Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coup d’etat on January 21, 2009
The Post and Email ^ | July 23, 2011 | Gary Stevens

Posted on 07/23/2011 7:45:13 PM PDT by opentalk

No battle was fought. No guns were fired. No bullets or bombs were involved. In the smooth movement of a pen over a previously-prepared document, the overthrow of the United States of America took place. The coup d’etat, still in its progressive movement of deconstructing America, was achieved without Congressional debate. No voice of argument. Less than 24 hours into office, the putative President of the United States, Barry Soetero (aka Barack Obama), signed Executive Order #13489.

Filed on January 23, 2009 at 8:45 a.m., the occupant of the Oval office sealed his records containing past names, student status, foreign travels, passport information, Selective Service registration and all educational transcripts. The historical footprint of Barry Soetero (his last legal name since adoption) was wiped away in the swoosh signature of a pen on a document prepared by Robert Bauer. No fanfare. No major media paid attention. For the first time in the Republic’s history an unknown, undocumented, candidate took the highest office of the land.

.... Why has there NOT been discovery allowed in every court case filed regarding Barry’s real ID? Why is the FBI NOT investigating the now-proven fraudulent birth certificate? Why is Congress NOT interested in the fraudulent use of Barry’s Social Security number? Why is the only person who peeked into the passport records of Barry shot dead? Why is it okay to have seventy (70) known documented National Socialist members in Congress? Why is the majority of Barry’s administration all linked to Soros or the SEIU or communist organizations? Is there even a hint maybe something is amiss with the incompetence of the impostor?

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; casssunstein; certifigate; communism; eligibility; forgery; lies; msm; naturalborncitizen; nbc; noaccountability; nodocumentation; nohonesty; nohonordncrico; nointegrity; nojustice; norecords; notransparency; notruth; noveritas; nwo; obama; obamabackground; progressive527s; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: 83Vet4Life

The Pirate Roberts knew he was going to swear in a a likely ineligble affiramtive action hire. He has no intergity, he did it anyway. Roberts is vermin in motion.


21 posted on 07/23/2011 9:13:15 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

my number 1 question,
is how did a Hawaiian teenager,
get a Connecticut SSN.

(under the laws at the time, for a teenager,
the only possible way, would have been to apply in person.
and Barry Soetoro never went to CT.)

it is his. it’s on his (dubious) Selective Service Form.
and it is a CT SSN. not Hawaiian.


22 posted on 07/23/2011 9:14:26 PM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 83Vet4Life

Roberts disappointed me the most. I honestly (and naively) thought he wouldn’t swear him in to office. I noticed that he did choke on it though, and they had to have that do-over the next day (that wasn’t televised).


23 posted on 07/23/2011 9:23:59 PM PDT by CPO retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Elendur

His grandmother was placed to provide it...fraudulently.

It is fake.

I *should* have been the loose end that unraveled everything.


24 posted on 07/23/2011 9:27:52 PM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom

“it”

Not “I”


25 posted on 07/23/2011 9:28:19 PM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
Executive Order #13489 http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1712.pdf

Not sure I see a smoking gun here; Ronald Reagan signed one like it, E.O.#12667 on January 18th, 1989; George W. Bush signed one, too (E.O.#13233), though not until November of his first term which revoked Reagan's.

I did not compare them all word-for-word, but I don't see anything glaringly, obviously suspicious in Obama's (as much fun as that would be ;-)

26 posted on 07/23/2011 9:44:54 PM PDT by GizmosAndGadgets (How free are you in America today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Silly and senseless to call it a coup. The term has a meaning, and this isn’t it. People bandying it around just look like nuts.

Obama won the presidency in the regularly scheduled election as the nominee for one of the two major parties. The people chose Obama, giving him over 69 million votes.

The most we can say is bad judgment by voters isn’t illegal. Or even unprecedented for that matter. Worry a little less about 2008 and a little more about 2012.


27 posted on 07/23/2011 9:58:25 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Dude! If you’re implying what I think you’re implying, that’s just . . . wrong. Very, very, verrrry wrong. Okay, now I need brain bleach.


28 posted on 07/23/2011 10:03:17 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (I'll take Fraudulent Marxist Usurpers for $2.4 Trillion, Alex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“His minions are gonna have one helluva time trying to fill his presidential library. I guess they never worried about what the history books would have to say about his life story, either.

You can put everything the American public knows about this guy on a 3 x 5 index card.”

GMTA! Maybe they figure that by the time he and the diabolical cabal operating him are done wrecking the country, it won’t matter?

Some days I think that the nation is a goner and its fundamental transformation into One World Order national serfhood status is a fait accompli, and on others I wonder if this isn’t all some elaborate trap to draw all of the termites into the light where they can be exposed, arrested and imprisoned enmasse. There are games within games within games going on here, IMHO. I’m not a chem-trails, H.A.R.P, crop-circle conspiracy theorist type person and never have been, but it beggars belief that a fraud of this magnitude could not only occur, but continue to occur, unless, as Holmes would say, “The Game is Afoot” in some shape or form. Excuse me while I don my rose colored glasses for a moment and posit the theory, however tenuous, that perhaps the greatest “sting” operation in the history of humankind may be in the offing? Okay, probably not. You may now return to your previously scheduled pessimistic/realistic life programming.


29 posted on 07/23/2011 10:22:28 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (I'll take Fraudulent Marxist Usurpers for $2.4 Trillion, Alex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Loonytunes article by an obvious crackpot.


30 posted on 07/23/2011 10:40:22 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
"His minions are gonna have one helluva time trying to fill his presidential library."

"Library" will be the clever euphemism his minions will create for "Incinerator."
31 posted on 07/23/2011 10:45:36 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: arkady_renko

NO


32 posted on 07/23/2011 10:52:00 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Sigh...

Clear thinkers they are not.


33 posted on 07/23/2011 11:32:36 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; repubmom; Fantasywriter; Fred Nerks; null and void; george76; PhilDragoo; melancholy; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . . . Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The Coup d’etat on January 21, 2009

Oh! Please click on link and read article.

Thanks, Candor7.

34 posted on 07/24/2011 12:50:30 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GizmosAndGadgets

“Not sure I see a smoking gun here; Ronald Reagan signed one like it, E.O.#12667 on January 18th, 1989; George W. Bush signed one, too (E.O.#13233), though not until November of his first term which revoked Reagan’s.”

Bush’s executive order was much more restrictive, sealing records that would have been made public under Reagan’s order. Obama’s order essentially rolled back Bush’s restrictions on release.

All three orders concern presidential records and not, as the Post and E-mail reported, “past names, student status, foreign travels, passport information, Selective Service registration and all educational transcripts”. I can’t see any plausible excuse for the P&E’s false reporting. If they did not bother to learn what the orders actually did they’re at least acting with reckless disregard for the truth.


35 posted on 07/24/2011 2:39:40 AM PDT by BladeBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

“The Pirate Roberts knew he was going to swear in a a likely ineligble affiramtive action hire. He has no intergity, he did it anyway. Roberts is vermin in motion.”

Does your theory include a motive for Roberts’ crime? As Chief Justice of the United States, he has the top job in the Judicial Branch. The President can neither fire nor promote Roberts. The Constitution forbids cutting his salary.

Perhaps it was political qid-pro-quo for Obama’s support in confirming Roberts as Chief Justice. Oops — no — Obama was one of 22 senators who voted *against* confirming Roberts.

Is clinging to this long-debunked conspiracy theory really so important that that’s it worth smearing John G. Roberts?


36 posted on 07/24/2011 2:54:52 AM PDT by BladeBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
I think the issue with his executive order is that only the Attorney General and Council to the President, are able to review records’ requests and determine if they can be made public or not.
Holder is not the most stand up guy.

The article is questioning why the Constitution and NBC requirement was ignored?
From article:

The HUGE fact that a previous document (the Constitution) required that the office of President and Vice President be eligible as to age, country of residence and a “natural born Citizen” was disregarded in the election of 2008.

The distinction of “natural born” in Article II, Section 1 was deliberately articulated by the founders for these two offices.

Why? So that no foreign loyalties could hamper or been compromised.


37 posted on 07/24/2011 6:01:16 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BladeBryan

“motive for Roberts’ crime”

Roberts’ family.

The conspiracy theory has not been debunked because it’s fact. The man’s a fraud just like his BCs. No one actually knows who he his, and he won’t prove it.

Case in point: We now hear of Bachmann’s migraines. The enemedia is concerned. Why aren’t they concerned about the effects of 0bama’s prior (or any) drug use, his abuse of alcohol, and his smoking. He may develop lung or brain cancer. We don’t know his physical condition, but we have had the intimate details of other Presidents and VPs broadcast far and wide—just like their college work.

Oh, and for a guy that likes to talk so much, where are his political writings, articles and published works? Case law/legal briefs in LEXIS?


38 posted on 07/24/2011 6:17:53 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
8 tries at eliminating NBC requirement (2003 -2008)
from link:

There were eight attempts by members of Congress during the years Barack Obama was developing a power base and running for president to remove the Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born citizen,"

39 posted on 07/24/2011 6:20:42 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks opentalk.
Less than 24 hours into office, the putative President of the United States, Barry Soetero (aka Barack Obama), signed Executive Order #13489... sealed his records containing past names, student status, foreign travels, passport information, Selective Service registration and all educational transcripts. The historical footprint of Barry Soetero (his last legal name since adoption) was wiped away in the swoosh signature of a pen on a document prepared by Robert Bauer. No fanfare. No major media paid attention. For the first time in the Republic's history an unknown, undocumented, candidate took the highest office of the land.

40 posted on 07/24/2011 6:21:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson