Skip to comments.Interests in Mississippi Try to Block Eminent Domain Reform
Posted on 07/27/2011 1:36:28 PM PDT by 92nina
...The Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation and the National Federation of Independent Business appeared as friends of the court, arguing that placing the amendment to the state constitution on the ballot is permissible under the US Constitution because they claim that it does not change the definition of public use or grant new rights to property owners, but rather codifies existing definitions in order to protect property-owners from abuse and provide certainty.
Karen Harned, a spokesperson for the NFIB legal center, stated that "It's one thing for government to take private property for long-standing and well-agreed public uses, but it's just plain wrong for the government to take someone's home, business or farm so someone else can develop the land or secure a better location."
While four candidates for the Mississippi Governors office support the initiative, outgoing Governor Haley Barbour opposes it, claiming that it would limit the ability of the state to attract major development projects. The court challenge was initiated by Leland Speed, head of the Mississippi Development Authority, acting as a private citizen.
The Property Rights Alliance supports the ballot initiative, as an attempt to protect property-owners and small businesses, and limit eminent domain powers to their originally intended use. At very least, those opposing the measure should be persuaded to drop their court challenge, and make their arguments before the public.
(Excerpt) Read more at propertyrightsalliance.org ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.