Skip to comments.All of the candidates except Gingrich, Romney and Paul should drop out before Iowa
Posted on 12/01/2011 5:54:03 PM PST by TBBT
The Newt Surge is official. Over the last week, Gingrichs Intrade odds of winning the nomination rose from 16% to 39%. Romney has faded a little but still leads with 47% odds. No one else is above 5% odds.
The polls are even more stunning. Rasmussen shows Gingrich leading 38%-17% in a national poll. Real Clear Politics lists polls with Gingrich leading Romney by 15-30 points in Florida, South Carolina and Iowa, and trailing Romney by only 10 points in New Hampshire.
In the general election match-up, Rasmussen has Gingrich leading Obama by 2% and Romney trailing Obama by 6%. Romney is typically competitive with Obama. The tier-two GOP candidates usually trail Obama by double digits.
As a result of this data, we believe only Romney and Gingrich have a realistic hope of winning the 2012 GOP nomination. We believe that only Romney, Gingrich and Paul have a sufficient following to justify continuing.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/01/all-of-the-candidates-except-gingrich-romney-and-paul-should-drop-out-before-iowa/#ixzz1fKyB2Rl7
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
However, it would be nice to see those debate stages with fewer candidates standing on it.
That’s funny. This is the list of the first three I would like to see drop out.
It may not matter.
Wrong Paul? Seriously?!
sure.. sets it up for Newt. you have the liberal, the nut, and the Conservative poser.
Giving a choice between the 3 I’d likely go Newt. Or stay home.
Nobody needs to go anywhere till some actual voting is done.
This would totally destroy the whole point of a primary system.
Paul won’t win any primaries and then we’ll be stuck with Newt Romney.
All of the candidates except Cain and Romney should drop out before Iowa
The Kingmakers: All of the candidates except Gingrich, Romney and Paul should drop out before Iowa
The Kingma... who cares what you think!
I don’t see why anyone should drop out before the very first primary.
stay home then, and find something other than FR to do with your time.
I mock Ron Paul.....LMAO that he should stay in the race. He needs to check himself into an insane asylum with his soul mate Dennis Kook-sin-itch.
That's the whole point. The establishment wants it that way. They want the nominee to be chosen just like the Republican gubernatorial nominee is selected in states like Ohio...when it's Joe Blow's "turn" because he's been such a loyal RINO party man for 25 years.
Um, of all the current candidates who should drop out, R-U-N Paul is number one.
That's the second time I've seen you say that to somebody. Who put you in charge?
Shessh dude. Chill out.
I share the opinion with lots of freepers. No Mittens, and unless newt convinces me he’s not a global warming, amnesty, single payer health care system lover.. No Newt.
You know what you call someone who doesn’t vote yet continues to gripe about everything in politics? A stupid jackass.
You are about as stupid as they come.
Then go ahead and call me one. I’m done selling my soul. No Perry, no Newt, no Paul, no Romney. Ever.
I would go write in, also with huntsman or La Raza Rick.
Paul is a Losertarian not a Republican.
Oh, well, since theses never heard of before Tech Guys say it then it must be done.
Everybody wants to freeze the field when their choice is at the top. By your standard, Gingrich shouldn’t even be in the race, because he should have dropped out when Perry surged in August. And of course when Cain surged in October.
Preach it brother, buccaneer. Can I get an Amen? :-)
You would stay home? That is what most FReepers did in 2008. Are we trying to help LIBS wreck America?
He is now on a Greta interview (taped today) and is on a stride. Newt is doing well.
Says who? 90% of us voted for Palin.
Forget it! People just want to bitch about Newt on a couch, giving amnesty that he never proposed, and that he has been married three times. They don’t want to be faced with any real substance. When I hear Gingrich, I feel hope and possibilities for the first time in three years.
38% Rasmussen is pretty damn high.
Who knows? Paul will do better in caucuses than primaries on average. Newt will likely be hit very hard in the next month.
It remains to be see whether Newt is a flavor of the month or not. There’s a lot to hit Newt with, and he’ll get hit. Every candidate knows that has to happen. So it’ll happen.
Someone could win Iowa with 21%. If Santorum keeps working hard, he could get 10% or more. Bachmanns a neighbor, she could get 10%. Cain hangs in there, he gets 10%. Give 5 to Perry and 5 to Huntsman. Gingrich, Romney, Paul all at 20%.
It’s a fairly realistic potential scenario.
I can’t believe that the Iowa Evangelicals want multiple adultery and divorce Gingrich. So they might go to Santorum or Bachmann.
With the way the attacks on Bachmann have ramped up I’m guessing she worries them.
No.. I’ll vote down ticket. I assume Michelle will run for her seat again unless she pulls off some magic and wins the first few primaries.
However, if it is mittens or Zero.. I don’t see a lick of difference between them.
It is really sad to read all the so called Republicans/Conservatives on FreeRepublic that are so anti-freedom and mock the only candidate that espouses liberty of the individual.
I was mocked and told to vote McCain back in 2008 knowing full well that man was a RINO.
Ron Paul 2012
No matter what, we need to defeat 0.
No matter what, we need to defeat 0.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.