Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climategate II (Saturbray) ^ | 11/29/11 | bray

Posted on 11/26/2011 8:12:40 AM PST by bray

Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? James 2:5

Round two of the Climategate look inside agenda driven science fraud. Just when you thought they may have learned their lessons from the first round we have the same crooks doubling down for their own enrichment and their war on capitalism. Scientists have become drunk from their own power and position inside the cult of liberalism where they are the High Priests and have made them absolutely corrupt from that power.

These emails are even more reveling than the first release of emails as they talk amongst each other about how manipulated their data was as well as questioning their own superstars such as professor Mann from Penn State. They discuss how bad his models and conclusions were and have no real proof to defeat the manmade warming skeptics.

The Mann fraud is especially damaging to their Public Relations as they call it, since it is the entire argument of algore’s movie Incoherent Lies. He discussed the devastation that was being caused by the increase of manmade CO2 and the prediction of even more increase. His entire movie came to a climax when he got into his “contraption” where he dramatically raised the graph line twenty feet and the end of mankind within thirty years. The Mann hockey stick graph which algore was exaggerating was being discussed among their emails as being embarrassing from a scientific standpoint yet none of them came forward.

This fraud goes to the heartlessness of liberalism. The basis of this godless cult is that science is god and there is no God or absolutes. There are only shades of grey so rather than the Ten Commandments they worship moral relativism. Using relativism allows them to decide what is good and bad as well as what is justified to accomplish an end. What could be more justified than saving the earth? Likewise if you are a committed communist what could more justifiable than eliminating capitalism and the inequities of that inferior system. As scientists this allows them to bend the rules of science making the data fit their theory and this is what these emails expose.

This set of emails expose the manipulation of the data using the scientific trick of putting the weather stations in urban areas. Obviously, the temps are going to be higher due to the amount of concrete and buildings with the more absurd stations being next to AC exhausts as well as end of runways while aircraft were blowing on them. The GW scientists who questioned those results were silenced by the GW scientists and authorities.

<0044> Rean: [...] we found the [urban warming] effect is pretty big in the areas we analyzed. This is a little different from the result you obtained in 1990. [...] We have published a few of papers on this topic in Chinese. Unfortunately, when we sent our comments to the IPCC AR4, they were mostly rejected.

<4789> Wigley: there are some nitpicky jerks who have criticized the Jones et al. data sets – we don’t want one of those [EPRI/California Energy Commission meeting].

Jones: The jerk you mention was called Good(e)rich who found urban warming at all Californian sites.

The next batch is related to the same issue of bogus science from manipulated temps so the scientists could make the data match the agenda they were promoting. With the addition of their losing the argument as skeptics continue to expose their fraud, scientists begin questioning their own colleagues’ tactics and especially Michael Mann the star of algore’s crockumentary.

<4241> Wilson: I thought I’d play around with some randomly generated time-series and see if I could ‘reconstruct’ northern hemisphere temperatures. [...] The reconstructions clearly show a ‘hockey-stick’ trend. I guess this is precisely the phenomenon that Macintyre has been going on about.

<3373> Bradley: I’m sure you agree–the Mann/Jones GRL paper was truly pathetic and should never have been published. I don’t want to be associated with that 2000 year “reconstruction

<4369> Cook:I am afraid that Mike is defending something that increasingly can not be defended. He is investing too much personal stuff in this and not letting the science move ahead.

<5055> Cook: One problem is that he [Mann] will be using the RegEM method, which provides no better diagnostics (e.g. betas) than his original method. So we will still not know where his estimates are coming from.

This little gem explains the collusion between the corrupt scientists and our gummit both having the same agenda to enslave the taxpayers. For the DOE and the gummit, this was their ultimate dream of taxing air as well as controlling energy production as we see today. This CO2 fraud has allowed them to write laws closing coal power plants as well as most oil production through fraud science. For the scientist he receives massive federal grants which many professors receive 50% and higher for their own personal accounts.

<1577> Jones:[FOI, temperature data] Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (US Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.

Finally, these emails point to the obvious ignoring of the largest pieces of the thermal equation of the sun’s power as well as water vapor in the air. Most skeptics point to those and other factors such as equatorial oceans absorbing the solar heat and holding it yet is never mentioned in the GW community. The reason being of course is they don’t fit the agenda so they are never given the herculean weight they deserve.

<1982> Santer: there is no individual model that does well in all of the SST (Sea Surface Temps) and water vapor tests we’ve applied.

<0850> Barnett: [IPCC AR5 models] clearly, some tuning or very good luck involved. I doubt the modeling world will be able to get away with this much longer

<4443> Jones: Basic problem is that all models are wrong – not got enough middle and low level clouds.

<4085> Jones: GKSS is just one model and it is a model, so there is no need for it to be correct.

These are a handful of emails released explaining the lies and corruption these scientists are promoting to further their political agenda. This is a look inside the academic institutions which are no longer learning centers but Seminaries for the religion of liberalism and all of tenets this cult requires of its followers. There are no scientific rules or criteria, simply whatever it takes to further their cult. By the looks of these emails the only evidence they have is their so called consensus which is also cooked numbers.

Global Warming is not the disease but a symptom of what happens when politics takes over an institution like liberal doxology has taken over science. Everything liberalism touches becomes corrupted and academia is no different. There is no longer a search for the truth but a tool to further an agenda and an ideology. The truth is secondary to promoting this agenda so all of your results have to prove your beliefs right and your enemies wrong. This form of junk science permeates the scientific world making observers skeptical of all of their findings knowing how easy it is to make the data fit the results. Until we see a complete reforming of science and academia we would be wise to be skeptical of everything they declare or promote as scientific consensus.

Pray for America

TOPICS: Politics; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: emails

1 posted on 11/26/2011 8:12:42 AM PST by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%; abclily; AbeKrieger; AFPhys; airborne; Alan H; Allegra; Always Right; ...

Enough Brayin

2 posted on 11/26/2011 8:20:23 AM PST by bray (The Tea Party Occupies their Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Mann speaks about ‘The Cause’. The Cause is the be all and end all of the AGW movement. Everything is subservient to The Cause. Anything that advances The Cause is right and true and praiseworthy. In the world of climate quackery, the ends always justify the means.
3 posted on 11/26/2011 8:53:21 AM PST by JPG (The loons at OWS will soon be at each others throats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bray

How can I get off this list?

4 posted on 11/26/2011 1:37:14 PM PST by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Join the WE Campaign
with Al Gore

"WE is a growing number of people who believe we can solve this. Not just as individuals with strong beliefs but as part of a group where our strength makes governments and corporations change. WE can put our planet on a new path. Clean energy solutions are out there waiting. Solutions that will not only save our planet but help rebuild our economy. WE can lead."

5 posted on 11/26/2011 4:23:37 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
Svante August Arrhenius (19 February 1859 – 2 October 1927)

"We often hear lamentations that the coal stored up in the earth is wasted by the present generation without any thought of the future, and we are terrified by the awful destruction of life and property which has followed the volcanic eruptions of our days. We may find a kind of consolation in the consideration that here, as in every other case, there is good mixed with the evil. By the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates, especially as regards the colder regions of the earth, ages when the earth will bring forth much more abundant crops than at present, for the benefit of rapidly propagating mankind." (p63)
He was the first person to predict that emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels and other combustion processes would cause global warming. Arrhenius clearly believed that a warmer world would be a positive change. [ Världarnas utveckling (1906), German translation: Das Werden der Welten (1907), English translation: Worlds in the Making (1908)]

6 posted on 11/26/2011 4:38:25 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bray; SolitaryMan; golux; SteamShovel; Bockscar; Thunder90; rdl6989; marvlus; Fractal Trader; ...
Thanx for the ping bray !


Beam me to Planet Gore !

7 posted on 11/27/2011 4:15:30 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson