Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Candidate: Meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio Yielded “Devastating” Information
The Post and Email ^ | December 9, 2011 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 12/10/2011 9:50:48 PM PST by Seizethecarp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-145 next last
So far Arpaio has said that his report on Obama's eligibility will "shock" and be "controversial." Now Dummett, who claims to have seen some of the evidence, calls it "devastating"! It will be interesting to see whether Perry, endorsed recently by Arpaio, has also seen this evidence and will use it.
1 posted on 12/10/2011 9:50:52 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

For me, shock, controversial and devastating information about BO’s eligibility would be that he is actually eligible.


2 posted on 12/10/2011 9:54:43 PM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
I’m a computer programmer staff analyst for the California Department of Fish & Game. I’m an expert at the staff level at building databases and dealing with computer-generated documents. I figured out that the birth certificate Obama presented was a phony right after I saw it, because I understand how Adobe works because I have to use that and the applications which I built for the state of California.

And he still has a government job? Interesting.

3 posted on 12/10/2011 9:58:22 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Eeh, no big deal — Bambi is nothing but a Brit, that’s all.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2818858/posts

Now let’s see what our spineless congresscritters are going to do if anything needs to be done.


4 posted on 12/10/2011 9:58:59 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; WhizCodger

ping...

Arpaio posse evidence witness says it is “devastating.”


5 posted on 12/10/2011 9:59:38 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I’ve read other threads here that claim the real eligibilty issue is that Obama Sr. was a British subject.


6 posted on 12/10/2011 10:01:37 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Go Joe Go!


7 posted on 12/10/2011 10:02:08 PM PST by GreatRoad (O < 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Well, personally, I would be eager to know what Arpaio’s investigators have found out.


8 posted on 12/10/2011 10:02:13 PM PST by pbmaltzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Watch out for Hillary and Soros. They are waiting in the wings.


9 posted on 12/10/2011 10:02:39 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

It’s very exciting to have the prospect of shining (at long last) some sunlight on Obama, but come February Joe better produce some logical justification for not having released the information in December.


10 posted on 12/10/2011 10:03:51 PM PST by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

That would be very devastating.


11 posted on 12/10/2011 10:07:39 PM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Presidential Candidate John Dummett

Huh?

12 posted on 12/10/2011 10:10:39 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Photobucket
13 posted on 12/10/2011 10:26:19 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I think they are going after Reid and Pelosi, the two who certified Obama’s eligibility. As odd as it may sound I think it will be easier to prove they KNEW he was not eligible and certified him anyhow.

So they will be going after Obama’s Democrat cronies and not Obama, taking away any propaganda the Democrats would produce to defend Obama “against the Republicans”.

A brilliant plan actually.


14 posted on 12/10/2011 10:28:04 PM PST by VeniVidiVici ("Si, se gimme!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

So why didn’t someone PRINT OUT the electronically generated birth certificate (the long form that we were assured doesn’t exist) and post that online, so we would lose the Photoshop layers that are so damning?


15 posted on 12/10/2011 10:37:46 PM PST by donmeaker (e is trancendental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

That would be even better.

Even if Obama pardons them, he’s lost their cover.
You could conceivably see some MSM personalities being dragged into this. Some of the MSM has to know things about Obama that would have derailed any other candidate.


16 posted on 12/10/2011 10:44:07 PM PST by Jonty30 (If a person won't learn under the best of times, then he must learn under the worst of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

p_residential Candidate: Meeting with Sheriff Joe Arpaio Yielded “Devastating” Information

. . . . Article, then # 1 , # 4 , # 14.

Thanks, Seizethecarp.

17 posted on 12/10/2011 10:59:39 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Interesting article.

Why have I never heard of Presidential Candidate John Dummett of California ?

I even had to look him up

http://www.johndummett.us/about.html


18 posted on 12/10/2011 11:08:34 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Arpaio’s endorsement of Perry has me REALLY thinking again about Perry.


19 posted on 12/10/2011 11:21:23 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

I know that here in Michigan the only person that can get a birth certificate is the person whos birth cert. it is..


20 posted on 12/11/2011 12:02:49 AM PST by goat granny (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

You know I really want to believe this, but they said the same thing about corsi’s book and it was a massive fail. corsi made bucks stringing ‘believers’ along.
I don’t like it when teases like this are dripped out. It sounds phony. So before I get my hopes up, just gonna wait and see.


21 posted on 12/11/2011 12:21:23 AM PST by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Here is an excellent easy to understand deconstruction of 0bungle's BC.

Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers ) (8 minute video)

22 posted on 12/11/2011 12:32:31 AM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Would this create a crises?

Will laws he signed be challenged?


23 posted on 12/11/2011 12:57:41 AM PST by NoLibZone (Occupy- Proof we are right - They beg for retrun of morality that the left removed from society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
All those adjectives need a subject.

The question is .. WHO will be devastated ? (or what will be?)

24 posted on 12/11/2011 2:25:45 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; All

“I’ve read other threads here that claim the real eligibilty issue is that Obama Sr. was a British subject.”

That has already been established.

I can’t think of any possible new evidence that is needed.

Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as defined by the SCOTUS.

The people who voted for Obama DON’T CARE!!!!!
He was ELECTED DON’T YOU KNOW!!!!!!
In their minds a democratic election trumps all law.
(they don’t have the I. Q. to understand the law anyway)

What Sheriff Joe is doing may be the smartest and best plan; go after the ones in the Democratic Party who put Obama’s name on the ballot. Might I remind you that here in Indiana there have been forged signatures found on the ‘08’ ballot documents.
If we can only get Obama’s name taken off the ballot in a few states then game over!

If Obama is proven a usurper then is every law he signed null and void. In a society that respected rule of law yes.


25 posted on 12/11/2011 3:52:48 AM PST by vanilla swirl (We are the Patrick Henry we have been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
he will produce a report in February,

Maybe he's purchased airtime at halftime during the upcoming Super Bowl to make the announcement.....

26 posted on 12/11/2011 4:07:34 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vanilla swirl
Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as defined by the SCOTUS.

Hence the lack of anything but forged certificates. Add the sealing up of his entire past and it doesn't take a stretch to believe that the "birthers" are correct (along with the "manchurian candidate" folks). We are living this nightmare due to an epic scam.

27 posted on 12/11/2011 4:22:45 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp


28 posted on 12/11/2011 5:46:15 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Cheers!

29 posted on 12/11/2011 6:09:21 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
We were talking about impeachment and why that is not something we want to do with Barack Obama, and here’s the reason why: I’m a scholar, but not in constitutional law; my degree is in archaeology and history. However, my attorney is an expert in that area. The reason is that impeachment is redress only for a legally- elected president.

There shouldn’t be any controversy, because the law is clear. Impeachment isn’t a conviction; impeachment is when they have a trial for the sitting president, and the Senate decides whether or not he’s guilty. If he’s found guilty, he’s thrown out of office, and he can’t hold office anymore; that’s it. If we impeach him and he gets off – and we know he will because he’s appointed two people to the Supreme Court – it will go to the Supreme Court, and those women will not recuse themselves. They haven’t recused themselves from the Obamacare lawsuits, and they should be. So they’re most certainly not going to recuse themselves over the impeachment of Obama. So if he gets off scot-free, then everything he’s done is set in stone; we’ve set precedent, and that means that anybody who was born outside of this country can come over here and be president.

We then discussed whether or not Obama is guilty of treason and the possible penalties. I have not accused Barack Obama of treason, although others have. That doesn’t mean that I don’t have my suspicions. Everyone is entitled to due process of law. Regarding his birth certificate, he hasn’t shown anyone any certification, so I feel quite confident being able to say that he’s a usurper. I’m sure he’s hiding something, but I’m not going to accuse him of treason at this time.

Historically, treason has been punishable by death. One person was upset and thought I was being “too aggressive in defending the Constitution.” I don’t think that is being overly aggressive, because what these people are doing to us now is going to affect our grandchildren and their children, and they’re going to be paying for it. They’re trying to destroy the United States. If you look up the definition of treason, although I’m not accusing Obama of treason, if you wanted to make the case for it, there’s be a pretty good case.

30 posted on 12/11/2011 6:30:32 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I ask all to remember that they put Lt. Col. Lakin in Leavenworth for six months just for asking for proof of eligibility.


31 posted on 12/11/2011 6:37:20 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I have nothing but the utmost respect for Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I want to believe this. However, I’ve never heard of this particular presidential candidate, so I’m not going to get too excited at this point. Instead, I’m going to take a “wait and see” approach.


32 posted on 12/11/2011 6:42:15 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
I hope that Sheriff Joe is still alive in February! Who is presidential candidate Dummet?
33 posted on 12/11/2011 6:43:04 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Presidential Candidate John Dummett

Who?

34 posted on 12/11/2011 6:43:10 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
I ask all to remember that they put Lt. Col. Lakin in Leavenworth for six months just for asking for proof of eligibility.

They put Lakin in Leavenworth for refusing to obey the lawful orders of his superior officers. Something Lakin admitted and plead guilty to.

35 posted on 12/11/2011 6:46:08 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

I knew some (troll) would post this as a reply.

Can’t see the forest for the trees?

Bug off troll.


36 posted on 12/11/2011 6:48:50 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
I knew some (troll) would post this as a reply.

Truth hurt?

37 posted on 12/11/2011 6:49:46 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Hardly.

It’s going to be so enjoyable when all who allowed this treason are held accountable.

It’s coming troll. It’s coming.


38 posted on 12/11/2011 6:52:22 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

“Truth hurt?”

No the truth only hurts the enablers of the greatest fraud ever perpetrated against this country.

We are not going away until all are held accountable.

All the Obama-bot are crapping their pants about now. Too late to jump a sinking ship?


39 posted on 12/11/2011 6:58:36 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Corsi’s book was on the money. It forced Obama’s hand.

The BC is a forgery. Every computer expert who examines it knows this. I have been a Mechanical engineer, electrical engineer, and computer programmer for almost 30 years. I have worked with printers and documents for 25 years. That document is a fraud.

A sheriff is looking into this. A 300 member posse is working on this. This is no joke. The law is closing in on our Indonesian president. I warned all my relatives in the summer of 2008 that Indonesian citizens are not qualified to run for president. The DNC better get ready to field an American.

40 posted on 12/11/2011 7:01:57 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
It’s going to be so enjoyable when all who allowed this treason are held accountable.

I anxiously wait for that to happen.

41 posted on 12/11/2011 7:05:47 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
All the Obama-bot are crapping their pants about now.

Of course they are.

42 posted on 12/11/2011 7:06:46 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
Our Indonesian president put Mr. Lakin in prison for refusing to follow his orders. You are correct.
43 posted on 12/11/2011 7:07:38 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

Did Dummett file to run for POTUS simply to gain standing as an affected party in a potential legal challenge?


44 posted on 12/11/2011 7:08:09 AM PST by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
 

45 posted on 12/11/2011 7:08:38 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo

“I anxiously wait for that to happen.”

Sure you do./s


46 posted on 12/11/2011 7:09:00 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
Most Obots crap on the street at OWS locations. They use their pants to wipe clean. They really don't understand that an Indonesian president is illegal.
47 posted on 12/11/2011 7:15:43 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
We cant blame the officers that put Lakin in Jail. They were answering to an Indonesian president . The buck stops with the man from Jakarta in the Oval Office.

Now, if I'm on a jury in a civil trial, and Lakin is sueing the Indonesian president, I think I would find for Lakin. 200 million would cover his losses.

I don't think this is going to end when Soebarkah leaves the office. I think law suits are coming.

48 posted on 12/11/2011 7:24:57 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
I have nothing but the utmost respect for Sheriff Joe Arpaio. I want to believe this. However, I’ve never heard of this particular presidential candidate, so I’m not going to get too excited at this point. Instead, I’m going to take a “wait and see” approach.

I've never heard of him either, and I suspect he is only a Presidential candidate for the purpose of establishing standing to sue. I doubt the man seriously thinks he can be elected, but as a "candidate" he can claim "injury" and thereby acquire standing to challenge and sue.

It is a tactic.

49 posted on 12/11/2011 7:31:24 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MNGal
Did Dummett file to run for POTUS simply to gain standing as an affected party in a potential legal challenge?

If he did then it won't work. The courts have ruled that Alan Keyes didn't have standing to challenge Obama's eligibility, and he certainly stood a better chance of winning in 2008 than this Dummett has in 2012.

50 posted on 12/11/2011 7:32:53 AM PST by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson