Posted on 11/01/2011 7:53:42 PM PDT by bullypulpit
Yeah....that’s not a national election...where Perry isn’t even a top three candidate right now. Perry did THAT to himself.
KH was talking with a friend who specializes in FEC reporting just a bit ago. She’s going through Cain’s filings and expecting to see more dirt than she already knows about. Also, she is saying that Romney is behind the Politico story. Cain wasn’t supposed to do this well and harm Mittens.
But already the uninformed Perry haters are saying this hit piece came from Perry when it obviously came from an individual Cain hater/Perry supporter.
Perry would never say anything like this.
Not sayin’ I didn’t enjoy it but Perry wouldn’t say it.
Jeffress is not Perrys pastor.
They live 500 mi apart.
Jeffress mearly condoned Perry.
An all the Mitt lovers here at FR declared that Perry sucked for Jeffress words.
Rick Perry never uttered the words.
HEY PAL. An INVESTIGATION is not an admission of guilt. Block is hiring and independent investigation in this matter to prove that.
Cain did not even announce his Presidency until May. The alleged donations were made in December and January.
Cain is a SOLID CONSERVATIVE who currently is standing between us and a ROmney nomination so I would appreciate it if the Perry supporters would LAY OFF. They come on EVERY THREAD and bash Cain. I am FED UP.
Cain for me.
Obama is Chicago Mob
Nor did Obama speak Rev. wright’s words....I’m sure you were busy standing up for Obama on the same crappy argument.
Jeffress introduced Perry.That makes him his pastor.
Neither seem to know the creator of the universe.
That works two ways.
I've seen the Cain-and-only-Cain crowd swarm just about every thread about Perry with the same tired insults and lame jokes.
It was leaked by Romney.
But Cain has not helped himself. He knew about this for 10 days prior to it coming out. Then he fumbled over and over.
But Perry had nothing to do with this...
It was All Romney. (And Yes - the Palin attacks and yes - the Perry attacks too)
See the earlier post regarding the connection between Politico and Romney.
But...
Cain should have known this was coming and now he has lied and tried to cover it up. He doesn’t know which one it is (women) when they ask questions of him.
I like Cain
You have to be insane. Perry supporters do not go on Cain threads and bash Cain. It’s just the opposite. to say what you said is ridiculous.
Go on any Perry thread. There were several posted today. I posted two myself.
The Cain supporters were on them like white on rice spewing their venom.
Perry supporters on this thread, complaining that Cain supporters are here, are funny.
The thread bashed Cain in the title. The thread leads with an anti-Cain post.
Then when Cain supporters, having been alerted by the title of the thread itself come to his defense - Perry bots whine about it.
What a fiasco.
Perry supporters are starting to remind me of the ultimatum: “it’s me or the dog”.
Be careful with demands like that.
You might not like the decision.
That wasn’t Perry’s pastor. You do realize that First Baptist DALLAS is a long way from the Methodist Church in Austin in more ways than one.
Concerned Women of America has a right to question Cain about the issue of the charges of Sexual Assault. It is a big deal for most women. Being asked to clarify and explain yourself is not a hit piece. It’s called vetting. THe fact is there are things that are just now being found out about Cain’s past and we the people deserve to know all about it.
Oh guess what was just posted in the Washington Times? Cain voted for Clinton.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2011/nov/1/report-cain-voted-clinton/
You do not honestly believe this is a Perry thread?
Do you??
Read the title.
THERE IS NO "SEX SCANDAL". Calling it a sex scandal certainly degrades from any rational argument that may be in this piece -- it's shoddy, yellow journalism to use loaded words where they don't apply.
Even if you believed there was real sexual harrasment, nobody would call that a "sex scandal".
I'm not easy on Cain, but this is way beyond what is supported by fact. I would also have to disagree with the blanket statements about him being an "ass".
There may be an argument to be made that Cain is used to being able to just order people around. That's certainly how the private business world works; the CEO tells people what to do, they do it. But any argument is undercut by the misleading language used.
I don’t even know who “KH” is supposed to be and she is “expecting” to find dirt. What does that mean? Guilty until proven innocent?
I’m going to vote for Mr. Cain, I don’t give a f*ck what anyone else says, I’m done with the GOP, and if that means Obama gets re-elected and America dies, then so f*cking be it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.