Posted on 12/06/2011 9:24:46 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
There are many reasons to think Ron Paul is a bottom feeder. He refuses to support a Constitutional amendment to protect normal, heterosexual marriage. He voted to turn the United States military into a San Francisco bath house by repealing DADT. He wants to see drugs and prostitution legalized. He thinks Islamo-Nazi Iran should have a nuclear weapon. He surrounds himself with lunatics like Cindy Sheehan's love slave, Screwy Lewy Rockwell. In general, there isn't a sewer RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) isn't too proud to hunt for food in.
Then, there's this. From CBS News:
***********************************
"Libertarian Congressman Ron Paul is breaking with many of his fellow Republicans - among them his son Rand - to support the creation of the planned Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center that has come to be known as the 'ground zero mosque.'
In a statement decrying 'demagogy' around the issue, the former Republican presidential candidate wrote late last week that "the debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque.'
'Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be 'sensitive' requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from 'ground zero,' Paul continues.
He goes on to argue that 'the neo-conservatives' who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia...never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20014453-503544.html
************************************
Yes, I know this is old news. No, I'm not breaking any new ground here. However, since Ol' Ru is running for President, this crap should be revisited. (Even Howard "YEAAAAAAAAH!" Dean thought this was a bad idea.)
I don't want to get involved in the technical legalities about whether or not this House of Hatred should or should not be built, since the developers don't seem to have the money for Lincoln Logs, let alone building a gazillion dollar insult. That was beaten to death last year and I don't feel like rehashing it. What I want to focus on is RuPaul's detestable attitude on the matter. (Which is eerirly similiar to Chariman Obama's and Nazi Pelosi's detestable attitude on the matter.)
The above snippet shows, once again, that RuPaul is NOT a Conservative, regardless of what his drug addict followers claim. He's basically an anarchist, and this little episode proves it.
Now, before we get started, I think it's appropriate to explain what I mean by anarchist. I'm not talking in this sense of a bomb-thowing V For Vendetta type. I'm talking about someone who believes they have the right to do what they please when they feel like doing it. That's what RuPaul is advocating here. This has nothing to do with "neo-conservative" war mongering or the religious rights of Muslims. (This is a bare-bones explanation of RuPaul's mentor Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism, which basically states that society should allow individuals to do as they please as long as they can afford to do so.)
A Conservative doesn't believe in any of the above nonsense. A Conservative is a staunch defender of the individual and his rights, but the Conservative also believes in common sense and morality. For example, a Conservative would defend a bar owner's right to allow smoking in his bar, but a Conservative would fight tooth and nail to stop a strip club from opening next to an elementary school or a church. The Conservative fights for limited government, but never for anarchy. The Conservative also believes that while the individual has rights and those rights should be defended at all costs, the individual should use those rights in a responsible manner. In other words, the Conserative may very well want to give the social finger to the driver of a Smart Car with a "Obama 2012" bumper sticker, but he doesn't because he believes in a polite moral society.
Ladies and gentlemen, yes there's a fine line that often gets blurred when it comes to our rights, and I don't claim to have all the answers. But I will tell you this, I sure do understand our rights better than Ron Paul does.
Looks like ol' jd777 is no longer with us.
If he could/would really cut a trillion bucks from the federal budget his first year in office, I would vote for him in a heartbeat. All of the other candidates seem to be dancing around the issue, which means more of the same - compromise (i.e., more federal spending, not less).
Neither is this retread.
Oh, I’ll have to go look, I think he was the one hinting that I am a closet homo.
There are many reasons to think Ron Paul is a bottom feeder. He refuses to support a Constitutional amendment to protect normal, heterosexual marriage. He voted to turn the United States military into a San Francisco bath house by repealing DADT. He wants to see drugs and prostitution legalized. He thinks Islamo-Nazi Iran should have a nuclear weapon. He surrounds himself with lunatics like Cindy Sheehan's love slave, Screwy Lewy Rockwell. In general, there isn't a sewer RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) isn't too proud to hunt for food in. Then, there's this. From CBS News: "Libertarian Congressman Ron Paul is breaking with many of his fellow Republicans -- among them his son Rand -- to support the creation of the planned Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center that has come to be known as the 'ground zero mosque.'
If what’s left of my brain is still working, RuPaul voted for military action in Afghanistan.
+1 !!
I wonder if he got an offical “zot you” on another thread. He is gone, you’re right.
Dropping like flies, they are.
Afghanistan was funny. He issued a statement opposing it citing a bunch of conspiracy theories like the WOT was just about putting a pipleline in there.
Then he voted for it....
..then he made statements over and over against it..
HI mnehring,
I found all the info about everything but this...
I bet you didn’t know he was literally kicked out and locked out of the Libertarian Party after an embezzlement scandal in 1988, which is why he came back to the Republican party after denouncing them? Literally locked out. After the FBI raided their offices, the door locks were changed and they found themselves out on the political street.
I need some sources please for this info.
Thanks in advance!
Here is one mention:
http://www.nationalledger.com/news-tech/ron-paul-on-the-verge-of-going-628092.shtml
For others, you’ll need to dig through Google archives as this was pre-internet.
THANKS!
Boy, you’re a real dumbsh##!!
JC
“...I got an answer, you think the military and the spirit of the corps is moral? The military are hired to do one thing does one thing well, kill the enemy when called on to do so. If you’re qualified to do that, who cares what your sexual preference is! I would agree that DADT should have stood instead of being repealed.”
You sound like a mafia hitman, amoral and stupid!
JC
A while back, was googling images for Johnny Cash and Folsom prison one time and "Folsom Street Fair" (or some equivalent) came up in the suggestions list. Thought it sounded odd, maybe like a mardi gras, right? Hit "Enter"...
Had "safe search" off (for other unrelated reasons in an earlier search).
Am still applying bleach to my visual cortex, every 10 minutes.
A week after the accidental exposure.
OMG.
But these days Google seems to be more discreet; its suggestions don't come up like that. Whew!!
> You’ll see how wholesome and conservative they are.
Umm, those aren't exactly the adjectives I'd choose... :)
Only a homosexual could be that insanely rude an the owner of the establishment.
And “camp” (camp_steveo) is a word that identifies homosexuals.
ex: steveo is camp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.