Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept. STILL Refuses to Disclose Mollohan Documents
National Legal & Policy Center ^ | July 18, 2011 | Kristen Byrne

Posted on 07/18/2011 1:52:01 PM PDT by jazusamo

Mollohan photo

A watchdog group continues to call on the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release documents from a four-year investigation of Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.). Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) previously filed Freedom of Information Act requests and administrative appeals seeking information about why the DOJ did not bring charges against Mollohan.

In 2006, the DOJ and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) launched an investigation on Mollohan and his connections to five non-profit organizations he created that were managed by close friends and real estate partners.

Mollohan allegedly directed more than $250 million in earmarks to the non-profits and its beneficiaries, which contributed at least $397,122 to his campaigns between 1997 and 2006.

The probe began after the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) filed a complaint with the U.S. Attorney for D.C. in February of 2006 alleging that Mollohan failed to report millions in assets on his Financial Disclosure Form (FDR) in order to conceal cozy financial relationships with recipients of earmarks he had arranged. The complaint was based on a year-long investigation conducted by NLPC, directed by Chairman Ken Boehm.

Mollohan himself confirmed many elements of NLPC's complaint on June 13, 2006 when he amended six years worth of FDRs (1999-2004), after denying for two months that his FDRs contained errors. He omitted more assets than he reported on his original filings, including his largest single asset, a note worth over $4 million.

"This is a unique corruption story because for the entire four years Mollohan was under investigation, he was on the Appropriations subcommittee that controlled the Justice Department and FBI," Boehm said. "While he was under investigation, he should have stepped down because that's a glaring conflict of interest."

In January 2010, the United States Attorney's Office for D.C. stated it closed the investigation into Mollohan's conduct without bringing charges.

CREW's Chief Counsel Anne Weismann said that Justice is no closer to disclosing the documents, and she predicts more delay. "I don't expect the Department of Justice to handle our appeal. We're waiting for our appeal to run out and then we will file a lawsuit."

The DOJ's Executive Office of the United States Attorneys refused to provide any documents relating to the Mollohan investigation, including documents that would state why the representative was not criminally charged. Earlier this spring, CREW filed an administrative appeal in response to the DOJ's refusal. In May, CREW filed a second administrative appeal against the Criminal Division of the DOJ, claiming that it has no records pertaining to Mollohan's investigation.

The Justice Department did not respond to phone calls or written questions.

"It seems like they [DOJ] really don't want to turn over the investigation documents, and I think the fact that they refuse to turn the documents over is another red flag," Boehm said. "CREW's requests are very appropriate, so if this case turns over to the federal courts then I think there will be disclosure."

Kristen Byrne is NLPC's Capitol Hill Reporter.

TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: alanmollohan; cultureofcorruption; democrats; doj; mollohan; pelosispeople; transparency; westvirginia
Had Mollohan been prosecuted there's little doubt he'd be doing prison time.
1 posted on 07/18/2011 1:52:10 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

2 posted on 07/18/2011 2:48:28 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Mollohan was tried and found wanting in the court of public opinion in WV. West Virginians unelected him during the last election.

That cost WV a lot of money because with his seniority, Mollohan could be counted on to funnel money to WV. Locally the so-called movers and shakers went into a prolonged period of shock and depression until they realized they could use Manchin to continue some of the local largess through access to state coffers.

Manchin is using his state network to keep the favors flowing to ensure his reelection to Byrd’s seat in the Senate.

3 posted on 07/18/2011 2:57:12 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Thanks...I’ve little doubt Manchin will be reelected and probably have the seat for as long as he wants it, is that the general feeling in WV?

4 posted on 07/18/2011 3:06:32 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Manchin’s wife was appointed vice president of the state board of education last week. Recently as one of the members of that board she voted to have a county school system taken over. She took the opportunity to bitch at the county superintendent who was at the state meeting.

The odd thing is the county’s drop out rate of 18% is better than the state rate of 25%. The kids are scoring higher than the state average on the tests. And the county has never had financial issues.

The audit that was the basis for the takeover was flawed. The county board of education and the new incoming superintendent were not given the opportunity to fix any problems like other counties have been in the past.

Conjecture is that the big frog in that county pond called Manchin to put the take over in motion for political reason locally.

I’s like to see Manchin beat. Although he’s a Democrat he’s really more of a RINO. One saving grace is that he will work against the EPA to protect the coal industry. I’m guessing that means Senate Democrats won’t subject him to any heavy lifting to support unpopular causes until he’s reelected.

Back to your original question, Manchin is walking a tight rope unitl that election. I’d say he’s got a good shot at reelection if he doesn’t get fouled by controversy in the state between now and the election.

5 posted on 07/18/2011 3:42:57 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson