Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: AustralianConservative

The problem with Prohibition was that the law was a) rather vague, b) gave the Federal Government the power to [arbitrarily] define “intoxicating liquors” [something most would think would be hard alcohol; yet the definition supplied by the federal government disallowed even beer], and c) was by its nature unenforceable.

C is perhaps the most disturbing in-nature, it is the method by which the government is stripping away our rights: turning Justice from something that is blind and treats everyone equal into something wicked and evil that is wholly dependent on the whims of the police/judge/prosecutor.


7 posted on 06/17/2011 6:29:59 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Yes, Prohibition had its faults, as the post states. And yet in many cases, thousands were saved. People see what they want to see. I try to see the good and bad.


23 posted on 06/17/2011 8:50:30 PM PDT by AustralianConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson