Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good news: Iran now offers a missile umbrella to fellow Muslim nations; UPDATE
Hot Air ^ | June 14, 2011 | J.E. Dyer

Posted on 06/14/2011 8:36:53 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Of course this was going to happen (h/t: “Reza Khalili”). The whole point of having theater missiles, for Iran, is being able to engage in deterrence. What Iran will protect under the missile umbrella is not peace, harmony, and light, but the nation-torturing activities of the paramilitary Qods Force and Iranian-backed terrorists like Hezbollah and Hamas.

This move puts Iran in the aspiring-nuclear-power category of the former USSR and China – not that of Britain, France, India, Pakistan, or North Korea. Iran is still in the “aspiring” stage, but has already revealed the scope of her ambitions for deterrence. The radical Islamic regime has no intention of merely deterring a single neighbor, maintaining its independence inside a foundational alliance, or even just brooding dementedly inside its borders. Revolutionary Iran aims to achieve regional dominance, and sees deterring the West as the first step.

Just to be clear, when Iran offers a missile umbrella to the Muslim nations of the Middle East, she means she can, and under certain circumstances will, launch missiles at the non-Muslim nations she can reach with her arsenal, which right now include Israel, Southeastern Europe, and Russia. When the joint missile base in Venezuela is completed, Iran will be able to reach the territory of the United States with her missiles. A secondary meaning is that Iran can threaten with missiles those Muslim nations that collaborate with the West (e.g., by hosting military forces), like Bahrain, Kuwait, and UAE.

The missile umbrella propounded by Larijani is precisely the form of deterrence employed by the Soviet Union in the Cold War. The Soviet deterrent – to which the Russians still, to this day, refer as their “strategic deterrent” – was used as an umbrella to give cover to the Soviet oppression of Eastern Europe, and to Soviet support of Marxist insurrections further abroad. It was a very successful deterrent, because it changed the most fundamental calculations of the United States about what was possible.

We took off the table, with NSC-68 in 1950, the possibility of doing anything so effective against Communist incursions abroad that it might incur a Soviet nuclear response. We constrained ourselves instead to accept losses of territory, half-measures, and unfinished business that we would not have thought necessary in the absence of a Soviet strategic deterrent. (I wrote more about this in February 2009, precisely apropos of Iran’s prospects for a nuclear deterrent.)

Our strategic deterrent did not deter the Soviets from supporting and fomenting Marxist insurgencies and civil wars in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The Soviets’ strategic deterrent did deter us, until the Reagan presidency, from pushing back decisively against those insurgent efforts. The latter is the lesson learned by Iran’s current leadership. Iran has revolutionary cadre making trouble abroad already; it’s the deterrent umbrella she has lacked. The Larijani statement has been made before the Iranian missile umbrella becomes a nuclear one – but that will come soon enough. We can’t say we didn’t see it coming.

*UPDATE* Daled Amos steps into the fray with an interesting twist.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: iran; nuclearweapons; obama; wot
Hope and change.
1 posted on 06/14/2011 8:37:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Ping.


2 posted on 06/14/2011 8:37:42 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When the joint missile base in Venezuela is completed, Iran will be able to reach the territory of the United States with her missiles

That missle base is a threat to the United States by not one, but two hostile states and should be blasted into dust - now.


3 posted on 06/14/2011 8:43:00 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (A communist is just a liberal in a hurry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I feel so protected now.


4 posted on 06/14/2011 8:43:14 PM PDT by ari-freedom (All we are saying....is give the military a chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

“That missle base is a threat to the United States by not one, but two hostile states and should be blasted into dust - now.”

yeah but if we do, Dennis kucinich will claim that it is in violation of the War Powers Act.


5 posted on 06/14/2011 8:44:48 PM PDT by ari-freedom (All we are saying....is give the military a chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

You are assuming Obama would drop the gloves for Iran... aint going to happen.

The caliphate he has been working towards would be disrupted.


6 posted on 06/14/2011 8:52:33 PM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: himno hero

I’m also assuming Obama won’t be re-elected so we can actually do something about Iran


7 posted on 06/14/2011 9:00:10 PM PDT by ari-freedom (All we are saying....is give the military a chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No doubt they’re going to ask for protection money.


8 posted on 06/14/2011 9:01:56 PM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

I think we are both praying that Iran doesn’t do anything in the meanwhile, which is highly improbable. Very unreasonable on our part. The trajectory is happening way too fast. How long till they are tipped up?


9 posted on 06/14/2011 9:10:34 PM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
"That missle base is a threat to the United States by not one, but two hostile states and should be blasted into dust - now. "

I disagree.

Wait until the very day it's operational. Allow them to expend enormous funds and political capital, then take it all out.

10 posted on 06/14/2011 9:11:09 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hmm. I’m not convinced. Let’s test it.


11 posted on 06/14/2011 9:16:55 PM PDT by andyk (Interstate <> Intrastate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Could be seen as a violaion of the Monroe Doctrine.


12 posted on 06/14/2011 9:29:30 PM PDT by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Oh great! They are starting a protection racket. I din’t know they got the Sopranos over in Iran.


13 posted on 06/14/2011 9:39:41 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andyk

One US Navy SSBN (Nuclear Ballistc Missile Submarine) with it’s 16 MIRVed missiles could destroy the ENTIRE Middle East. We have 18 such vessels.


14 posted on 06/14/2011 9:44:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("We didn't lose Vietnam. We quit Vietnam." ~Gen. Al Haig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
(I wrote more about this in February 2009, precisely apropos of Iran’s prospects for a nuclear deterrent.)

Don't have time right now to look for blog entries, but I do remember a few Iranian bloggers mentioned the concept of 'nuclear deterrent' and Iran back in 2006-2007. Actually, a couple insisted that is exactly what the Mullahs' regime has in mind & one of the key reasons they're developing nuclear capability.

Point is: if people like J.E. Dyer, Reza Khalili, and the rest of us know it, then you can bet your bottom dollar that Washington, Beijing, and Moscow have already known about it. Question is: Why hasn't anything been done about it? Or, has there? Well, apart from useless "sanctions".

Now compared the above to Iraq. Israel promptly bombed Saddam's (Iraq's) Osirak nuclear plant and nipped it in the bud. Later, we got rid of Saddam & his regime because we thought he had usable WMDs & of course we wanted to 'liberate' Iraq & Iraqis. So, what is & has been different with Mullahs' regime and Iranians?

15 posted on 06/14/2011 9:50:58 PM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah—hope and change in touchy feely, military policies for worldly trading partners for decades. The counter-culture punks were put in charge of the fortunes behind controlling constituencies a long time ago. The extents of their apathy toward their own fellow Americans will be realized soon enough.

Iran Placing Medium-Range Missiles in Venezuela; Can Reach the U.S.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2640111/posts


16 posted on 06/14/2011 9:52:39 PM PDT by familyop (Shut up, and eat your brains!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And this is good news, why?


17 posted on 06/14/2011 10:02:18 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

I think the “good news” in the title is sarcasm, don’t you?


18 posted on 06/14/2011 10:29:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("We didn't lose Vietnam. We quit Vietnam." ~Gen. Al Haig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent observation, excepting we have a alien in the White House who would rather use those vessels to defend Iran than attack it or redirect the American machine at Israel.


19 posted on 06/14/2011 10:52:22 PM PDT by himno hero ("Armageddon is well seeded, America will pay"... Barrack Obama's vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“Dat’s a nice lookin’ country youse got dere. It would be a shame if sumthin’ ‘happened’ to it.”


20 posted on 06/15/2011 6:21:05 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

LOL!


21 posted on 06/15/2011 6:47:57 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson