Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
"I agree with AAM about the weirdness. Look at those jaws!"

I think it helps to understand what the PRB's aim was...and that was, as the name implies, a return to a more medieval to proto-Renaissance style, and to get away from the academic, stylized, contrived compositions of the high Renaissance (hence, "Pre-Raphael"). In that light, the PRB's stuff can hardly be said to be any more 'weird' than say Van Der Weydn's stuff from the early 1400's..

...or countless other examples I could cite..

47 posted on 08/16/2011 3:04:27 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Joe 6-pack

That lady doesn’t have a sock-me-in-the-jaw, but the arrangement to show the forehead is typical of what we see in pictures of the time. Whether it’s realistic, or an art style of the day, we have no way to know.

I understand about challenging previous conventions. However, the faces Rosetti painted are very unusual. I’m sure such exist in real life; his choice to paint them shows his personal taste. I think their jaws are weird.


48 posted on 08/16/2011 3:10:38 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The Commie Plot Theory of Everything. Give it a try - you'll be surprised how often it makes sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Joe 6-pack
I swear I didn't look at your post before you brought up the "medieval style" canard.

But anyhow, Q.E.D.

And if you're going to argue that Burne-Jones wasn't "really" a member of the P.R.B., just consider "The Lady of Shalott" instead.


62 posted on 08/17/2011 11:44:44 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson