Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tables Turned on White House Press Corps
October 3, 2011 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 10/03/2011 11:21:55 AM PDT by ethical

Tables Turned on White House Press Corps October 3, 2011 Press Release

I have two questions, not for the President, but for the White House Press Corps.

1. Why is Barack Obama using a Social Security Number , issued out of Connecticut in 1977, when he was 15 years old and living in Hawaii? Keep in mind that if you are over 12 years old you have to apply for your SSN in person.

2. The President held a press conference on April 27th, 2011. He announced that he had requested a waiver from the Hawaii Department of Health (DOH), in order to obtain a photo copy of his original, long-form, Certificate of Live Birth instead of the computer generated Certification of Live Birth per Hawaii DOH policy.

He gave the press a letter from his lawyer Judith Corley requesting the waiver and a letter from Hawaii DOH Director Loretta Fuddy granting the waiver. This waiver allowed the President to get a photo copy of his original birth certificate.

But he did not post a photo copy on the White House website he posted a computer generated document. You don’t need a waiver from the Hawaii DOH to get a computer generated birth record and scanning a photo copy in to a computer does not turn it in to a computer generated document. So where is the photo copy of the President’s Certificate of Live Birth and why did he lie about posting it?

Press Challenge: Forget about whether or not the President will answer these questions. Can YOU answer them?

Press Contact: Linda Jordan


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birth; democrats; fraud; jokerreporters; liberalmedia; mediabias; noaccountability; nohonesty; nointegrity; notruth; noveritas; obama; obamedia; reportersasjokes; reportersonknees; ssn
Going out today to the White House Press Corps.
1 posted on 10/03/2011 11:22:05 AM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; bitt; melancholy

ping


2 posted on 10/03/2011 11:29:02 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Farrago fatigans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Never get any answer except standard snowballing.


3 posted on 10/03/2011 11:34:26 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

These should be two of the questions at the next GOP presidential debate...


4 posted on 10/03/2011 11:34:41 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: ethical

GREAT!!!

I can’t see how this simple but important question has been ignored by MSM for so long

That he uses this conn SSN can not be disputed. His selective service form alledgedly from 1979 shows it
and the image of it has been archived so 0dumbo can’t scrub it

we need to keep asking.
Thank ou for posting


6 posted on 10/03/2011 11:36:37 AM PDT by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Rush was right today. GOP candidates who go on lame stream media MUST understand that they want to destroy you. It’s OK to go...just go prepared to take on their premises and their BS.


7 posted on 10/03/2011 11:37:00 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Pres Obama goes to a primary school to talk to the kids and get a little PR.
After his talk he offers question time. One little boy puts up his hand and Obama asks him his name.

“Walter,” responds the little boy.

“And what is your question, Walter?”

“I have 4 questions:

First, why did the USA Bomb Libya without the support of the Congress?

Second, why do you keep saying you fixed the economy when it’s actually worse?

Third, why did you say that Jeremiah Wright was your mentor, then said that you knew nothing about his preaching’s and beliefs?

Fourth, why can Brazil drill for oil in the gulf and sell it to us, but we aren’t allowed to drill there?”

Just then, the bell rings for recess. Obama informs the kiddies that they will continue after recess.

When they resume Obama says, “OK, where were we?

Oh, that’s right: question time. Who has a question?”

Another little boy puts up his hand. Obama points him out and asks him his name.

“Steve,” he responds.

“And what is your question, Steve?”

Actually, I have 6 questions.

First, why did the USA Bomb Libya without the support of the Congress?

Second, why do you keep saying you fixed the economy when it’s actually worse?

Third, why did you say that Jeremiah Wright was your mentor, then said that you knew nothing about his preaching’s and beliefs?

Fourth, why can Brazil drill for oil in the gulf and sell it to us, but we aren’t allowed to drill there?”

Fifth, why did the recess bell ring 20 minutes early?

And sixth, what happened to Walter?”


8 posted on 10/03/2011 11:37:36 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Absolutely, no one should argue with the left based on their false premises, but should destroy those premises instead.

Prov 26:4-5


9 posted on 10/03/2011 11:39:41 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ethical

“.... if you are over 12 years old you have to apply for your SSN in person.”

You might want to check that out as a factual matter. The SS rules changed dramatically in the early 80’s.

Until that time, those under 16 didn’t require a SS# unless they were working in a position that withheld SS. I didn’t get my SS# till I was 16, but had to apply for SS#s for my kids born in the 80’s by or before their 4th (IIRC) birthdays.

Until the early 80’s, self-employed were, or could be, exempt from SS.

Lots of SS changes took place after 1977.


10 posted on 10/03/2011 11:42:45 AM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Who is Linda Jordan? Will she be able to at least make the 0dumb0 partisan media squirm a little bit because of their fawning pandering of the commit pig 0dumb0?


11 posted on 10/03/2011 11:55:16 AM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

My youngest is 12 and the SS number was filed for at the hospital following delivery. To claim kids as dependents you are supposed to list their SS numbers on your tax return so I doubt most people would wait until 12 or 16 years old.


12 posted on 10/03/2011 11:57:33 AM PDT by Edison (I don't know what irks me more, the lying or the incompetence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ethical
So where is the photo copy of the President’s Certificate of Live Birth and why did he lie about posting it?

Easy question; obvious answer.

Hussein's constituency has a collective IQ at genius level, but there's 15 million of them. They have no more grasp of "long form," or "computer-generated" than the average feral cat.

Clearly, the long form has information on it that is at best ectremely embarrassing, and at worst a disqualification for the presidency.

Next question?

13 posted on 10/03/2011 12:00:36 PM PDT by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

The SSN Obama is using was issued in 1977. We know that.

He was 15 years old at the time and living in Hawaii. In 1977 you could not get a Conneticutt issued SSN when living in Hawaii.

Obama says he worked at Baskin and Robbins in Hawaii as a teenager sometime between 1977 and 1979. SS taxes were taken out during that time period.

I know that in 1955 you had to apply for your SSN in person.

I have a copy of the current application for a SSN in front of me and if you are over 12 you have to apply in person.

According to E-Verify and people who investigate fake identities and do credit checks, Obama and the SSN he uses long ago crossed the threshold of believeability. The red flags of fake, fraud and credit risk have been raised. Time to answer the question.


14 posted on 10/03/2011 12:06:00 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Edison

That’s TODAY and 12 years ago ... it’s not 1977, well before the radical changes to SS that took place in the early 80s, and since.

Way back when, people (at least in large numbers) didn’t file false deductions for kids, there was a certain level of trust that no longer exists. Look up the SS regs in the 60’s and 70’s. Totally different from today.


15 posted on 10/03/2011 12:18:40 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ethical; EDINVA
Re: EDINVA’s “possible” explanation for Obama’s identity theft

Ethical,

How many **possible** explanations does an ordinary person have in their life? Hm? None? Is your life straight forward? ( probably). Of all the people close to you and with whom you interact on a daily basis, are their lives filled with “possible” explanations? ( no)

Yet....Those defending Obama have **HUNDREDS**, maybe even thousands of “possible” explanations to give “possible” reasons for nearly everything in Obama’s unbelievable life story and posted forgeries? Yet....Alarm bells are not going off in their heads.

Well....The Obama defenders should heed Yuri Bezmenov’s warning. The **first** people dragged from their homes in the middle of the night, line up against the wall, and shot were the Useful Idiots.

16 posted on 10/03/2011 12:19:26 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ethical

The fact that the yet to be vetted Obozo made it to the White House is just more proof of the American voter’s irrelevance.


17 posted on 10/03/2011 12:24:56 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; Edison

I remember my father needed my brother and I to apply for our SS numbers in the late ‘70s or ‘80. He needed them to claim us as dependents.


18 posted on 10/03/2011 12:27:26 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ethical

I applied for my Social Security # @ 1960 and sent it in the mail. Never even knew where the nearest Social Security office was.

Are you thinking of the OTHER SS, Selective Service, for in person application? There are far more Armed Forces recruiting offices than there are Social Security.

I’m not arguing that BHO isn’t using a suspicious SS#, but reminding that there were very dramatic SS rules changes adopted in the early 80s. Until then parents just listed their kids names on tax returns; then, after the new rules were implemented, parents had to get a Social Security number for each of them by, IIRC, age 4.


19 posted on 10/03/2011 12:28:39 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Way back when, people (at least in large numbers) didn’t file false deductions for kids, there was a certain level of trust that no longer exists. Look up the SS regs in the 60’s and 70’s. Totally different from today.

Way back then our local newspaper had an SSN Contest where you would clip a coupon out of the paper, put your SSN on it and mail it to them. They would draw a number each week and print it in the paper, and if it was yours you were a winner. Hard to fathom today....but true.
20 posted on 10/03/2011 12:33:02 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

It’s sad, isn’t it ? No one trusts anyone any more.

I love to tell the story of my best friend and I, ages 11 and 9, respectively, being allowed by our parents to ride the NYC subway alone from Queens to Manhattan for a day at the “Y.” hahaahha can you even IMAGINE that today???

Not only were we safe, but when she got on the train and I was left crying on the platform, adults came along to comfort me, and told me she’d be waiting for me at the next stop .. which she was! And we did it all without cells.


21 posted on 10/03/2011 12:39:18 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Shhh, don’t go around asking such questions or you’ll be on the Attack Watch list!!!


22 posted on 10/03/2011 12:42:10 PM PDT by bgill (There, happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
Keep in mind that if you are over 12 years old you have to apply for your SSN in person.

Are you certain about that? My sons are in their 30's and we got them SS #s via mail when they were in their teens and wanted to find jobs.

23 posted on 10/03/2011 1:16:39 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Way back when, people (at least in large numbers) didn’t file false deductions for kids, there was a certain level of trust that no longer exists.


Actually that’s not true. On 4/15/1987 seven million children disappeared in the US overnight.

That’s the date the IRS started requiring SS# for all minor dependents on their tax returns.


24 posted on 10/03/2011 1:43:44 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

oh, I know there was that cheating going on, probably since the inception of SS. But what raw # of children were reported the year before? What percent does 7M represent of the total number of children claimed?

When I referred to ‘back when” I wasn’t referring to the 70s and 80s when it became rampant and necessary to require kids’ SS#s.


25 posted on 10/03/2011 1:57:54 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Well, according to here

http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/pop1.asp?popup=true

there were 63.1 million children in the US in 1987, so over 10% disappeared.


26 posted on 10/03/2011 2:11:14 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

hey, I ADDED 3 in ‘87, does that help?


27 posted on 10/03/2011 2:30:38 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I didn’t have to apply in person either. My parents applied for me before my 16th birthday.


28 posted on 10/03/2011 3:49:02 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; ethical

wintertime:

I must say, your ill-considered comments referring to my post, and to me, as an Obama defender/apologist/excuse-maker and “useful idiot,” warrant an apology.

If you have any comprehension skills, instead of just reading what you want a post to say, you would have recognized that I was advising ethical that SS rules/regs changed dramatically in the early 80’s, and that in 1977 a 12 year old did not have to go in person to obtain a SS#. I tend to prefer accuracy when addressing matters relating to Obama and the WH press corps. Pity if that offends you.

I shall await your apology.


29 posted on 10/03/2011 4:08:02 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Wow on #16. None of that made any sense at all.


30 posted on 10/03/2011 4:15:51 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
How do you know someone 12 or older did not have to apply in person in 1977? I know in 1955 you had to apply in person. I know in 2011 you have to apply in person if over 12. In 1977 a 15 year old kid in Hawaii does not get a SSN issued out of Connecticut. And why does that same SSN fail the E-Verify check, flagged with a Special Indicator Code for fraud. At this point you don't continue to speculate you get answers. If I failed E-Verify I would have to answer questions and offer proof of why I shouldn't of failed it. If I had a SSN issued in 1977 out of a state I had never lived in, I would have to answer some questions.
31 posted on 10/03/2011 4:22:15 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ethical
How do you know someone 12 or older did not have to apply in person in 1977?

I got my SS card in 1968-69. Neither I or my parents had to apply in person. I just called my dad to confirm it.

My sons got their cards, as I posted earlier, when they were around 15-16 years old in the mid 80's. Neither mom, dad or the the boys had to apply in person.

32 posted on 10/03/2011 4:30:55 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ethical

I had to apply for mine in Michigan in person in about 1956. I needed it because I was going to work for Wrigley’s Super Market, bagging groceries for .65c an hour plus tips. I was 14.


33 posted on 10/03/2011 4:36:21 PM PDT by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

There is a silver lining to the progressives reaching the point of shooting the useful idiots, most of the Media are useful idiots. Large numbers of PHDs are useful idiots. The Democrat herd would be considerably thinned.


34 posted on 10/03/2011 4:43:50 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
I shall await your apology.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Oh wow! You're OOOOOOFended!

No way, is an apology forthcoming. Obama entire past life is one big collection of thousands of “explanations”! We see them every day on Free Republic. Yours is just one more floating around in the toilet bowl of Obama’s life. Normal people don't have to explain their lives. Their lives are straight forward.

35 posted on 10/03/2011 5:05:58 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Ethical, the only question I posed was about having to apear in person at a Social Security office to obtain a SS# in 1977. I think you may have wrong information about having to apply in person for a SOCIAL SECURITY card in 1955. I applied for mine in 1960 by mail. It may be be, as I noted above, that you might be confusing the 1955 requirements for a SOCIAL SECURITY card with a SELECTIVE SERVICE card. I can’t vouch for 1955, only 1960. However, I DO think there’s confusion there between the two “SS” cards.

My intent was to offer a suggestion from a friendly source rather than to be challenged by the WH press corps. Apparently it’s been taken as some sort of Obama defense, which couldn’t be farther from the truth, but I am quite thru with this thread. Good luck with your quest.


36 posted on 10/03/2011 5:44:55 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Certainly did not mean to take things the wrong way. Simply to clarify. Whether or not you have to apply in person if over 12, as it is today, is the minor point. The bigger point is how do you get a Connecticut SSN when you live in Hawaii and are 15? And why does that number fail the E-Verify check and get flagged for fraud?
37 posted on 10/03/2011 6:08:04 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Actually, I’m neither offended nor surprised. I just was testing to see if you had the guts to recognize what an ill-informed response you posted to my suggestion to ethical, and to apologize for it. I doubted it and you proved my assumption.

Your tagline is a hoot. What have YOU done for Constitutional restoration? Post on a website? My life partner and I have filed four SCOTUS petitions and/or amicus briefs, two of which were accepted in winning cases, all for conservative causes. How’s that for straightforward?


38 posted on 10/03/2011 7:52:27 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Excellent.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2787207/posts?page=5#5


39 posted on 10/05/2011 7:59:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ethical
I know that in 1955 you had to apply for your SSN in person

So odd that people have different recollections, which makes me wonder if things were different in different states. I got my social security card when I was 14/15 (1974/5)while living in Georgia and I remember filling out the paperwork and mailing it. In fact, it might have been the first 'real' piece of mail. It was a big deal to me because that mean I was so very very grown up.

40 posted on 10/06/2011 7:02:33 AM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson