star Trek” doesn’t mean it was bad filmmaking. I understand how that would upset fans though. But this is the new ST going foward.


49 posted on 06/12/2011 6:49:28 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

There you go again. It WAS Star Trek, it was more Trek than ANY of the Trek movies since 4 and more Trek than ANY of the shows since TAS. It was great fun SF with out stupid boring whining UN talk. And yes they failed to explain a bunch of stuff, just like TOS. That’s what made it so clearly and purely REAL Trek. Real Trek doesn’t drown in explanation, real Trek gets on with the story. It wasn’t canon worship, for which all the sane Trekkies jump up and down in joy.


53 posted on 06/12/2011 7:17:37 AM PDT by discostu (Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson