Skip to comments.Operation Fast and Furious — How the Obama Administration Conned the Washington Post
Posted on 06/24/2011 9:08:38 AM PDT by jazusamo
Selling arms to Mexican drug cartels? Misleading the Washington Post? It's all in a day's work for Obama's heavily politicized ATF.
Thanks to Operation Fast and Furious, the incompetence and ineptitude that has infected the Holder Justice Department is becoming more obvious all the time. For department prosecutors (and senior ATF personnel) to approve the sale of firearms to Mexican drug cartels through straw buyers was a deadly misstep.
It led directly to the tragic death of Border Agent Brian Terry. Mexican officials estimate that 150 of their people have been shot by Fast and Furious guns, Fox News reports. The obdurate refusal of Justice to provide the names of the senior Justice leadership who approved this operation at the recent House hearing held by Rep. Darrel Issa shows the willingness of Justice to cover up its mistakes and defy congressional oversight. As Issa accurately said, this growing scandal was so felony stupid that it got people killed.
But Operation Fast and Furious also shows how willing this administration is to deliberately mislead the press and how easily the Washington Post was conned by the administration in a story it published last year.
On December 13, 2010, the Post ran a story about U.S. gun dealers with the most traces for firearms recovered by police. The Post included the names of the dealers, all from border states, with the most traces from guns recovered in Mexico over the past two years. The Post did not reveal where it got this information, but pointed out that Congress passed a law in 2003 exempting the trace information maintained by the ATF from public disclosure. So the Post had to have gotten this information through a leak directly from the ATF (or by illegally hacking the ATFs records, a far-fetched and highly unlikely scenario).
Two of the gun dealers the Posts story assailed were Lone Wolf Trading Co. in Glendale and J&G Sales in Prescott, Ariz. Lone Wolf Trading is number one on the list for Mexican traces; J&G is number three.
However, at the time the ATF was apparently leaking this information to the Post, both of these dealers were cooperating with the ATF in the Fast and Furious Operation. When Fox News talked recently to the owner of J&G, Brad DeSaye, about the ATFs disastrous operation, he said that when he questioned the ATF about whether the agency wanted the gun shop to sell to the cartel front men, the ATF said, Keep selling.
The Post actually interviewed DeSaye over his stores appearance in the trace records. DeSaye, to his credit, did not reveal the still-secret ATF operation to the Post reporters, even though they were clearly writing a negative story that was potentially embarrassing to DeSaye.
This double-dealing by the ATF is appalling. It was bad enough that the ATF was running a secret operation that had gone off the rails and was supplying dangerous weapons to violent Mexican drug cartels. But then the agency apparently leaked deceptive information on gun sales that put the gun dealers in a bad light, or at a minimum, misled the Post when it should have tried to provide cover for dealers who were following ATF instructions. Indeed, these dealers were showing up in the Mexican trace information because the ATF was telling them to ignore the law and the usual verification procedures and sell guns to the cartels, sometime dozens in a single day to one person.
In an irony that could almost be considered comeuppance to the ATF, the Post story was published the day before Agent Terry was killed. Terrys death panicked the ATF supervisors who were running Fast and Furious, a panic that was deserved after two of the weapons found at the murder scene were traced to the operation. Yet in a letter to Sen. Charles Grassley on Feb. 4, 2011, DOJs Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich, the same individual who testified before Issas committee, claimed the ATF had not knowingly allowed the sale of assault weapons to a straw purchaser who then transported them into Mexico. As the whistleblower ATF agents testified, this was patently false.
This apparent leak by the administration to mislead the Washington Post was not a one-time incident. On May 26, just two weeks before the Issa hearing, La Opinión, the largest Spanish-language newspaper in the United States (based in Los Angeles), published a story about the smuggling of guns from America into Mexico. The spokesman for the Office of the U.S. Attorney in Phoenix again specifically named Lone Wolf Trading, which had sold guns at the express direction of the ATF, as being responsible along with other gun dealers for a great majority of confiscated weapons in crimes on the other side of the border. This is the same U.S. Attorneys Office that encouraged and supported every single facet of Fast and Furious, according to the Joint Staff Report prepared by Rep. Issa and Sen. Charles Grassley.
There are two final points that should be made about this fiasco. The fact that Holder sent Weich up to testify on June 15 is very revealing to anyone familiar with internal Justice procedure. Weich is the head of the Office of Legislative Affairs, the office tasked with dealing with Congress. It is not a line department directly involved in prosecutions and investigations. The Fast and Furious Operation would have been handled out of the Criminal Division, headed by Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, former special counsel to Bill Clinton. Breuer (or Arizona U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke) would obviously be the witnesses with the most direct knowledge particularly the question of who at Justice in the top leadership offices was briefed or asked for approval of the operation.
The only reason for Justice to send Weich was to send someone with no actual knowledge of who approved this operation so he could truthfully testify under oath as he did despite tough questioning by Issa that he did not know the answer to that question. The fact that the Inspector General is supposedly investigating one of the other excuses Weich gave for not answering questions is also not a legitimate reason to withhold information from Congress when it is exercising its constitutional oversight function.
Finally, the most obvious question that Issa, Grassley, and others have been asking is: Why would the administration implement such an obviously perilous, risky, and foolish operation that sent hundreds of dangerous weapons into Mexico?
For a possible answer, recall that in 2009 the Obama administration was making a huge public issue about the flow of guns from American gun dealers into Mexico. President Obama himself erroneously claimed at a joint press conference with President Filipe Calderon in Mexico City on April 16, 2009, that 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States, many from gun shops that line our shared border. Everyone from William Hoover, assistant director for field operations at the ATF, to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton echoed this same claim.
The problem, however, was that the 90 percent figure was demonstrably false. Only a small portion of the guns seized by Mexican authorities have traceable serial numbers. In 2008, GAO reported that the Mexican government seized 30,000 guns, and only 6,700 were confirmed to have originated in the U.S. That represents only 22 percent, not 90 percent.
The administrations claim was widely criticized as being wrong which may have provided a political motivation for an ill-advised operation that poured U.S. weapons into Mexico. This could provide the administration with a public-relations coup that supported its claims when it unveiled its prosecutions. Perhaps thats why one ATF supervisor was described as jovial, if not, not giddy, but just delighted [sic] when Fast and Furious guns were found at Mexican crime scenes, and why Acting Director of the ATF Kenneth Melson took such a personal interest that he watched live feeds from secret ATF cameras in guns stores while sitting at his desk.
The bottom line is that considerations other than objective, professional law enforcement judgment seem to have driven the decision-making of the Holder Justice Department. The result has been tragedy and violence and the bloodshed will persist as these weapons continue to be used.
Once again, a very bad lie, to advance a very bad idea for the rest of the U.S. populace.
Next year when we have a Republican Congress and a conservative president, I propose she appoint one new Czar with one responsiblity: the elimination of `non-essential’ federal agencies. Let’s start with the BATF.
If you want to be conned (which I am sure the Washington Post does), conning someone isn’t that difficult.
If you want to be conned (which I am sure the Washington Post does), conning someone isn’t that difficult.
Considering the simpletons who work at the WaPo, is this “unexpected”?
Agreed, and secondly have the new AG go through the DOJ and clean out the leftists.
Fast and Furious/Gunrunner have NOTHING to do with “incompetence and ineptitude.” They were DIRECT, DELIBERATE, criminal plans to “legitimize” the need for drastic gun control legislation. Problem for the Regime is John Dodson and other courageous ATF agents spoke up, blowing the whistle on this grotesque assault on the 2nd amendment rights of the American people. Now Hussein and Holder are in semi-panic mode and the WaPo is working, as usual, to provide cover.
Not unexpected at all, they’ll parrot any lies fed to them by liberals and communists.
Well said. I also believe Fast and Furious was set up as an assault on the 2nd amendment.
Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it.
The Reichstag fire worked for Hitler.
I know some may think that killing federal government agencies is nigh on impossible.
But to borrow from Obozo and his dupes: “Yes We Can!”
Our government is off the rails and out of control.
The Washington Post wants to be fooled by Obama.
This was clearly an advertising ploy by ATF to get the word out to the gunrunners where they might obtain weapons. The merchant was probably in on the plan.
My only question is was the Post reporter working with ATF to get the word out?
Believe what you want but the Chicago crowd aren’t that sophisticated. They were simply using ATF to send guns to favored cartels ~ it’s part of the PAY TO PLAY game they’re into ~ they call it “THE CHICAGO WAY”.
That saved the cartels thousands of manhours in trying to find a dealer to go along with them.
The Post undoubtedly knew what this was about.
Articles like this drive me nuts. The author insists on pretending that the Post is an honest news organization that was somehow bamboozled by the Administration. In reality, there’s no need for the leftists to “con” their own disinformation outlets.
With a Republican President impeachment proceedings would be started by now. And justifiably so.
At the end of the day we will see the head of the ATF fall on his sword and/or get thrown under the bus. A new, and worse Obama toady will take his place, and the Dems in congress will chant their usual mantra of “We need to move forward and let this go”.
And these fascists will continue their march to totalitarianism unimpeded.
I don’t know why von Spakovsky presents it like he is in this article because I’m sure with his experience in DC he knows the truth about WaPo.
By choosing as their target an organization full of commies that would APPROVE of any statist anti-rights stuff as long as it wasn't aimed at the imaginary "rights" they so cherish? Is that still considered "conning" someone, if they fully embrace the thing you're trying to sell them while already being in full knowledge of what it is?
Our US Congress has no balls!
Someone(s) in the DOJ/ATF is an accessory to murder and committing acts of war against Mexico.
The President has continued hostilities (war) in Libya without Congressional approval.
Congress has not approved a new budget in over 2 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.