Skip to comments.
Palin Reveals Her Opportunistic Streak
The Edmund Burke Institute ^
| August 18, 2011
| Dr. Grace Vuoto
Posted on 08/18/2011 8:43:05 AM PDT by nancyvideo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: maine-iac7
61
posted on
08/18/2011 10:08:56 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: lonestar
Has it been determined that Sarah knows the POTUS term of office is 4, not 2, years?
Just askin'.
Spoken like a true Perry supporter.
To: svcw
To: SoConPubbie
fair enough .. now git back in there after 'em !
64
posted on
08/18/2011 10:10:48 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(1775)
To: nancyvideo
Save your money Sarah. The Iowa Caucus isn't happening for another 5 months, and the voters who matter already know where you stand on all the issues. This whole pre and post convention process is going to double or triple the cost of what any candidate has ever had to spend before.
65
posted on
08/18/2011 10:17:20 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: freespirited
So you're promoting a poll with the following posted demographics?
PARTY I.D.
Republican 29%
Democrat 35%
Independent 36%
GENDER/
Female 59%
Male 41%
Do you really believe that there are 14% more Females that will vote over Males?
Do you really believe that there are 6% more Democraps than Republicans in Iowa?
To: freespirited; Lazlo in PA
Legitimate question. Here is one answer, limited to Iowa GOP voters.
Top 10 Least Wanted by Iowa GOP voters
Furthermore, with Obama's Approval at 39% nationally do you really believe a poll that has these type of numbers?
OBAMA APPROVAL
Approval 47%
Disapproval 49%
Neutral/Uncertain 4%
Sounds like, feels like, propaganda to me!
To: SoConPubbie
Spoken like a true Perry supporter.
I've learned from Palin, Paul supporters.
68
posted on
08/18/2011 10:30:55 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: nancyvideo
Again, she appears to be more interested in bolstering her celebrity status rather than being a serious political figure and doing what is best for the nation. Doing what is best for the nation??? What good is it for the nation to have so many candidates involved in a debate than the voters can pay attention to? By the time the 5th one on the stage is talking, those watching will forget what the first two said.
69
posted on
08/18/2011 10:31:47 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: lonestar
Spoken like a true Perry supporter.
I've learned from Palin, Paul supporters.
No you haven't.
You haven't learned a thing, that's the problem.
To: SoConPubbie
No you haven't. You haven't learned a thing, that's the problem.
Oh yes! and you are blind as a denial bat if you don't see it!
Ironically, I was not a big Perry supporter...voted for him over KBH.
All the Perry misinformation attacks have had unintended consequences with me.
I'm for the candidate who can beat Obama. I think that is Perry.
It sure isn't half-term-experienced-governor Sarah Palin. I do like her...think she is good doing what she is doing. She isn't close to having the experience to be POTUS!
71
posted on
08/18/2011 10:59:14 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: lonestar
I'm for the candidate who can beat Obama. I think that is Perry.
Like I've stated before to you, you haven't learned a thing if you think that the information posted about Perry are "misinformation attacks" or maybe you are just incapable of seeing that Perry is a moderate, that according to the current polling data, any GOP candidate is beating Obama by 9%, that we need a conservative to win, not a moderate like Perry's own record shows him to be.
Keep sticking your head in the sand and believing the canard that only Perry can win, go for you.
If we end up with Perry, we get GWB II, and all the inherent Globalist, Pro-Amnesty, problems that came with GWB.
To: SoConPubbie
If we end up with Perry, we get GWB II, and all the inherent Globalist, Pro-Amnesty, problems that came with GWB.That is exactly the misinformation I'm talking about.
You don't have a clue what Perry is or isn't. You just drink the koolaid and believe what you want to believe.
73
posted on
08/18/2011 11:17:17 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
Comment #74 Removed by Moderator
To: lonestar
Actually those running for president SHOULDN'T have a job - other than running for president. There is no way you can do another job effectively when running for president of the United States. So if that candidate is a senator, governor, etc., they should resign from that office as soon as they announce.
That said, they should be able to draw a nominal salary from their campaign funds to meet household expenses and such. That way, we are not restricting access to the independently wealthy.
To: Lazlo in PA
I am reminded of the propagandist pigs in “Animal Farm” explaining the latest fiasco as the workings of Comrade Napoleon’s deep subtle strategy.
To: nancyvideo
Ho hum. Yet another commentator that simply doesn’t get Sarah Palin nor us for that matter. It’s unfortunate that so many of our “best and brightest” are stuck in a paradigm of old thinking.
77
posted on
08/18/2011 11:34:54 AM PDT
by
upsdriver
(to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
To: lonestar
Has it been determined that Sarah knows the POTUS term of office is 4, not 2, years? Has it been determined that you are too stupid to understand her reasons for resigning her office after 3(not 2)years? Because I'm telling you, she announced the reasons on the day she resigned and reiterated them many times since, not to mention it has been gone over and over here on FR and if you don't know by now WHY then you are probably too damn stupid to vote and should just stay away from the polls this coming election.
78
posted on
08/18/2011 11:41:19 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: SamAdams76
I agree...and only politicians, on the government teat, can keep their job and run for another office.
Of course some resign and don't declare if they are or are not running. I'm glad Sarah has made a lot of money. But now she seems to be playing games.
I don't think it's admirable to show up where declared candidates are scheduled to debate while pretending to be making a decision "to be or not to be" a candidate for POTUS.
She is a celebrity...crowds she attracts may or may not translate into votes. I would stand in line to see her because I like her...but I wouldn't vote for her.
79
posted on
08/18/2011 11:44:07 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
To: lonestar
You don't have a clue what Perry is or isn't. You just drink the koolaid and believe what you want to believe.
Sorry LoneStar, I've done a ton of research on Perry.
He is exactly what I've posted him to be, an Open-Borders, Pro-Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Hate-Crime-signing/supporting, Illegal Alien loving, Big-Government/Compassionate conservative just like GWB.
The only issue he is solid on is Global Warming, he has not been on both sides of that issue and his talk actually matches his walk on that issue.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson