Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Kagan - Fingers and Toes Are Crossed Today! (sent entitled Email day of Obamacare vote)
director blue ^ | Novembe 29, 2011 | Doug Ross

Posted on 11/30/2011 5:18:12 PM PST by opentalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: GeronL

She looks like ‘Goo’ from Gumby and Pokey.


21 posted on 11/30/2011 6:50:59 PM PST by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

“What was there about the term hint/appearance of conflict of interest that I failed to communicate properly?”

1. Kagan had direct involvement.
2. CT had NO direct involvement.

Failing to see there not being any possible way these two cases as similar might have something to do with it.


22 posted on 11/30/2011 7:57:24 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
Okay let's try another route. Justice Thomas's wife worked zealously in AHF's efforts to stop passage of Obamacare.Justice Kagan cheered the passage of Obamacare and may have participated in planning to defend it against legal challenge. She did not take part in the writing or passage of this monstrosity.

When that Wisconsin judge stopped implementation of the governor's labor reforms many pointed to her husband's or son's, I don't recall which, ties to the Wisconsin labor movement, and were angered that she didn't recuse herself. Those demands were absolutely correct, even though the judge had no direct interest in the case before her..

if there is evidence that Justice Kagan was not honest before the Senate about her involvement in preparing Obamacare's legal defense, then I believe she should be impeached, but absent compelling evidence I see recusal of neither or both as the proper course. Certainly this makes me a commie pinko who should be zotted and banned immediately.

23 posted on 11/30/2011 8:42:03 PM PST by xkaydet65 (IACTA ALEA EST!!!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Gee I wonder how she will vote?


24 posted on 11/30/2011 8:58:54 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

“Certainly this makes me a commie pinko who should be zotted and banned immediately.”

Don’t know if you are a commie or a pinko, but you are certainly out of your mind if you think that way. I appreciate the heads up...I’ll stand off.


25 posted on 11/30/2011 9:07:04 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

Oh....from the article;

• Kagan took early and aggressive action to involve her office in Obamacare...

• Kagan made key staffing decisions starting in January of 2010...

• Kagan was part of the deliberative process in the Obamacare defense strategy...


26 posted on 11/30/2011 9:55:38 PM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: opentalk
More Kagan Emails (Judicial Watch) DOJ with held from senate confirmation hearings.

--An October 13, 2009, exchange between Kagan and former Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal. Katyal informs Kagan, “We just got Snowe on health care,” referring to Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME). (The bulk of the email exchange reflects a discussion about Kagan, and also provides instructions regarding a hiring decision within the agency, although the nature of the position is unclear. When Katyal asks if Kagan wants to handle the hire via email or in person meeting, Kagan responds, “In person. I’ll call a meeting when I return.”

--A March 16, 2010, email from Kagan to David Barron, then-acting head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, asked if he had seen an article by Michael McConnell published in the Wall Street Journal that discussed a strategy by Democrats to “‘deem’ ObamaCare into Law without voting.” “Did you seee [sic] Michael McConnell’s piece in the wsj?” Kagan writes in an email with the subject line “Health care q.” “YES, HE IS GETTING THIS GOING,” replied Barron.


27 posted on 12/01/2011 4:02:52 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson