Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY

If she were still Solicitor General, she would be the one making the oral arguments for the government in front of SCOTUS. Her successor is the one that will likely be doing so.

She was a huge cheerleader for this bill, sat in on meetings where details of the bill were being hashed out.

If that is not grounds for recusal, then no judge should have to recuse themselves from any case.


7 posted on 11/15/2011 12:31:59 PM PST by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Greyhound

“If that is not grounds for recusal, then no judge should have to recuse themselves from any case.”

She’s a DEMOCRAT, so normal rules do not apply. The gays running today’s major media will see to that.


10 posted on 11/15/2011 12:42:13 PM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson