Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British used bioweapon in US war of independence
New Scientist Blog ^ | 19 August 2011 | Debora MacKenzie

Posted on 08/19/2011 12:05:56 PM PDT by Pharmboy

(Image: Everett Collection/Rex Features)

A document has just gone on display at Mount Vernon, Virginia - the museum in the former home of George Washington, first US President. It is an order dated 1777 and signed by Washington himself to send troops that had not been vaccinated for smallpox - or survived it - to Philadelphia to be vaccinated. These troops were then to join up with the main army, where the disease was raging.

It sounds like amazing foresight for its day. "Washington's careful handling of the smallpox epidemic at the beginning of the war was a significant reason for the disease not decimating his army", says Mount Vernon.

Not quite. Washington's order was likely a response, not just to a normal smallpox epidemic, but to a bioweapon wielded by the British enemy - a strategy that the redcoats had already used against the colonists to great effect earlier in the American revolutionary war.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Health/Medicine; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: 1763; 1775; 1777; amherst; biologicalweapons; biowarfare; british; brits; cornwallis; epidemic; frenchandindianwar; godsgravesglyphs; invariolate; invariolating; jefferyamherst; lordcornwallis; mountvernon; patriots; philadelphia; revolutionarywar; revwar; scabs; sirjefferyamherst; smallpox; smallpoxepidemic; uk; variolation; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Moonman62; GraceG
From here.

Variolation wasn’t compulsory, but it was highly recommended. The Continual Congress wanted each and every soldier variolated. They were to be vaccinated because of two reasons. The first was that soldiers could easily contract smallpox from each other and from the civilian population. The other reason was that a few people in the Continual Congress were well aware that the British had used smallpox as a weapon previously during the French and Indian War, in 1763. At the PBS web site we discovered a letter from the British Commander-in Chief, Sir Jeffery Amherst: "Could it not be contrived to send smallpox among these disaffected tribes of Indians? We must use every stratagem in our power to reduce them."

In her book, Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82, Elizabeth Anne Fenn points out that 130,000 North Americans lost their lives to smallpox. Washington, aware of what the British had done in 1763, decreed that letters from Boston were to be dipped in vinegar to kill the germs. When it became evident that the British were attempting to spread smallpox by invariolating civilians and sending them out among his troops (remember, an invariolated individual was contagious for at least two weeks), he asked the Continental Congress for funds to invariolate his troops.

Appealing to the international public, the Pennsylvania Gazette published, "Lord Cornwallis' attempts to spread the smallpox among the inhabitants in the vicinity of York . . . must render him contemptible in the eyes of every civilized nation."

Some put the death rate to small pox at 25%, while some virulent strains were approaching a 40% rate. Fenn puts the overall rate of death at this time at 30%. Just recently we’ve learned that there was a childhood form of smallpox, like chicken pox, that wasn’t as deadly, but it did produce an immunity to smallpox later in life. However, this childhood smallpox was endemic of Europe and not of the early colonies.

21 posted on 08/24/2011 7:25:03 AM PDT by Pharmboy (What always made the state a hell has been that man tried to make it heaven-Hoelderlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

Their cooking, now that’s a crime against humanity.

22 posted on 08/24/2011 7:30:51 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

My Beef Wellington is a thing of great beauty

23 posted on 11/25/2011 7:24:38 AM PST by Mitch86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson