Posted on 12/06/2011 9:24:46 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
There are many reasons to think Ron Paul is a bottom feeder. He refuses to support a Constitutional amendment to protect normal, heterosexual marriage. He voted to turn the United States military into a San Francisco bath house by repealing DADT. He wants to see drugs and prostitution legalized. He thinks Islamo-Nazi Iran should have a nuclear weapon. He surrounds himself with lunatics like Cindy Sheehan's love slave, Screwy Lewy Rockwell. In general, there isn't a sewer RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) isn't too proud to hunt for food in.
Then, there's this. From CBS News:
***********************************
"Libertarian Congressman Ron Paul is breaking with many of his fellow Republicans - among them his son Rand - to support the creation of the planned Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center that has come to be known as the 'ground zero mosque.'
In a statement decrying 'demagogy' around the issue, the former Republican presidential candidate wrote late last week that "the debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque.'
'Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be 'sensitive' requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from 'ground zero,' Paul continues.
He goes on to argue that 'the neo-conservatives' who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia...never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20014453-503544.html
************************************
Yes, I know this is old news. No, I'm not breaking any new ground here. However, since Ol' Ru is running for President, this crap should be revisited. (Even Howard "YEAAAAAAAAH!" Dean thought this was a bad idea.)
I don't want to get involved in the technical legalities about whether or not this House of Hatred should or should not be built, since the developers don't seem to have the money for Lincoln Logs, let alone building a gazillion dollar insult. That was beaten to death last year and I don't feel like rehashing it. What I want to focus on is RuPaul's detestable attitude on the matter. (Which is eerirly similiar to Chariman Obama's and Nazi Pelosi's detestable attitude on the matter.)
The above snippet shows, once again, that RuPaul is NOT a Conservative, regardless of what his drug addict followers claim. He's basically an anarchist, and this little episode proves it.
Now, before we get started, I think it's appropriate to explain what I mean by anarchist. I'm not talking in this sense of a bomb-thowing V For Vendetta type. I'm talking about someone who believes they have the right to do what they please when they feel like doing it. That's what RuPaul is advocating here. This has nothing to do with "neo-conservative" war mongering or the religious rights of Muslims. (This is a bare-bones explanation of RuPaul's mentor Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism, which basically states that society should allow individuals to do as they please as long as they can afford to do so.)
A Conservative doesn't believe in any of the above nonsense. A Conservative is a staunch defender of the individual and his rights, but the Conservative also believes in common sense and morality. For example, a Conservative would defend a bar owner's right to allow smoking in his bar, but a Conservative would fight tooth and nail to stop a strip club from opening next to an elementary school or a church. The Conservative fights for limited government, but never for anarchy. The Conservative also believes that while the individual has rights and those rights should be defended at all costs, the individual should use those rights in a responsible manner. In other words, the Conserative may very well want to give the social finger to the driver of a Smart Car with a "Obama 2012" bumper sticker, but he doesn't because he believes in a polite moral society.
Ladies and gentlemen, yes there's a fine line that often gets blurred when it comes to our rights, and I don't claim to have all the answers. But I will tell you this, I sure do understand our rights better than Ron Paul does.
I, for one would rather concern myself with getting as many chicks as possible than having gay dudes on my mind 24/7. Priorities.
At this point no one who visits FR can pretend ignorance about the whole scope of the homo agenda as you play at. If the fags kept their disgusting habits and practices private, no one would know or care. Except, of course, the large numbers of children and adolescents they molest... But the large point is that the huge federal government and many states have been very busy forcing the agenda on the entire population in schools, now the military for God's sake - this seems to mean nothing to you - in industry, local, state and fedov at all levels force hirelings to approve of, tolerate, learn about every thing "gay" and any dissenting opinions or views are verboten. And much, much more.
I figure you're lying when you claim that the fag agenda does not affect you; the only rational conclusion is that you like it. And one of the favorite fag agenda promoters dirty tactics is one you use - to accuse those opposed to the fag agenda of being perverts themselves, which you are clearly insinuating. The only reason you do this is to shut me up.
I will never shut up.
It doesn't interest you means that it doesn't matter, or iow you don't see it as anything to trouble yourself about, no big deal. Homosexuals in the military - no big deal, etc. In other words, the current status quo of homosexual this and that forced on kids in schools, in the military, and so on is okay with you.
And your claim of being concerned about "the encroaching power of the state" is selective, since it is only the "encroaching power of the state" that is advancing the homo agenda on us all. So THAT aspect of "encroaching power of the state" you're fine with.
Back during my first stint in the uniform, beginning in 1996 just after “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” was signed by Bill Clinton, the homosexuals joined in droves because they thought our military would be an all you could eat meat market.
They didn’t figure that “Don’t ask don’t tell” meant “We’re not going to ask and you STFU about it”.
Well, enter one promising youth straight from indoctrination.
We called him “Bannanasack”, he was a doe eyed creep who couldn’t take “No” for an answer.
He’d jump into the shower with you.
After getting his face pounded to a pulp numerous times, he still didn’t learn.
However, our cadre had this to say about it, “He sure does fall down alot.”
I detest homosexuals for their behavior, and for their lack of respect for others.
I have not met one yet that understood that “No” meant NO instead of “Grab me again in a few minutes”.
Allowing them to serve openly only opens the door for worse.
And homosexuals pretty much one and all are emotionally unstable.
Just the kind of person you want sitting next to you under battlefield stress, right jmc813?
Darks, a goodly number of freepers have written on FR about their experiences with homosexuals in the military, and some to me via freepmail. Each and every experience was parallel with yours - BAD. Some even worse. The only ones who’ve said they had no problem with homosexuals in the military were ones who oddly enough also had no problem with the homo agenda or said “what agenda?”, and also were not conservative in their other viewpoints. On in particular was Drew68, who was banned, but then I saw him again later, so I don’t know his status. But he used to post on some leftist scum site and sneer at FR and freepers.
Doesn’t surprise me one bit, actually.
The idiots who see nothing wrong with homos in the military also see nothing wrong with the Folsom Street Fair OR the toddler fetish gear they have there.
Not surprisingly, they don’t admit that, usually.
Couple years back there was a thread about Disney “Gay Day”.
Well, there were pictures of these people and it looked like Night of the Living Dead.
There were reports from parents who had to fight off the ‘gays’ because the homos were trying to drag children off into the restrooms.
The MSM was silent on this, of course.
If memory serves, the homo apologists were not present on that thread.
Or they kept it down.
Notice how the creeps on this thread all leave when asked direct questions, or called on their dirty tactics or duplicity. They just exit.
And then come back on another thread later, pulling the exact same crap.
Yeah, that’s how it goes.
Remember the misnamed troll JohnGalt?
He’d do the same thing.
Trolls are by definition dishonest. If they weren’t duplicitous and deceitful, they’d get zotted a lot more often. I think they’re getting too many “stop it or else”s. They stop on one thread, and start up on another.
I don’t shill for political candidates. They have their paid campaign flunkies to do that for them.
I don’t read fiction; life’s too short and way too interesting and I just don’t have time. I do have a set of Dickens in case I want fiction. Although I did read Matt Bracken’s trilogy which I highly recommend if you haven’t read it.
Have you read it, Darksheare?
“I find Absolutely Nobama’s presence on FR a wonderful fresh breeze of truth and no holds barred fighting spirit, which is exactly what is needed to try to turn this country around.”
I appreciate that. Thank you, FRiend!
“I don’t care a whit about the homos. I have better things to do than fret about gay people.”
You most certainly do.
“Hate. Hate. Hate. Hate.
My USNA’s sponsor’s brother was a swift boat officer in Vietnam. More medals for heroism than you have teeth in your head. Real heroism, too, not the Long John Kerry kind. Gay man.”
A little piece of advice for you, bunkie: Never mess with anyone who’s smarter than you and has a photographic memory.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2803496/posts?q=1&;page=351
Do not, under circumstances, attempt to play the “Absolutely Nobama is not a patriot! Look he’s talking smack about a decorated war hero” card. In fact, let’s remove him from the story and look at what’s left.
“Hate. Hate. Hate. Hate.”
“Gay man”
Reading between the lines: “Look at all you bigots! How dare you speak ill of homosexuality.” (With all the leftist hissing and scratching that goes along with it.)
I love the smell of burnt paleocon in the morning....
Ernest Hemingway.. what to say about him.
He was actually a lunatic, and a lib.
His whole family are loons.
His writing was banal, droning, and insipid.
And he died a selfish cowardly death.
But, he knew what gunpowder tasted like for a brief second.
Now there’s a writer worth idolising!
Right?
Hemingway wrote his last book, The Old Man and the Sea, while in Cuba in the 1950’s.
That should tell you alot about him.
He’s very popular among lefties for some reason.
I guess when you have a character talking to his hand while out in a boat they love it.
Haven’t had a chance to read Mr. Bracken’s books yet.
I’m told that I’m missing alot.
You and your little sewing circle can obsess over homosexuals all you want. Go right ahead; it's a free country. I just don't want any part of it. My interests are in political philosophy; chiefly, the proper relationship between the government and the governed. I merely jumped in on these threads because I find it amusing that you and your sewing circle obsess about a completely non-viable presidential candidate like Ron Paul, but eventually all threads lead to homos with you guys. So be it.
You may "love the smell of burnt paleocon in the morning . . " but I submit that's your own halitosis blowing back into your nostrils.
My very best to you and your sewing circle this Christmas season. Peace and love, and have a wonderful life. I won't mock you any more.
“You and your little sewing circle can obsess over homosexuals all you want. Go right ahead; it’s a free country. I just don’t want any part of it.”
Yeah, that’s a real Conservative attitude.
I never read fiction but I read those books and highly recommend them. We bought a set and had them sent to our County Sheriff’s office. They’re reading them.
Sounds as though I missed nothing by not reading his books! (I’m a high school dropout so I was never forced to read them. But I was forced to read “Great Expeectations” which was a horribly depressing book.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.