Posted on 12/06/2011 9:24:46 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
Attacking the enemy in wartime is moral.
The “who cares what your sexual preference is” is nonsense because the men and women in uniform are now stuck with very close association with homosexuals even though the majority of those serving did NOT want to, thanks to Ron Paul and eveyrone else who voted to allow mentally ill sex perverts in the military!
Oh yeah...I’m scared to detail my opinion...LMAO
Like I said, it doesn’t matter what I think about DADT.
I served 6 long years in the US Army Infantry, and my position is that I follow the orders of the officers appointed over me.
There are gays in the military now, and there were gays before DADT was repealed.
Do you think the US military is weak now?
I dunno. I was hoping you knew, especially if there’s a check with my name on it waiting for me there.
Don’t want federal laws banning homosexuality.
I also do NOT want laws FORCING us to accept them or their perversions. I do NOT want hate crime laws for speaking out about their sinful, godless, immoral, unwholesome, unhealthy repugnant acts and lifestyles. I do NOT want laws banning preachers or the bible for speaking out against homosexualism. I do NOT want laws forcing us to accept homosexuals, lesbians, bi-sexuals, transgenders, etc, into our businesses, our schools, our churches, our military, our scouting clubs, our associations, our society, etc, against our wishes. There is no authority in the constitution for the federal government to stick its nose into societal issues! In fact, it restricts them from doing so.
Using government FORCE to do this is NOT FREEDOM!! It’s TYRANNY!!
I hope not.
“Too many here use the same shout down tactics that progressives use. I don’t have the time or patience for that crap”
_____________________________________________________
It’s true. I am looking for honest debate.
I am searching for the truth.
When I get shouted down, it just pisses me off. How is that helpful to anyone’s cause?
If you’re going to push homosexuals in the military, go elsewhere to do it. It’s not appreciated and not wanted here. Continue doing so and we will part company.
Ron Paul would destroy this country if elected.
He will probably destroy it by diverting enough votes with a third party run.
I have been amazed that no one has mentioned that Saturday night Paul repeatedly advocated the Doctrine of Nullification.
I thought that issue was settled by the Civil War.
bye
Agreed 1000% Especially when it comes to telling private institutions who they MUST marry together like the situation is in England.
It is the heavy handed Nanny state crap that is forcing soverign individuals to think they are constantly guilty of “thought crimes” that should be thrown out.
Overwise we will end up like Canada and the UK and just thinking outside the “PC norm” will get you jail time....
The Paulbots will NEVER understand this.
It’s not my business to allow others to force their perverted lack of morality on me either.
Your made up homosexual rights stop where my very real unalienable rights begin!
Take your support for extra-constitutional “homosexual rights” elsewhere or suffer the zot!
Last warning.
I'm not making excuses for this vote. I would not have made the same decision. However, I'm not a single issue voter.
Oh yeah...Im scared to detail my opinion...LMAO
Like I said, it doesnt matter what I think about DADT.
I served 6 long years in the US Army Infantry, and my position is that I follow the orders of the officers appointed over me.
There are gays in the military now, and there were gays before DADT was repealed.
Do you think the US military is weak now?
So, you are too chicken to answer a simple question. I’ll try again:
Should homosexuals be allowed to serve openly in the military, a simple “YES” or a simple “NO”?
It’s really not complicated.
Paul should not be allowed to run on the GOP at all he is more liberal on certain social and international issues than most Dems.
Why he’s allowed to spew his liberal crap on our ticket is beyond me.
IOW, it’s no big deal to you, a small matter. Nothing, really. So homosexuals in the military is a non-issue to you. Got it.
so where is the line then?
Shall we let two adults do what they want with each other, hey a mother can marry her daughter, no well why not a woman marrying 9 men at once.after all using your logic we can’t enforce morals.
No there is a line, on one side anything goes which the left want and on the other side is marriage between a man and a woman.
Yep.
Ron Paul is to Conservative like kitten is to pass rush specialist.
But, then there is that whole morality thing?!? Those federal laws are OK, right? The role of the federal government, as outlined by the Constitution, leaves these matters at the state level. Desiring to leave the federal government out of the issue is not the same as accepting it.
yea freedom
hey let mothers marry their daughters, men have 9 wives, get rid of the age for sex for those homosexuals to have sex wiht little boys, , what why not the boy aged 17 wants sex.
So much for the freedom you want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.