Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The question of ethics is now raised higher on Justice Kagan.
1 posted on 11/11/2011 10:43:23 AM PST by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: OPS4

Ethics - Kagan. What am I missing?


2 posted on 11/11/2011 10:45:06 AM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4
I have questions about an answer to a question asked of Holder by one of the Senate's Judiciary Committee last week.

I am paraphrasing the question and answer:

Was Justice Kagan involved in discussions about Obamacare?

Holder: No she was asked to leave or removed from the room when this subject came up.

My question is why was she excluded or removed from the room? Did they know she was going to become a SC Justice way back then?

I think Holder lied to cover for Kagan so she would not be subject to recusing herself.

5 posted on 11/11/2011 11:06:23 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4
The question of ethics is now raised higher on Justice Kagan.

Axed and answered.

Objection.

Overruled.

Noted.

The bitch has none and doesn't care.

6 posted on 11/11/2011 11:09:31 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the Terrorists Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

Given Laurence Silberman’s vote and opinion just rendered from the First Circuit, I think none of this matters. He is a conservative Reagan appointee, a co equal in stature with Scalia in his knowledge and in his constructionist views. Many consider him a mentor to Chief Justice Roberts. So my view is that Silberman’s opinion on Obamacare and the mandate, that they are within the powers of Congress under the Commerce Clause, will have great influence on Roberts and Scalia’a decision.


8 posted on 11/11/2011 11:37:25 AM PST by xkaydet65 (IACTA ALEA EST!!!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

More evidence that Obama”care” will get the majority support from the rigged NINE SUPREMES.


9 posted on 11/11/2011 11:54:17 AM PST by Graewoulf ( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson