Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

Thanks, Red Steel. I’ve downloaded and will read (eventually, am rather swamped right now).

Did scribd download (or upload) the document #21-1 which would be the “statement of material facts not in dispute?.”


30 posted on 07/01/2011 3:52:17 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA
FogButt Foggy quoting the government's motion.

... disclosure [of the Form SS-5] ... would serve no public interest.

LoL. There is much public interest and it would exonerate or implicate Obama. Many public minds want to know.

33 posted on 07/01/2011 4:29:43 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson