Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Informed of 'E-Verify' Notice of Mismatch
September 25, 2011 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 09/29/2011 7:20:29 PM PDT by ethical

September 24th, 2011

To: Barack H. Obama 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500

RE: Social Security Administration Notice of Mismatch Letter

Dear. Mr. Obama, Currently, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986) require employers, by law, to establish that their employees are eligible to work in the United States. The Form I-9 was developed for verifying that persons are eligible to work in the United States.

Employers are required by law to have employees hired after November 6, 1986 fill out Section 1 of the Form I-9 when they start to work. Section 1 of Form I-9 asks for your name, birth date, address and social security number (SSN). It also asks you to attest if you are; A citizen of the United States, A non- citizen national of the United States, A lawful permanent resident (Alien#) or An alien authorized to work.

As one of your employers I used due diligence attempting to find a copy of your I-9 on the White House Website and other public records websites and could not. I am including an I-9 Form for you to fill out so I can keep it on file as required by law.

On the White House website I did find your name, date of birth and your address. I found the SSN you are using on a copy of your Selective Service Registration. I have heard you say many times that you are a citizen of the United States.

I registered with the government run E-Verify System and on August 17th, 2011, I entered your name, birthdate, address, SSN and citizen status in to E-Verify. The data was correctly entered. I was allowed to run a check on your eligibility to work in the United States.

I received back a “Notice of Mismatch with Social Security Administration Records: SSA record does not verify, other reason.”

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) have stated that an employer’s failure to adequately follow-up on a Notice of Mismatch could constitute evidence of or contribute to an employer’s constructive knowledge of an employee’s unauthorized status.

When an employer receives a Notice of Mismatch concerning one of their employees the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices states that the employer:

1. Must inform the employee of the no-match notice. Consider yourself informed by means of this letter.

2. Must ask the employee to confirm his/her name and SSN. Please confirm or correct the name and SSN I entered in to the E-Verify System: Barack H Obama 042-68-4425.

3. Please correct or confirm the Citizenship Status I entered with your name, birth date and SSN: A citizen of the United States.

Sincerely,

Linda Jordan Seattle WA


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: barrysoetoro; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; everify; fake; forger; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
E-Verify Round 2
1 posted on 09/29/2011 7:20:39 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ethical


2 posted on 09/29/2011 7:26:11 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

he could try one of the other SS numbers he bought.


3 posted on 09/29/2011 7:26:22 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

JOE vs. JOSE

You have two families: “Joe Legal” and “Jose Illegal”. Both families have two parents, two children, and live in California ..

Joe Legal works in construction, has a Social Security Number and makes $25.00 per hour with taxes deducted.

Jose Illegal also works in construction, has NO Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash “under the table”.

Ready? Now pay attention....

Joe Legal: $25.00 per hour x 40 hours = $1000.00 per week, or $52,000.00 per year. Now take 30% away for state and federal tax; Joe Legal now has $31,231.00.

Jose Illegal: $15.00 per hour x 40 hours = $600.00 per week, or $31,200.0 0 per year. Jose Illegal pays no taxes. Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays medical and dental insurance with limited coverage for his family at $600.00 per month, or $7,200.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $24,031.00.

Jose Illegal has full medical and dental coverage through the state and local clinics and emergency hospitals at a cost of $0.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for food stamps or welfare. Joe Legal pays $500.00 per month for food, or $6,000.00 per year. Joe Legal now has $18,031.00.

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for food stamps, WIC and welfare. Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,200.00 per month, or $14,400.00 per year. Joe Legal now has 9,631 .00.

Jose Illegal receives a $500.00 per month Federal Rent Subsidy. Jose Illegal pays out that $500.00 per month, or $6,000.00 per year. Jose Illegal still has $ 31,200.00.

Joe Legal pays $200.00 per month, or $2,400.00 for car insurance. Some of that is uninsured motorist insurance. Joe Legal now has $7,231.00.

Jose Illegal says, “We don’t need no stinkin’ insurance!” and still has $31,200.00.

Joe Legal has to make his $7,231.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, etc..

Jose Illegal has to make his $31,200.00 stretch to pay utilities, gasoline, and what he sends out of the country every month..

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal’s and Jose Illegal’s children both attend the same elementary school. Joe Legal pays for his children’s lunches, while Jose Illegal’s children get a government sponsored lunch. Jose Illegal’s children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal’s children go home.

Now, when they reach college age, Joe Legal’s kids may not get into a State School and may not qualify for scholarships, grants or other tuition help, even though Joe has been paying for State Schools through his taxes, while Jose Illegal’s kids “go to the head of the class” because they are a minority.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same police and fire services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it, now?

If you vote for or support any politician that supports illegal aliens... You are part of the problem!

We need to keep this going—we need to make changes ASAP!

It’s way PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!

What are you waiting for? Pass it on.


4 posted on 09/29/2011 7:30:43 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (.a.d.y.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ethical

That should provide a good laugh at the White House.


5 posted on 09/29/2011 7:31:39 PM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Nice little exercise... in futility. Don’t ya think that once a person becomes president, that all such records as SS#’s are wiped clean and are no longer in the system. So, naturally it would come back mismatched... I merely speculate. However, if you are able to successfully do this with other presidents, still living, and get the same mismatch message, you’ll know for sure. But, if you get a confirmation of a match on one of the out of office presidnets, you may actually be onto something.


6 posted on 09/29/2011 7:32:18 PM PDT by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
I registered with the government run E-Verify System and on August 17th, 2011, I entered your name, birthdate, address, SSN.....

Should you be admitting to this in public using your full name? It is against the law to run someone's information without their authorization (authorization given through signed I-9 form.) and must be completed 3 days prior to hiring. It is illegal to run it on current employees or someone not directly in your employ.

http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/E-Verify_Manual.pdf

7 posted on 09/29/2011 7:39:48 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
and there it is...
8 posted on 09/29/2011 7:40:15 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Has the (other) SS visited yet?


9 posted on 09/29/2011 7:42:36 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Bottom line.... Jose Illegal has a lot more extra beer money and habitually drives drunk.


10 posted on 09/29/2011 7:43:39 PM PDT by Bullish (Recovery won't begin until Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

I wouldn’t be surprised if mismatches come up for most public figures as their information is readily available and I bet a lot of people try to use that data to apply for credit cards, visas, etc. I remember that Richard Nixon’s SSN is very popular among criminals and people who don’t want to give their own.

It would be interesting to run some through eVerify but it is illegal to use the system that way.

Side note funny story but germane to the topic- http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/misused.html


11 posted on 09/29/2011 7:44:10 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

“JOE vs. JOSE”
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Rick Perry is rooting for Jose. He has some big home builder friends in Texas that hire sub contractors who pay Jose to do dry wall and framing and etc....

Those friends make big $$$$ donations to the Texas GOP. Jose has nothing to worry about in Texas.


12 posted on 09/29/2011 7:46:14 PM PDT by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

Not true.

From the Social Security Index via Ancestry.com

Ronald W. Reagan
SSN: 480-07-7456
Last Residence: 90024 Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
Born: 6 Feb 1911
Died: 5 Jun 2004
State (Year) SSN issued: Iowa (Before 1951)


13 posted on 09/29/2011 7:57:25 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

He was using the ssn number last year on his tax return. maybe the guys who “wipe stuff clean’ did not know he was president yet?


14 posted on 09/29/2011 8:07:27 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

I just emailed that to my hubby, thanks!


15 posted on 09/29/2011 8:08:12 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

already ran the check on August 17. I was informing Obama of the results in this letter.


16 posted on 09/29/2011 8:08:38 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ethical


17 posted on 09/29/2011 8:10:00 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

A gray area, I was willing to argue that I was one of his employers.


18 posted on 09/29/2011 8:10:04 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Even if that argument could be made, the law requires that the verification check be run no later than three days prior to employment and it is against the law to run it on either existing employees or using it as a screening tool for potential employees who haven’t completed an I9 for your company (which is the release to verify legal employment status)


19 posted on 09/29/2011 8:14:44 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Yeah the law also states every employer has to have an I-9 filed for their employees, why is the President and Congress exempt? Disparate treatment.


20 posted on 09/29/2011 8:24:06 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

In the 70s, SS numbers weren’t necessarily assigned by applicant’s residential address. They could be issued based on the office through which the application was made.

I got mine during that time period, and never lived in the state coded into the number, but the location code does line up with where I turned in the application.


21 posted on 09/29/2011 8:27:05 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Obama should sue LoL!


22 posted on 09/29/2011 8:27:27 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Still, what’s Obama doing with a CONnecticut SSN? The little sport was in Hawaii going to school at the time this SSN was issued. And what SSN was Obama using while he dished out shaved ice to Baskin-Robbin customers before he got this SSN?


23 posted on 09/29/2011 8:35:17 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

To: ethical
Even if that argument could be made, the law requires that the verification check be run no later than three days prior to employment and it is against the law to run it on either existing employees or using it as a screening tool for potential employees who haven’t completed an I9 for your company (which is the release to verify legal employment status)
//////////////////
An I-9 form is NOT a release, it IS a verification form where the employee submits proof of their right to work in the U.S., such as a birth certificate, passport, etc.

A Release Form is completely different. I have had to file I-9 forms many times and have also had to sign Release Forms. They are different forms.


24 posted on 09/29/2011 8:39:08 PM PDT by Crazy ole coot (obama was born a brit and is not a Natural Born Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Don’t have a clue about his aquiring the Con SSAN, just know that residence wasn’t required at that time.

From everything I have seen, it appears his entire clan is a bunch of grifters, and scamming the SS via multiple SSANs and IENs would be the norm for that bunch.


25 posted on 09/29/2011 9:03:47 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ethical
President Obama could easily release his original Social Security application form and put this Social Security number issue to rest.

1. As many of us know, we can easily get a copy of our original Social Security application form by simply writing to Social Security and asking for a copy and paying a small fee.

2. So if you and I can easily get a copy of our own Social Security application, then surely the President of the United States can get a copy of his original application form tomorrow and release it to the public for the world to see.

3. But we all know that President Obama won't ever do such a thing during this presidential campaign season, because (1) either no such application form exists, or (2) if one does exist, it will show us once and for all that the original form was mailed from Hawaii, where teenager Obama lived when he supposedly applied for his Social Security card,or it was mailed from Connecticut by some unknown person.

26 posted on 09/29/2011 9:43:28 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

I wonder how much money this organization has gotten from the Obama administration?

http://www.houseofumoja.org/EatHealthierAmerica/links.htm


27 posted on 09/29/2011 9:55:20 PM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

A ‘Notice of Mismatch’ from the SSA is a trigger for an investigation not speculation. So let the investigation begin. If everything checks out. Fine.


28 posted on 09/29/2011 10:25:22 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Dang! that nails it.


29 posted on 09/30/2011 1:12:44 AM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

That was an email.

Thought it pretty much summed it up.


30 posted on 09/30/2011 6:45:14 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (.a.d.y.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
As this Social Security No. conspiracy is distinctly different from the Birth Certificate conspiracy, I think the proponents deserve their own name.

Right now I am leaning towards either ‘Socializers’ or ‘Socialists’.

What do you think?

31 posted on 09/30/2011 10:37:55 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical; All

If any of you were listening to Rush today towards the end of the first hour, he was commenting on this article dealing with Obama.

I can only say for someone who claims not to want to touch the eligibility issue, Rush has given this article/commentary national exposure.

Read on FReepers...

‘Warning: The threat of suspended elections is real’

With absolutely no proof of any kind of who he really is, Barack Obama made it to the Oval Office in 2008. There was no media vetting of the largely absentee senator from Illinois, who even back then had the temerity to compare himself to Abraham Lincoln. All anyone ever had to go on was an autobiographical book suspected of being ghost-written by an unrepentant domestic terrorist. We all know how it goes with politicians and autobiographical books.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40802


32 posted on 09/30/2011 10:50:56 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
Thank you, and I have sent it out in mass along with the tag line from another FReeper.

A taxpayr voting for Obama is like chickens voting for Col Sanders

33 posted on 09/30/2011 11:04:16 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Very well done. although the costs for rent and other itmes are too low for some areas, like California and New York.


34 posted on 09/30/2011 4:36:04 PM PDT by JoeA (JoeA / Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
A taxpayr voting for Obama is like chickens voting for Col Sanders

Priceless!

35 posted on 09/30/2011 6:08:19 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (.a.d.y.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
The back of my truck.


36 posted on 09/30/2011 6:26:48 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Brave soul.


37 posted on 09/30/2011 6:35:09 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (.a.d.y.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Tell me bout it. That is in Cambridge MA! Moonbat heaven! All I see is Obama bumper stickers! But the fun is cutting in front of their Prius’s so they can read my banner....lol.


38 posted on 09/30/2011 6:38:18 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

When someone dies, does the SSN die with them, or do they put that SSN back in circulation; i.e., is every new issue of an SSN a “brand new number”?


39 posted on 09/30/2011 10:10:01 PM PDT by CanaGuy (P.M. Steven Harper: We gave you a majority, now get busy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy

All new. Never reused. Never.


40 posted on 09/30/2011 11:14:03 PM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

Presidents’ SSNs are not changed when they are elected.


41 posted on 10/01/2011 3:39:26 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

So, you’re pointing out the improper use of public tools to expose the improper use of the public by a Tool? Wait, what?


42 posted on 10/01/2011 6:59:05 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (He's "Too Black to Fail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

“Obama” needs a premium version of LifeLock. It’s called LIE-Lock.


43 posted on 10/01/2011 7:03:22 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (He's "Too Black to Fail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ethical

“A gray area, I was willing to argue that I was one of his employers.”

What you evidently forgot is that kings do not view themselves as employees. That would imply they are actually beholden to the people, which is the last thing any self-respecting king would want to admit. I commend your initiative, but my cynical side says nothing will come of this.


44 posted on 10/01/2011 11:26:08 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson