Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady Jag; Ev Reeman; familyof5; NewMediaJournal; pallis; Kartographer; SuperLuminal; unixfox; ...
Constitutional Convention Ping!

From Chris Collier’s book Decision in Philadelphia, “We remember that the delegates were very conscious of how King George had manipulated Parliament, and the royal governors, the colonial legislatures, by dangling lucrative appointments before influential politicians. In order to prevent this, the Virginia Plan expressly forbade congressmen from holding other public offices. Nonetheless, a president could easily get around the provision by offering plums to family or friends of congressmen; it seemed best to limit his (the President) appointing power as sharply as possible.”

Our Framers were determined to minimize the problem yet not discourage talented men from service. It was a delicate balancing act, for if there had been a ban during and up to one year after legislative service, George Washington would not have been appointed General during the late war.

2 posted on 08/14/2011 3:37:10 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Obamadollars, currency of Acorn Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
Mr. LANGDON was agst. payment by the States. There would be some difficulty in fixing the sum; but it would be unjust to oblige the distant States to bear the expence of their members in travelling to and from the Seat of Govt.

Back in the Horse and wagon days. I love addressing the philosophical elements of the constitutional arguments and then being served a reminder of the difficulties that were an every day labor to the people of those days.

3 posted on 08/14/2011 4:07:56 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Democrats: debt, dependence and derision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

I was of a mod to agree with Mr.Mercer taking some pleasure at comparing his view to modern day. But I am mediated by Mr.Gerrys’ response -and note Mr.Mercer seemed to be pretty much ignored(if I am right)And rightly so for his comment seemed the antithesis of the very purpose they had been delegated to achieve?


4 posted on 08/14/2011 5:05:17 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

Thanks.


5 posted on 08/14/2011 5:29:54 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

Somehow this hasn’t stopped Obama from amassing a gaggle of czars, which are harmful for a different reason than the risk of turning individual influential politicians to him. But there would be nothing keeping an Obama II from carrying that to the next step.


8 posted on 08/14/2011 2:57:25 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson