Skip to comments.
Feds look to regulate food similar to tobacco, with hopes of saving money on health care
Daily Caller ^
| 6/23/2011
| Neil Munro
Posted on 06/22/2011 5:47:22 AM PDT by xtinct
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
maggot n chief and his minions (all Democrats) need to be sent a message --> Get out of our lives !!
1
posted on
06/22/2011 5:47:26 AM PDT
by
xtinct
To: xtinct
What part of Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness don't they understand?
2
posted on
06/22/2011 5:50:54 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire but I swear I didn't see him in the rearview mirror.)
To: BipolarBob
To: xtinct
The reason is money, because three-quarters of medical-spending is driven by chronic diseases, such as obesity and tobacco-related diseases, she said. When they figure out that old age is the root cause of medical spending we are all goners
4
posted on
06/22/2011 5:52:29 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Pelosi: Obamacare indulgences for sale.)
To: Mike Darancette
5
posted on
06/22/2011 5:53:33 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
( Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
To: xtinct
What's next? Ear tags, collars with bells and to learn the proper nuanced pronunciation of “moo”?
6
posted on
06/22/2011 5:54:24 AM PDT
by
Voter62vb
To: xtinct
Yep, they plan to do just that.
In the dying breath of the Lame Duck Session the Congress and Senate passed HR2748/S.510/HR2751 (FDA food takeover bill) in the name of food safety. They sold this to Congress by saying we were under attack by terrorist who wished to poison our food supply. Not doubt they would like to, but this is a horror or a bill hatched in stealth at night. I have posted many times the Congressmen who voted for it.
7
posted on
06/22/2011 5:56:21 AM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: xtinct
Of course, the free market is the solution. Make people responsible for themselves. Make them pay for their own costs and let them make decisions based on how they want to live and what they want to spend.
The free market stares these government flunkies in the face and their conclusion is: "We need more government control".
Because it's not about health, it's not about cost, it's not about food.
It's about control.
8
posted on
06/22/2011 5:57:03 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: xtinct
According to the FDA - “There is no ‘deeply rooted’ historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds,”
9
posted on
06/22/2011 5:57:08 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: xtinct
So are they going to ban all junk food purchases with food stamps before the next election? ;-)
To: almost done by half
Junk food might be banned but they will not ban of premium steaks, lobster, shrimp, cookies, etc.
11
posted on
06/22/2011 5:59:45 AM PDT
by
Josa
To: xtinct
This is another disaster in process. Central “planning” NEVER works.
Remember how high cigarette taxes are, now think of what that type of tax and regulation will do to our food supply. THAT is what we are facing.
12
posted on
06/22/2011 5:59:57 AM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: almost done by half
So are they going to ban all junk food purchases with food stamps before the next election? ;-)
13
posted on
06/22/2011 6:00:01 AM PDT
by
absolootezer0
(2x divorced tattooed pierced harley hatin meghan mccain luvin' REAL beer drinkin' smoker ..what?)
To: xtinct
“We are just five days away from fundamentally transforming America”
14
posted on
06/22/2011 6:00:46 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
To: xtinct
How about this...start with the people already recieving taxpayer paid healthcare.
the ones living off the gubmint are far more likely to be fat and smoke than the rest of us.
And since the largest demographic of the largest people are African-American women, maybe Moose-smell should be havin a chat with her sistahs instead of cramping working-man whiteys style.
15
posted on
06/22/2011 6:01:03 AM PDT
by
digger48
To: Voter62vb
16
posted on
06/22/2011 6:01:26 AM PDT
by
screaminsunshine
(Socialism...Easier said than done.)
To: xtinct
Hooray! MORE oppression by big government!
Prepare for the coming taxes on all the “unhealthy” foods ‘shellie tells us not to eat.
It's for our own GOOD people!
17
posted on
06/22/2011 6:04:25 AM PDT
by
subterfuge
(BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
To: xtinct
So to SAVE MONEY, the government demands that we do as they say and ignore the Constitution. How nice.
18
posted on
06/22/2011 6:04:38 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(really?)
To: xtinct
The left’s ultimate goal has ALWAYS been depopulation and the easiest way to control the masses is to control the distribution of food .
Eventually, we will see regs declaring national standards for caloric intake in order to ‘fight’ obesity.
(of course, many government elitists will be EXEMPT from the standards along with the usual cast of government approved minorities)
I’d imagine that those who will be targeted first with strict caloric intake,regardless of weight, will be those of us that reside in Red States and are members of what Congresswoman Jackson calls the Christian Militants.
To: xtinct; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ...
RE :”
The federal government has a growing interest in the eating habits of Americans for the same reason it has an interest in tobacco consumption, said Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. The reason is money, because three-quarters of medical-spending is driven by chronic diseases, such as obesity and tobacco-related diseases, she said. “
Is this even a logical argument? If you wanted to save money wouldnt you just cut tht money spent ? ie Obama-care and medicare and allow different levels of insurance coverage per risk?
If you are successful forcing people to be healthy and they live longer then dont they just get similar medical problems at a later age which will cost more in the long run through entitlements.
Watch closely when these people in DC talk about saving money. Most people just believe arguments like this without question.
20
posted on
06/22/2011 6:07:14 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson