Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON
In that picture, she looks as she usually does.

If you want to characterize that look as "crazy", that's your problem.

6 posted on 08/07/2011 6:14:42 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hole_n_one

No....I work in photography and art... they intentionally put a picture of her where her eyes are not natural—it is very easy to flatter people or make them look hideous....anyone—even a younger Brad Pitt. I could easily do it to the most beautiful people—make them look stupid, ugly, etc—just by the right angle, lighting, or when they blink a certain way.

This reminds me of the time they narrowed the irises of a politician a few years ago......to shape them slightly to a more oblong shape to get a more demonic, satanic look. Forgot who it was.

They may have even photoshopped the whites of the eyes around the pupils. Bachmann is a beautiful woman, it is hard to make her look hideous and this is definately unflattering and done on purpose.

The media is owned by the homosexual mafia and she has to be destroyed for her husband’s position on their digusting behavior—he dares to think it is—funny—disgusting. Got to make Michelle look unattractive to children so they will think her ideas are unattractive. Heaven forbid children believe the truth—that homosexual activity is disgusting, disease-causing, sick and unnatural and has nothing to do with love—just pure selfish lust.

The Alinsky conditioning to demonize anyone who isn’t on their band wagon of group think is really getting old and people are starting to understand digital photography and photoshop Their house of cards WILL fall down.....it is just a matter of when.............. Leni Riefenstahl 101


24 posted on 08/07/2011 7:07:19 PM PDT by savagesusie (Virtue is a habit of the mind, consistent with nature and moderation and reason. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: hole_n_one
She looks the same, except the camera angle makes what would be a normal picture into a far off gaze, IMHO...

And yes, it was intentional.

39 posted on 08/07/2011 9:06:46 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Would you rather live in Obamaville or Palintown?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson