Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Candidate: Meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio Yielded “Devastating” Information
The Post and Email ^ | December 9, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 12/10/2011 9:50:48 PM PST by Seizethecarp

On December 5, 2011, Presidential Candidate John Dummett of California recently traveled 789 miles to Maricopa County, AZ and back to meet with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has been conducting an investigation into questions surrounding the presidential eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.

"Arpaio was intrigued by Van Irion’s and my approach of going after the DNC and not attacking Barack Obama or asking any court to decide Obama’s eligibility. He told us things that I still have to hold in confidentiality. I can say, because it has already been released to the press and I can verify it, that he will produce a report in February, and it will be devastating. I can’t say what it is, but I know what it is.”

When we asked Dummett if the “devastating” part of Arpaio’s future report was communicated in written or verbal form, he was not at liberty to answer.

"Instead of being there for only 20 minutes, we were there speaking with him for an hour and a half. I was then asked to be an expert witness on the birth certificate issue, and I agreed to do that.”

The Post & Email asked, “Is that because you have a background in document analysis or something similar?” and Mr. Dummett replied, “I’m a computer programmer staff analyst for the California Department of Fish & Game. I’m an expert at the staff level at building databases and dealing with computer-generated documents. I figured out that the birth certificate Obama presented was a phony right after I saw it, because I understand how Adobe works because I have to use that and the applications which I built for the state of California.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: arizona; arpaio; az; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; sheriffjoe; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-145 next last
To: PA-RIVER
Our Indonesian president put Mr. Lakin in prison for refusing to follow his orders. You are correct.

Lakin kind of did that to himself.

51 posted on 12/11/2011 7:33:51 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
They put Lakin in Leavenworth for refusing to obey the lawful orders of his superior officers. Something Lakin admitted and plead guilty to.

Yes he did. After they REFUSED to allow him to use his actual defense.

52 posted on 12/11/2011 7:34:19 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

“We can’t blame the officers that put Lakin in Jail. They were answering to an Indonesian president. “

I guess we know where their allegiance is and it’s not with the Constitution.

“enemies, foreign or domestic”


53 posted on 12/11/2011 7:34:25 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
A Sheriff and 300 posse members. Reminds me of Butch Cassidy.

The last video I saw of Obama he almost started to laugh near the end of the video address to American people. He knows its all a ruse. I have never seen a president so flippant and disconnected. But hey, maybe this is how Indonesian residents behave? What do I know?

54 posted on 12/11/2011 7:35:04 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
Truth hurt?

You tell me. Now that I have exposed your attempt to malign and misinformed, does it sting a bit?

I hope when the truth comes out about Obama, he and his enablers hurt like a sonnafabich.

55 posted on 12/11/2011 7:38:07 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
True, we can't expect our Indonesian president to protect American troops.

Rather foolish for Lakin to expect an Indonesian president to open his documents. That's something an American president would do.

56 posted on 12/11/2011 7:40:53 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Most Obots crap on the street at OWS locations. They use their pants to wipe clean. They really don't understand that an Indonesian president is illegal.

I don't think they know what they believe. If someone would create an "Occupy Wall Street" X-Box game then they would never leave home and we wouldn't have to deal with them.

57 posted on 12/11/2011 7:41:35 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

If the RNC nominates a moron, I wonder if a joe run as a third could be sucessfull, unfortunately, probably not.... and would end with the usurper with another 4 years...


58 posted on 12/11/2011 7:43:33 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
If he did then it won't work. The courts have ruled that Alan Keyes didn't have standing to challenge Obama's eligibility, and he certainly stood a better chance of winning in 2008 than this Dummett has in 2012.

He can challenge his access to the ballot prior to the election. He could do it in state courts on a state by state basis if necessary. It only takes one win to cause a major media problem. The public won't understand how Obama could be excluded in one state and will want an explanation, then obama's "got some splannin' to do." I doubt he could survive it. We may get to see Pelosi and Reid in Jail, where it seems most Democrat politicians (and a lot of their constituents) belong.

59 posted on 12/11/2011 7:45:19 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Yes he did. After they REFUSED to allow him to use his actual defense.

Which was what? Obama was illegitimate? He may well be, but the officers whose orders Lakin refused to obey were legitimate and the orders were legal. That is what Lakin was charged with and that's what he admitted he was guilty of. He thought that he could make it all about Obama. But because of the way he chose to pursue that goal, he gave the Army the opportunity to charge him with crimes that had nothing to do with Obama and everything to do with good order and discipline. So Lakin's mistakes started long before he dreamed up his defense.

60 posted on 12/11/2011 7:47:49 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
Which was what? Obama was illegitimate?

No, that his legitimacy had not been demonstrated.

He may well be, but the officers whose orders Lakin refused to obey were legitimate and the orders were legal.

Lawyer types may be enamored of this sophistry, but as we found out in Nuremburg, Officers are responsible for their own conduct and cannot use the excuse "we were only following orders." It is the Duty of each officer to uphold the Constitution. The fact that those above him shirked their duty does not excuse those below them for shirking theirs.

That is what Lakin was charged with and that's what he admitted he was guilty of.

He admitted he was guilty of it the same way Gallileo admitted the universe was geocentric. Under duress. When he realized that he was facing something like a Volksgerichtshof, he decided to cut his losses.

He thought that he could make it all about Obama. But because of the way he chose to pursue that goal, he gave the Army the opportunity to charge him with crimes that had nothing to do with Obama and everything to do with good order and discipline.

It is not in the interest of good order and discipline to allow the troops to wonder if your forces have been co-opted by an Enemy Agent in a high position of command. Had everyone else not been so tolerant of that obfuscating little snake wiggling his way through the legal technicalities, we would have had the answer BEFORE the ELECTION, and he wouldn't even BE a Precedent.

So Lakin's mistakes started long before he dreamed up his defense.

Lakin's mistake was in assuming that his superiors had honor, rather than being the career whores that they now so obviously are. This is the same problem we ran into in Vietnam. The Officers should have resigned en masse, rather than put up with Johnson and McNamara's sh*t.

They didn't have the guts to stand with Lakin, so they sold the better man down the river.

61 posted on 12/11/2011 8:09:18 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“Lakin’s mistake was in assuming that his superiors had honor, rather than being the career whores that they now so obviously are.

They didn’t have the guts to stand with Lakin, so they sold the better man down the river.”

Beautiful post. Excellent.


62 posted on 12/11/2011 8:15:31 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Sharon Rondeau & Presidential Candidate John Dummett should really just be quite and let us all learn sometime in February.


63 posted on 12/11/2011 8:24:09 AM PST by urtax$@work (The only kind of memorial is a Burning memorial !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

The operant phrase is ‘abstract of a long form BC’. The state of Hawaii has not authorized the INternet ‘abstract’ as exactly what was copied from thier files and carried to the White Hut bassturd, so the abstract was always a ploy to deceive the People. But then what would we the people expect from the criminal enterprise democrap party?


64 posted on 12/11/2011 8:26:15 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
“And he still has a government job? Interesting.”

If Gov. Brown's minions tried to take him down, it might give him “standing” to defend his allegation that Obama was illegally placed on state ballots, including CA’s!

65 posted on 12/11/2011 8:42:13 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG; LucyT
“Eeh, no big deal — Bambi is nothing but a Brit, that’s all.”

For O’Bambi to be a Brit, we must have an authenticated image of his hard copy 1961 LFBC from somewhere (HI?, Kenya?)...which we DO NOT have, IMO.

Therefore we do not know who his legal or biological father (or mother) was at birth (jus sanguinus) or where he was born (jus soli).

Therefore we do not know if O’Bambi is or is not a Brit!

Nor do we know whether he was an NBC.

66 posted on 12/11/2011 8:51:06 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
“I’ve read other threads here that claim the real eligibilty issue is that Obama Sr. was a British subject.”

Without an authenticated 1961 BC (which we do NOT have, IMO) BOTH the birth location AND the citizenship of Obama and his parents at birth are EQUALLY “the real eligibility issue.”

Claims that Obama’s birth location “doesn't matter” are FALSE, because Article II requires “birth in the country” according to Minor v. Happersett’s explicit definition of NBC in addition to parents who are citizens.

67 posted on 12/11/2011 9:03:24 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
“Watch out for Hillary and Soros. They are waiting in the wings.”

I have been wondering whether the delay to February has something to do with waiting until after it would be more difficult in some way for Hillary to get into big state primaries, but I don't think that partisan games are what Joe Arpaio is about.

68 posted on 12/11/2011 9:08:36 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici; LucyT

Investigators are going at it from all angles and the winner is yet to be determined.

If anyone in Congress was honest we wouldn’t have to go through all this.


69 posted on 12/11/2011 9:59:26 AM PST by Lady Jag (Laws are spider webs through which the big flies pass and the little ones get caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stormhill; LucyT; WhizCodger
“It’s very exciting to have the prospect of shining (at long last) some sunlight on Obama, but come February Joe better produce some logical justification for not having released the information in December.”

I have been wondering what type of evidence would require a legitimate delay until February.

Because Arpaio is a straight shooter and not a game player, in my assessment, WITNESS TESTIMONY comes to mind as a possibility, especially testimony from a foreign witness (Kenyan?) who might not be expected to be in a secure location (coming from Kenya to Arizona and the watchful eye of Sheriff Arpaio?) until early February.

A hint that the evidence that Arpaio disclosed to Dummett concerned positive proof of a foreign birth (likely Kenya) comes in this quote from the article: "So they’re most certainly not going to recuse themselves over the impeachment of Obama. So if he gets off scot-free, then everything he’s done is set in stone; we’ve set precedent, and that means that anybody who was born outside of this country can come over here and be president."

Dummett said this RIGHT AFTER seeing or hearing about Arpaio's "devastating" evidence. Note that Kenyan birth documents can ONLY be authenticated by Kenyan authorites who could easily be corrupted by the $ millions available to the Obama cabal...but an incorruptible Kenyan witness with character (what a concept!) if they could make it to a safe location in the US long enough to give a deposition on video and perhaps bring along contemporaneous documentary or photographic evidence, would indeed be devastating. Totally speculative, of course, but I can hope!

70 posted on 12/11/2011 10:01:52 AM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

The congresscritters will do nothing. The files/info their political enemies have on them is kryptonite.


71 posted on 12/11/2011 10:37:04 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I wouldn’t say Arpaio had anything to do with Hillary. It’s about Hillary wanting something she can’t have.


72 posted on 12/11/2011 11:38:00 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
I can say, because it has already been released to the press and I can verify it, that he (Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio) will produce a report in February, and it will be devastating. I can’t say what it is, but I know what it is.”

Sheriff Arpaio had better move up the release date as the liberal MSM has already started their smear campaign against him. On the front page of our newspaper yesterday (Saturday) an article authored by the NY Times News Service titled "AZ sheriff now under fire for handling of sex crimes" ... the campaign to denigrate him is under way. Giving them nearly two months more to work their poison pen strategy on Arpaio isn't wise. By February Arpaio's credibility will be in tatters.

73 posted on 12/11/2011 12:07:36 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

sfl


74 posted on 12/11/2011 12:08:40 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

A simple copy wouldn’t have any layers at all though. Truthfully, I never would have expected fraud as blatant and clumsy as we are seeing today on a regular basis. There seems to be little effort to do a professional job of hiding anything.


75 posted on 12/11/2011 12:49:05 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The criminal enterprise plays the race card as a trump to all questions. An affirmative action unmasked commie is in the White House because We The People allowed political correctness and the race card to become more powerful than our sovereignty. If you don't lie on a regular basis, it is shocking to find you are being lied to on a regular basis. We know it now, but will we cancel the trump card and treat the criminals as what they are? ... Sadly,it appears the justice in America is too cancer riddled to function in a healthy fashion. A man who is an identity fraud at the least, and a criminal traitor more likely has come to power because the democrat party and its created dependents lust for handouts and power at any cost, even the death of the Republic.
76 posted on 12/11/2011 1:33:18 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
He can challenge his access to the ballot prior to the election.

I believe that's what Orly Taitz tried in New Hampshire. She was unsuccessful. I don't think Dummert would have any more luck.

77 posted on 12/11/2011 2:32:01 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Now that I have exposed your attempt to malign and misinformed...

Is that what you've been doing?

78 posted on 12/11/2011 2:33:13 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
Rather foolish for Lakin to expect an Indonesian president to open his documents.

Lakin was foolish in a whole lot of ways.

That's something an American president would do.

There have been a number of soldiers in recent memory who wound up on the wrong side of court martials for trying to make the president prove something. Lakin. Michael New. Yolanda Huet-Vaughn. Ehren Watada. It doesn't work very well or, apparently, very often.

79 posted on 12/11/2011 2:36:53 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Hope Sheriff Joe has good security.
80 posted on 12/11/2011 2:40:38 PM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
No, that his legitimacy had not been demonstrated.

To-may-to, to-mah-to.

..., but as we found out in Nuremburg, Officers are responsible for their own conduct and cannot use the excuse "we were only following orders."

And they are also responsible for what happens to them if a court martial finds that the orders they refused to obey were, in fact, legal and the officers who gave them were, in fact, authorized to do so. Lakin decided the orders were invalid. Lakin was wrong. Lakin paid the penalty for his mistake.

He admitted he was guilty of it the same way Gallileo admitted the universe was geocentric. Under duress. When he realized that he was facing something like a Volksgerichtshof, he decided to cut his losses.

In other words, he wimped out?

It is not in the interest of good order and discipline to allow the troops to wonder if your forces have been co-opted by an Enemy Agent in a high position of command.

The Army brass can't be responsible for what the rank and file decide to believe. They can ensure that lawful orders are followed and the chain of command is respected.

Lakin's mistake was in assuming that his superiors had honor, rather than being the career whores that they now so obviously are.

Lakin only wishes he had the honor that someone like Gordon Roberts had.

81 posted on 12/11/2011 2:45:21 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
I don't think that partisan games are what Joe Arpaio is about.

It's about getting at the truth and taking down the man who had to audacity to sue his state.

82 posted on 12/11/2011 2:54:42 PM PST by jersey117 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
>>The Army brass can't be responsible for what the rank and file decide to believe. They can ensure that lawful orders are followed and the chain of command is respected.<<

The rank and file are enlisted men, *not officers*

The officer oath:

I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God

The enlisted man's oath:-

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

The usurpation of the chain of command by a non US citizen would be an action by a domestic enemy. If Lakin suspected this, and exhausting all other effective means he was IMHO acting within his officer Oath to challenge his orders.

83 posted on 12/11/2011 3:22:57 PM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
.

> Ping

. . . . . Back to the thread.

Check out # 25 , 27 , 30 ,

Then, on second page, see:

# 52 , 61 , 70 , 73 , 76 .

Beware of persuasive SP; he's good at misconstruing facts.

84 posted on 12/11/2011 3:45:42 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

It’s called Photoshop. And anyone that really works with it does not refer to it as Adobe. Adobe is the company name. They make a bunch of software—most notably photoshop and flash.

They don’t make databases. There is very little in common with databases and photoshop.

If they are using this guy as an expert, the credibility is suspect.


85 posted on 12/11/2011 3:54:03 PM PST by Vermont Lt (I just don't like anything about the President. And I don't think he's a nice guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
So why didn’t someone PRINT OUT the electronically generated birth certificate (the long form that we were assured doesn’t exist) and post that online, so we would lose the Photoshop layers that are so damning?

SOMEONE wanted to warn us, in a plausibly deniable way...

86 posted on 12/11/2011 4:10:48 PM PST by null and void (Day 1055 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes arent made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Soros does not want Hillary.


87 posted on 12/11/2011 4:13:58 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I believe the poster is talking having experience with databases, websites and document generation with Adobe Acrobat.

Adobe® Acrobat® X Standard software lets you reliably create, edit, and share basic PDF files. Convert paper documents to searchable PDF files or fillable forms. Merge multiple file types into a single PDF file.

Obama’s posted BC was a PDF file with different layers of graphics from multiple sources. Could be done with Photoshop but the poster probably meant that he is expert in Adobe document standards not Photoshop.

88 posted on 12/11/2011 4:16:11 PM PST by Hang'emAll (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Sometimes the most obvious clue is in front of us, and we overlook it because of disinformation.

SAD disappeared from sight in Hawaii around April 1961. She reappeared in Washington State during August 1991 accompanied by baby Barry, a witness claims.

We know from University of Washington transcripts she took correspondence courses for two years.

Why, if she was supposedly living in Seattle, WA, would she take correspondence courses? She wouldn’t.

A red herring was thrown out early to throw everyone off the track. It is easy to pay people to lie.

BHO2 wasn’t born in Hawaii nor did he live there until he and his mother popped up there in 1963.

This is why SAD’s passport records prior to 1965 are missing.

This is why BHO2’s incomplete original Hawaiian birth certificate, filled out by his grandmother Maddy Dunham, is labeled “filed” rather than “accepted and filed”.

This is why BHO2 sent a million dollars to Odinga, not to run for political office, but to intimidate and terrorize Christian missionaries in Kenya who knew the truth about Obama.

Note: when the White House presented Obama’s “birth certificate” they included the exact time of BHO2’s birth as exists on his BC from Kenya.

This was done to be cheeky or it was done because it is true.


89 posted on 12/11/2011 4:16:23 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp; Lancey Howard; Irish Eyes; Ditter; SoJoCo
Who is presidential candidate Dummet?

Apparently, he is the person who has that most precious and elusive thing a loyal American can possibly have: "Standing".

90 posted on 12/11/2011 4:26:25 PM PST by null and void (Day 1055 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes arent made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Apparently, he is the person who has that most precious and elusive thing a loyal American can possibly have: "Standing".

Don't put money on that. If the courts can rule that Alan Keyes didn't have standing, and he was actually on the ballot in a couple of states in 2008, then how can Dummett have standing?

91 posted on 12/11/2011 5:09:40 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
If Lakin suspected this, and exhausting all other effective means he was IMHO acting within his officer Oath to challenge his orders.

The Army apparently did not share your opinion.

92 posted on 12/11/2011 5:12:31 PM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Canadian birth is my guess. His Aunt lived 5 minutes from the border in Washington. Maybe the hospital at White Rock Canada has a patient list with A. Dunham on it.

I think you are right. They are taking time, and this means they have evidence and they are now verifying all the associated details, and following new leads. Nails for the coffin. They don't want to get caught with a fraudulent document, so they need to verify all people involved do indeed exist. Forensic analysis also takes time. Ink and paper tests. Signatures. Building a case. This is what prosecutors and detectives do.

I think Arpio said it will be shocking and controversial. This guy says devastating. This is looking like good news for America and the cause for freedom. It is amazing that this is happening without any MSM attention focused on it.

93 posted on 12/11/2011 6:02:31 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; Seizethecarp; LucyT

Hillary’s campaign re-emerging, as reports have it, is not to challenge Obama. It is to fill the void when Obama is finally outed. Hillary has been adamant about NOT running. I mean she has at times pretty much closed the door as they say. But with the recent revelations that have been getting more attention since the NH battle, it seems clear that they are now realizing that he could go down and they need a replacement.


94 posted on 12/11/2011 6:37:00 PM PST by GregNH (One Pissed Off Natural Born Citizen OPONBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Bush released all his military records. Being open and honest was routine.


95 posted on 12/11/2011 6:42:53 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
The MSM has covered the Arpaio Posse with Alinski-style mocking but not to the extent Arpaio is used to having.

The latest MSM tactic is to hype a ginned-up claim that Arpaio “botched” over 400 reported sex-crime cases back in 2007. They are really digging to find something and the claims against Arpaio came up empty or they wouldn't be trying to revive them.

AP:”Critics: ‘Tough’ sheriff botched sex-crime cases”

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/12/04/critics_tough_sheriff_botched_sex_crime_cases/?page=1

96 posted on 12/11/2011 7:02:14 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
They are grasping at straws.

The sheriff tends to shoot straight.

My money is on Joe kicking Barak square in the jewels.

97 posted on 12/11/2011 7:31:26 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Seizethecarp: “I have been wondering what type of evidence would require a legitimate delay until February.”

I notice that the Arizona primary is scheduled for Feb. 28 so perhaps the sheriff is merely treating this as his deadline to have results. I would guess he’s attempting to amass as much information and justification possible to be sure the accusations stick. And there are always chances that more investigation will provide even greater findings than those that are “devastating”? Even though time is an enemy, poor investigating techniques and compromised evidence is even more so...


98 posted on 12/11/2011 7:56:33 PM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

Imagine having Plugs as your candidate. Talk about a disaster....


99 posted on 12/11/2011 8:24:49 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; stormhill; LucyT; WhizCodger

Witnesses that should be deposed.

Brian Schatz - Current Lt. Gov. of Hawaii. HDP leader in 2008. Question to Mr. Schatz - “Why was document that did not have all the legal requirements of certifying a candidate eligible submitted to CEO in 2008? Why was language included in 2004 that met state law requirements ommitted in 2008? Is it because you did not want to be charged with aiding in fraud?”

Janice Okubo - Too many questions to list in one posting.

Joe Miller - formlerly with Factcheck. Question to Mr. Miller - “Was your job at CBO provided in exchange for supplying the ‘Born in the USA’ Factcheck posting?”

Jess Henig - formerly with Factcheck. Question to Ms. Henig - “When (specific date) did you actually take picture of the short form COLB? Whose camera was used? Why was the date and time not checked before taking the pictures? Did someone provide you with the digital photo files and ask you to write a story around them?”

William H Gilardy, Jr. - Attorney for Stanley Ann Dunham in her divorce from Obama Sr and HDP attorney. Question - “What is the truth. You had direct access to records that are in question as part of the divorce settlement.” Follow-up: “Did you advise Brian Schatz to not sign a document attesting to the Constitutionally eligiblity of Obama?”


100 posted on 12/11/2011 8:32:14 PM PST by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson