Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Court Sets Hearing About Obama's Birth Certificate: Fox News Will Be In Attendance
BirtherReport.com ^ | 10/07/2011 | Orly Taitz

Posted on 10/07/2011 6:24:48 PM PDT by GregNH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
To: rolling_stone

That is absolutely correct. Unless you have evidence, it is nothing. When an investigator came to me with facts, evidence, he had to have something concrete. I’ve seen neigh unto nothing on this issue to convince me it is anything more than a canard. It is tilting at windmills.

No cases start without admissible evidence.

Discovery can not be a fishing expedition. It must be based be show to reasonably appear to lead to admissible evidence. Mere assertion means nothing. And you can not have discovery absent a pending suit (except in the rarest of circumstances)

Evidence comes from facts, not conjecture or supposition.

I don’t understand your last question.


41 posted on 10/07/2011 9:09:35 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I don’t understand your last question.

You just answered it, you are not acting like a reasonable person, rather one with an particular bent...your ignore the known information and hide behind what is not yet revealed...do you want the truth or are you happy to continue to be ignorant and not pursue the truth? According to your comments you are not interested in the truth and accept the hiding of facts as nothing to see. So once again what was your prior name on FR?


42 posted on 10/07/2011 9:16:06 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Were you a Assistant to Roy Bean?


43 posted on 10/07/2011 9:16:54 PM PDT by Deaf Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

*shrug* ok

And, yet again, I don’t understand your last question.


44 posted on 10/07/2011 9:21:30 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

HAHAHAHAHA God knows I’m just about old enough.


45 posted on 10/07/2011 9:23:08 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
You do realize its people like you that make us all look bad.

Who's "us"? Noob.

46 posted on 10/07/2011 9:24:38 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

We conservatives.

You wanna disagree with me, have at it. I respect that. But if you wanna be treated like an adult and be taken seriously as an adult, act the part. Musing on whether or not I “scratch my balls” doesn’t sell that adult thing too well.

Whenever we have cogent discussions on the issue, it just takes one post like yours for us to be labeled as drooling morons.


47 posted on 10/07/2011 9:33:07 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

I’m not a lawyer, but I think the trajectory to a federal Circuit Court is from a federal District Court. You have to begin at the District Court level, claiming violations of federal law. Then, if you lose there, you go to the appeals court, I don’t think one goes from a municipal or state court to a federal appeals court, with the exception of the DC Court of Appeals, and then IIRC it’s straight to SCOTUS.


48 posted on 10/07/2011 9:41:34 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Some have in their minds they are so tuff when we spew nonsense.

Keep blathering. We know what you are.


49 posted on 10/08/2011 1:11:30 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Meh. As an attorney I find this entire issue pretty meaningless and remain utterly unconvinced of the “evidence”.

******

You could be right, but I think that there will be a lot of voters come election day Nov. 2012 who will vote against Obama because of the way Obama has been so secretive about his background during the 2012 presidential campaign.

For instance, it has been nearly six months since Obama released his long form birth certificate to the public on April 27, yet Kapiolani Hospital has not said one word to verify that Obama was born there as it is stated on the long form birth certificate.

It would take a simple phone call from the President of the United States to Kapiolani officials---and put a deadly dagger into the heart of birther nation---for those officials to verify tomorrow that Obama was indeed born there, for those officials to allow reporters to examine Obama's records, and for the officials to point out the room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961, but Kapiolani and Obama are conspicuously silent. Why is that?

Could the answer be a simple one: Kapiolani officials are conspicuously silent because Obama was not born there as Obama claims, so there are no Obama records for anyone to look at, and there is no hospital room where Obama's mother stayed in 1961.

50 posted on 10/08/2011 1:18:20 AM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: john mirse; Fred Nerks
Kapiolani Hospital didn't exist in 1961, it wasn't constructed until the mid '70s; there was only Kapiolani Clinic for Women and Children at that time but that was an out patient facility.

If any paper document of his birth exists it's in the State's archives of Births and Deaths and Orly Taitz might as well go back to pulling teeth than to pull out that archive.
51 posted on 10/08/2011 1:40:34 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congess!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: john mirse
The Stanely Ann Dunham maternity bed Ann Dunham's hospital bed
52 posted on 10/08/2011 2:11:45 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ken21

“have you looked at the photoshopped resume? on wnd.”

Actually, the best deconstruction of the forgery I’ve seen is right on Eww Toob at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

Albert Einstein Renshaw carves that thing into many pathetic layers in the space of less than 7 1/2 minutes, using the source document from the WH website. It’s utterly devastating.


53 posted on 10/08/2011 2:35:08 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (He's "Too Black to Fail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
I remember...

At the time Kapiolani Clinic for Women and Children was just that, a clinic. Its services were daily, its hours were normal business hours but they probably had a night time staff to receive, advise or shuttle patients off to Queen’s Hospital just a few blocks away. But it wasn’t a hospital in the 60s. Kapiolani Hospital wasn’t built until the early to mid 70s. It’s possible to deliver a child at a clinic just as it’s possible to deliver a child in the back of a taxi but both the clinician and the taxi driver would make an effort to get the mother to be to a maternity ward at a hospital.

THE OBAMA FILE

54 posted on 10/08/2011 2:44:12 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Boojum

And within hours and just a few days we knew what club Tiger was hit with by his wife and how many other holes his putter was involved in.....


55 posted on 10/08/2011 5:42:18 AM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
As a curious American, I find your post to be nonsensical.

The obama administration has blatantly and repeatedly lied to your face about a Constitutional issue and that's meaningless and the evidence unconvincing?

Either you haven't taken the time to see the evidence or you're an obama supporter or you're suffering some other mental defect that interferes with your judgment.

Just curious, how much are they paying you for these posts?

56 posted on 10/08/2011 7:05:21 AM PDT by GBA (The Constitution and conservatism must win in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Look, Obama IS a liar of the first magnitude. And I have looked at the evidence on this and remain utterly unconvinced.

That’s why courts are not run by robots but by human beings ... people reach varying conclusions. I don’t agree with, but respect your opinion. Pity you can’t respect mine.


57 posted on 10/08/2011 7:51:21 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

Be sure and take your first sentence to heart.

I know what you are.


58 posted on 10/08/2011 7:56:08 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

Excellent points. To steal your quote, “you could be right”. lol And you are indeed correct that the response to it all by the Obama Admin has been anything but “normal”.

While I just don’t think the facts are there at all on this, I do think your points are very good and certainly raise a suspicion and will have some influence on the “fence sitters”.

Again ... good points. =)


59 posted on 10/08/2011 7:59:13 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

That is an excellent movie ~! A movie of my YOUT ~hehe


60 posted on 10/08/2011 8:24:32 AM PDT by simplesimon (Thomas Paine is weeping. Common sense is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson