Skip to comments.Divide and Conquer - Is The Democratic Party Causing Discension Within the Republican Party?
Posted on 08/22/2011 10:46:21 AM PDT by SatinDoll
The following is an excerpt from Ulsterman's most recent interview with The Washington Insider, who boldly states that the Democrats have launched a program to interfere in Republican nominating politics.
"The race card, the racial thing whatever its gonna be called, it is the number one asset this administration believes it has to win in 2012. Their own polling data has shown that to be true over and over again. But how far are they willing to push that?...if Barack Obama doesnt win re-election, watch them stand back while the riots break out, and watch them mouth the words Burn baby burn....I know it. If they cant have America, nobody will...This administration is going to attempt whatever necessary to remain in power. Race. Intimidation. Media attacks. Division divide and f**king conquer. You notice how divisive the Republican primary campaigns have already started to become? You think thats all occurring on its own? Hell no. Tens of millions of dollars are already being spent getting conservatives, Republicans, Independents, whatever get them to attack each other. Get them frustrated and lower their desire to vote for the eventual nominee. You know, Republicans used to be the party that would unite behind the nominee when they were chosen it frustrated the hell out of us Democrats who were always bitching over this or that right up until the election. Thats not the case anymore,.."
Well, forewarned is fore-armed, as history admonishes.
So, to me at least, I take this information - tens of millions of dollars! - with at least a bit of suspicion.
I think we've all noticed that the lame stream media is definitely in the game. They repeatedly trash Palin, who isn't even in the race quite yet! (The more they do it, the more I'm sure she is determined to run).
They have praised Romney highly, mostly because he is a liberal Democrat pretending to be a Republican, and beatable.
Huntsman, Gingrich, Bolton, Cain, Bachmann, Perry - some have been ignored while others have been smeared.
Who do you think the White House fears the most? And most scandalously, which among the candidates is openly or secretly being push-pulled by Democratic Party money?
The link to quoted article:
Parts One and Two can be accessed at newsflavor.com
Probably not, because there is no such word as “discension.”
LOL! Feel free to correct any misspellings. I’m not proud.
The fact that something has acquired a name does not make it new.
What we have recently begun to call Stockholm Syndrome has been all over forever.
Every drunken father who spent his life beating his family and was loved by that family for the times when he had a little mercy demonstrated what we now call Stockholm Syndrome. The people Stalin DIDN?T send to the Gulag the night before were sincerely in love with him.
Respectable conservative behavior toward leftists has been straight Stockholm Syndrome for well over fifty years while I have observed it. Leftists have no mercy, and conservatives are lucky if they get off with just being called racists. On the other hand, Buckley was so flattered that Professor Galbraith would associate with him it, made one sick to read him glory in it.
Nowadays I get the impression that if Christopher Hitchens visited National Review the male staff would rape him. He said some honest things about the Clintons during the controversy and conservatives keep praising this rather mindless Marxist to the skies.
Stockholm Syndrome has been around the corner with every little toady who ever came to love his buddy because the bully didn?t hit HIM.
People who find Stockholm Syndrome novel are exactly like someone who read Newton for the first time and said, ?Gee, I never noticed this gravity stuff before!?
But people do not analyze what they have no name for. We always knew political correctness was required by leftists. But it was not really discussed generally until the standard Marxist term slopped over into everyday discussion.
The fact is that one can prevent people from thinking about something by not giving it a name.
One?s brain, like any computer, is limited in the number of steps it naturally makes. So if every time one hears someone say political correctness and that person does not know it is a standard Marxist term, one must go through that extra mental step, and the process stops there.
The establishment sets a limit for how much any conservative who wants to make his living on his respectability can go. Twenty years ago one could debate Martin Luther King?s politics. The day came when anyone who wanted to make a living as a ?conservative? had to grovel when the Great Name was spoken.
When a paradigm like this changes, you are ruined if you don?t know it and you are ruined if you mention it. This is the environment I made my living in.
The day that something becomes verboten for a respectable to say is a lot like the Israeli Lobby on Capitol Hill. Everybody knows that you never mention it, only respectfully and as little as possible. When you do mention it you talk about it as if it were just one of many lobbies.
But if you ever really BELIVED the Israeli Lobby is one of many lobbies you could never get a job anywhere near a congressional office. Anybody who doesn?t make the facts about that group part of his everyday thinking would have to be a genuine retard.
In the case of knowing exactly when a respectable disavows the stance his side made a quarter of a century ago, there is nobody who is a practicing professional on either side who talks about it, and there is nobody on either side who is smart enough to get a job who doesn?t recognize it.
Well we haven't chosen our candidate yet, so this is bunk. Since when have there not been in party fighting in the GOP Primaries? This is stupid. Reagan vs. Bush in the '80 election was nasty. Voodoo economics anyone? How about Bush vs. McLame in '00. After a candidate is chosen, we will back them like we always do. Ulsterman is not a very credible thing to hang your hat on.
Probably, and I wish the GOP would do the same to the dems.
Is the Pope Catholic?
Of course the Dems will do anything they can to gain a political advantage!
Come on, Lazlo; you can do better than this!
Ulsterman is the interviewer quoting a Democrat White House insider. I never shoot messengers. It sounds like you didn’t read the whole interview.
I used to do signals intelligence for the U.S.Navy. Bits and pieces by themselves often make no sense. It is when you begin putting the bits together that the whole picture emerges. So, I read a great deal of information and fit things together. A ‘red herring’ or attempt at obfuscation becomes apparent when I start laying things out.
Others, too, have knocked Ulsterman. That’s OK. It is the information provided by The Washington Insider (which is probably more than one person) with which I’m interested. If it is disinformation, that will become apparent soon. In the meantime I just keep collecting those bits and pieces.
Divide and Conquer - Is The Democratic Party Causing Dissension Within the Republican Party?
Article, then # 1 , # 5 , # 9 .
"Who do you think the White House fears the most? And most scandalously, which among the candidates is openly or secretly being push-pulled by Democratic Party money."
The two *examples* you cite are very...revealing. Stockholm Syndrome indeed.
The race card, the racial thing whatever its gonna be called, it is the number one asset this administration believes it has to win in 2012.
The Rats have thoroughly played this card to it's end. No one is buying. I do see the ghost did use the term "believe" so maybe they know it is a long shot. Right now I see no difference in this election cycle than there were in previous ones except the presumptive GOP frontrunner, Myth, is losing traction to Conservative challengers. There is no more level of infighting than any other.
I will get back on the Ulsterman Bandwagon if I see Holder out the door. That is a big thing to do and would be impressive. As for a challenger on the left, that is a no brainer. Obummer will have one for sure. Have you been listening to Algore lately? He sounds interested in a run to me and has deep pockets.
One other issue I have is the fact that the piece pushes us to back whoever come out of the Primary a winner. I don't see his point here. The GOP base, by all metrics, is foaming at the mouth to see Obummer go. Anyone with an R after his name will have solid support to defeat the Regime. I don't see where that is not going to happen.
Isn’t this what ‘insider’ said would happen?
People like to discredit his reports but several things stated came to pass.
We just have to remember that the DEMS are the enemy. Conquer the DEMORATS first, then we take care of the RINO’s that are left.
Oh, like Conservatives crawling out from under the Republican bus after every election? That Stockholm Syndrome?
If Malik Shabazz and his NBP crowd could stand outside a plooing place with billy clubs and threaten and intimidate "crackers" and be caught on video and NOT prosecuted by the Holder DOJ, what makes people think the attitude will not be one of "anything goes" next time?
The sense that blacks are protected from Federal Prosecution for tampering with the voting process is there. Even ACORN still got its money from the Feds, it only had to change the shingle outside and the letterhead to something different.
I recall the riots of the '60s, the race riots. It could happen again.
That isn't saying there might not be a far more solid citizen response this time, that the violence might not have a far greater lethality, and that the perpetrators and their useful followers would not suffer for their participation, but the possibility exists that such violence just might interfere with the election.
Yep, that's the ace of race cards, the threat of widespread domestic violence, and I think the Obama administration would play it to stay in power and then punish those who defended home and community. (recall the 'private army').
The urban 'flash mobs' have been a probe, practice runs testing the reaction of those who get attacked. So far, the victim groups are not showing enough unity nor a solid tactical response to the attacks, and the level of violence has been relatively low.
When the riots come, the level of violence will likely be amped up, and the response will have to be sufficient to stop it.
That episode did far more to damage Holder and the Regime with the injustice than if a full prosecution was done and convictions came down.
I hear plenty on fear of race riots and the race card being played, but I don't see it effective in the least. The flash mobs are turning out to be just another tool in the arsenal of thug criminals to conduct business with some cover. And even in those cases, leadership in the black community are throwing the blame, not on the white devil, but the black parents. The race card is now a running gag to most Americans. See how often it is played in a week and what the actual outcome is. Usually the accuser is the one ridiculed and belittled.
Another would be the disruption and heckling by lefties of Mitt Romney at Romney's Iowa event less than two weeks ago. (No, I'm not a Romney fan, but the treatment he was subjected to has to be called out for what it was.)
You can expect that the 'Rats will increase their sleazy activity as the process continues, and will focus it on the GOP candidate or candidates they think will have the best chance of winning the general election.
I’m quite experienced at ignoring the hype from either side and doing my own research.
There are plenty of things that neither side wants anyone paying attention to.
Could be, but what’s this “discension”? ;’) Thanks justiceseeker93.
Would vote for a serial killer over Obama at this point.
Agreed. Disruptive behavior at these events doesn't bring anyone to their side.
Huntsman is a stalking horse for Obama. I wonder if he is auditioning to be his V.P.