Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blogger can't get his facts straight, so I yanked his misleading headline and zotted his sorry rump
Deleted | Sunday, December 18, 2011 | BC

Posted on 12/18/2011 1:55:50 PM PST by conservativeBC

Edited on 12/18/2011 2:09:21 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

I predicted a month back that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.

In Iowa, Bachmann and Santorum will do better than some RINO pundits predict...not gonna endorse until I'm enthused, but I'm not enthused enough yet with the field

--------------------------------------------------

Note: I tried to post the video, but it would not show up? I would rather make a posting that you could read from here in it's entirety, as not to be accused of blog pimping.

I tried several different types of codes but none of them would work on this forum.

Can you not post videos here? After I better understand how to post here I won't post another link like this.

For now if you want to watch the Palin video you will have to click this link.

[link removed by moderator]


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; blogboyfail; blogpimp; blogzot; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; endorse; feminismisdead; iowa; newt; noromneynothanks; nostealthromney; palin; stenchofromney; victorkilo; zot; zuluoscartango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2011 1:55:59 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Could be the beginning of the end for the Freddie Mac Grinch.
It’s looks clear Newtus Agustus will not be getting Palin’s endorsement.


2 posted on 12/18/2011 2:00:46 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC
In Iowa, Bachmann and Santorum will do better than some RINO pundits predict...not gonna endorse until I'm enthused, but I'm not enthused enough yet with the field

Just damn!

I feel like I have a mind link with that woman with her giving a statement like that!

I hope she is right.

3 posted on 12/18/2011 2:01:17 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Just post links to the videos.


4 posted on 12/18/2011 2:03:16 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Then again, this blogger - who clearly has an agenda and who clearly launched his website and his membership at FR with one thing in mind - might be fooling you.


5 posted on 12/18/2011 2:03:38 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC
Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

Not that I heard. This line is basically correct:

In Iowa, Bachmann and Santorum will do better than some RINO pundits predict..

RINO pundits, not RINO candidatees.

Don't mislead FReepers with inaccurate blog posts if you want to keep posting here.

6 posted on 12/18/2011 2:05:20 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oKaf7hZDqxQ


7 posted on 12/18/2011 2:05:28 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

It would not be the first time! I’ve been fooled a few times.


8 posted on 12/18/2011 2:05:31 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Here is the video link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oKaf7hZDqxQ

Removing your links so you don’t get blog hits by misleading FReepers.


9 posted on 12/18/2011 2:07:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

HA. ... so much for Mrs. Palin’s unequaled political instincts. Bachman is a loser. She will never be president. Sarah would do the race a great disservice by endorsing Bachmann.

I would expect as much from Sarah. She is now trying to become relevant after she bowed out.


10 posted on 12/18/2011 2:09:49 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC
...that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.

Palin didn't endorse anyone. In fact, she made it quite clear she's NOT endorsing anyone yet.

11 posted on 12/18/2011 2:10:48 PM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright; tennmountainman
Then again, this blogger - who clearly has an agenda and who clearly launched his website and his membership at FR with one thing in mind - might be fooling you.

If you click on the link and listen to what Governor Palin has to say, you'll probably come to the same conclusion as the blogger.
12 posted on 12/18/2011 2:13:09 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Trying to sneak one by on a Sunday afternoon? How’d that work out?


13 posted on 12/18/2011 2:13:22 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
HA. ... so much for Mrs. Palin’s unequaled political instincts. Bachman is a loser. She will never be president. Sarah would do the race a great disservice by endorsing Bachmann.

I would expect as much from Sarah. She is now trying to become relevant after she bowed out.


Except Palin didn't endorse anyone.

Seems like you are the one whose political instincts, and ASSUMPTIONS make you irrelevant.
14 posted on 12/18/2011 2:14:52 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

>> If you click on the link and listen to what Governor Palin has to say, you’ll probably come to the same conclusion as the blogger >>

Ridiculous.
I clicked.
I listened.
I most certainly DID NOT come to that conclusion. Thanks for wasting 6 minutes of my time. She clearly did not endorse anyone, clearly said she was not enthused by any of them yet, clearly made a slam at those currently in office (Perry, Bachmann, Paul) in fact. And yet, said positive things about everyone but Huntsman at some point.

And I really like SP, but she was back on that annoying line of hers “putting government back on the side of the people” thing. How about “getting government the hell outta the way of the people?”


15 posted on 12/18/2011 2:25:04 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Sarah Palin speaks of Bachmann,Santorum,Perry quite clearly as the conservatives in the race.She is holding back on endorsing IMO because Gingrich and Romney are winning.
I disagree with you; Bachmann is not a loser...some of Palin’s fans are SORE losers though.Palin apparently isn’t.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oKaf7hZDqxQ


16 posted on 12/18/2011 2:28:18 PM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

She gives Ron Paul strokes and then, not naming names criticizes Perry.

BAH! What have you done for your state lately St Sarah?

What a bunch of mealy mouthed clap trap.


17 posted on 12/18/2011 2:32:27 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Using RINO to describe an unelected/unelectible professional political pontificator stretches the meaning to the point of evaporation.

Getting back to the basics a RINO is a guy who runs on the Republican ticket but who was a professional politician with a different political party earlier ~ e.g. Ron Paul is a RINO. Jon Huntsman is also a RINO since you necessarily convert to Democrat theology when you take a major ambassadorial assignment from aDemocrat. And there's Perri Caliente! He's a RINO.

Newt is not now nor was he ever a RINO, nor is Mitt.

There are people out there who imagines that ALL the RINOs are Leftwingtards.

They're not.

However, the Leftwingtards are, in fact, Leftwingtards and that's what best describes them.

18 posted on 12/18/2011 2:33:02 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Crap post. Go away troll.


19 posted on 12/18/2011 2:33:09 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I wasn’t trying to sneak anything by.

I said that I predicted that she would endorse Bachmann. I didn’t say that she had.

What the heck are you talking about?

“Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

I predicted a month back that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.”

There is still time.


20 posted on 12/18/2011 2:38:44 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Why are you saying that I said she endorsed someone? I said I predicted that she would. And I did predict that she would.

There is absolutely nothing misleading about what I said.

“Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it.

I predicted a month back that Palin would come out in support of Bachmann before the Iowa caucus.”

There is still time.


21 posted on 12/18/2011 2:38:58 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

You most certainly were and you got caught. It is a rare distinction indeed to be b-tch slapped by a moderator on your headline like that. And nothing changes the fact that you launched your blog site and joined FR for one reason: push Bachmann’s candidacy.

Now that’s fine and its your right - but don’t expect to be taken as seriously as someone who comes for general issue debate. You are pimping, pure and simple.

And if you think Palin called Newt or Mitt RINO’s you did not listen to your own link. She clearly said that MB and RS will do better in Iowa than “RINO PUNDITS” are predicting.


22 posted on 12/18/2011 2:43:00 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I think that you just don’t like that she didn’t include Gingrich our Romney in the conservative category.

And that is why you are claiming that my title was misleading.

Which it clearly was not.


23 posted on 12/18/2011 2:45:15 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Good — as long as people hear her not including Gingrich and Romney in the conservative category


24 posted on 12/18/2011 2:45:27 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

I didn’t say that she did... I said I predicted that she would.

An I dealing with third graders here?


25 posted on 12/18/2011 2:45:47 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC; metmom

Your credibility is shot. You may as well give up now.

*Ping* to Metmom, who loves to see a good zot. No promises Mom, but this one looks dumb enough to keep pushing.


26 posted on 12/18/2011 2:46:22 PM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

thank you


27 posted on 12/18/2011 2:49:25 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I did not once say that she endorsed anyone...

I said that I predicted that she would


28 posted on 12/18/2011 2:49:32 PM PST by conservativeBC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

>> And that is why you are claiming that my title was misleading. Which it clearly was not.>>

It’s a free country, and that means you can continue to claim that the moderator is either a liar or a flake. And you have just reaffirmed that. Your title was misleading - OR YOU ARE impaired when it comes to judgement. The moderator, not me, RULED that your header was misleading. I just happen to agree with the mod. As I suspect do most.

And nothing changes the fact that you are a one trick pony as a poster and a blogger - and nothing changes the fact that I’ve no respect for that. Again, your right, as it is my right not to respect it or think anything you say or post is serious.

I am a big fan of Sarah Palin, but she is not straight down the line conservative herself. I don’t know if her voting record as mayor/governor would equal that of Gingrich’s. So I have no real concern that she mentioned MB and RS as the most conservative. They are that, but they have major problems.


29 posted on 12/18/2011 2:52:52 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

IBTZ.


30 posted on 12/18/2011 2:53:35 PM PST by PalmettoMason ("The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

What was your original header again?


31 posted on 12/18/2011 2:53:57 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
I most certainly DID NOT come to that conclusion. Thanks for wasting 6 minutes of my time. She clearly did not endorse anyone, clearly said she was not enthused by any of them yet, clearly made a slam at those currently in office (Perry, Bachmann, Paul) in fact. And yet, said positive things about everyone but Huntsman at some point.

Then you did not listen very carefully.

She very clearly praised both Bachman and Santorum and had nice things to say about Perry.

There was nothing complimentory said about either Myth or Newt.

And I did not say she endorsed anyone. But she had the most praise for both Santorum and Bachman.
32 posted on 12/18/2011 2:58:47 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Newt is not now nor was he ever a RINO, nor is Mitt.

That is a mind-boggling statement, especially from someone who was so vocal in supporting Sarah.
33 posted on 12/18/2011 3:00:46 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
If you click on the link and listen to what Governor Palin has to say, you'll probably come to the same conclusion as the blogger.

I clicked on the link, listened and came to the same conclusion as the admin mod. The blogger has it wrong.

34 posted on 12/18/2011 3:03:12 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC

Wednesday November 23

Sarah Palin is about to make her endorsement of Michele Bachmann, and she is going to do it in the next couple of weeks.


Dude a couple of weeks have come and gone. What is your next wild?


35 posted on 12/18/2011 3:04:43 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

She also issued a slam at all current office holders in the field, which would include Perry and Bachmann.

Either way, the idea that someone could reach the conclusion of an endorsement is not even close. She clearly likes the positions of MB and RS and clearly has NOT endorsed them so she clearly sees the weaknesses of their candidacies.


36 posted on 12/18/2011 3:04:50 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I'm protecting the language. Either words have meaning or everything is just "poop this" and "poop that".

Stretching RINO to encompass someone who isn't even a politician, nor a government employee, who isn't even known to have a political affiliation IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THE TERM in any venue.

Sarah doesn't appear to understand Southern politics in the age before Reagan. The rest of you guys don't get a pass, and it's time she started learning the terms.

37 posted on 12/18/2011 3:15:41 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
She also issued a slam at all current office holders in the field, which would include Perry and Bachmann.

On this we agree. It would seem her opinion closely mirrors many or our opinions about the lackluster quality of the field of POTUS candidates for 2012.


38 posted on 12/18/2011 3:19:53 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I'm protecting the language. Either words have meaning or everything is just "poop this" and "poop that".

Who died and made you the arbitrator of the term RINO?
39 posted on 12/18/2011 3:20:38 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
I clicked on the link, listened and came to the same conclusion as the admin mod. The blogger has it wrong.

Maybe so, my point was that this statement "Did Palin just call Newt and Mitt RINOs? It sure sounds like it. " in the OP post at the top of the page is pretty accurate given her praise of Bachman and Santorum and the conspicuous lack of praise for either Newt or Myth.
40 posted on 12/18/2011 3:23:25 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You don't need to die to arrange for that to happen ~ it was a vacant job on FR so I took it.

And you, who are you to challenge me?

41 posted on 12/18/2011 3:27:29 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; FreeReign
Following rational analysis she referred to RINO "pundits" ~ she misused the term RINO, but her other word, "pundit", certainly points to a target a tad different than any of the people running for the Republican nomination.

This is EVIDENCE if anything can ever be EVIDENCE concerning use of a word that clarity pays ~ and no, she didn't attack Mitt or Newt.

Remember, Newt is the guy who kicked the Democrats out of control of the House of Representatives where they'd been unchallenged for 40 years.

She did a bit of challenging in Alaska when it came to entrenched power brokers ~ which in her case were apparently corrupt Republicans (one of whom is still a Senator, the wholly execrable Lisa Murkowski).

Now, SoConPubbie, if Sarah is going to run for public office again I want her to have full and correct command of political terminology ~ you may think it's OK for her to go out unprepared but I don't!

42 posted on 12/18/2011 3:33:27 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

She also wisely admitted that endorsements have very limited impact a lot of times. Ironically, due to her unique status and the nature of this race - an endorsement from her at the right time might actually have big time impact.

(for example, an endorsement of RS now might give him much needed legitimacy, or an endorsement of Newt could give him more tea party conservative cred, etc. Not saying she would do either, just thinking out loud about how she might make a difference ironically.)


43 posted on 12/18/2011 3:36:54 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t totally buy our definition, but you are 100% right that it is very misused and over used and quite often abused as a personal rant.

My def would include folks like McCain and Graham and Snowe and others who use their attacks on other Republicans as a way to ingratiate themselves to the liberal media. In other words, these would be Republicans who are DEFINED by their “non” Republicanness or non conservatism. These would also be folks who have never done anything to promote the conservative or base Republican cause.

I think it’s more of a mindset than any particular issue or two.


44 posted on 12/18/2011 3:39:45 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Sarah doesn't appear to understand Southern politics in the age before Reagan.

Sarah's gone dude, so is Bush......hope you get my drift.

45 posted on 12/18/2011 3:42:21 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Don't mislead FReepers with inaccurate blog posts if you want to keep posting here.

This is all the clown does, post something designed to mislead and or be twisted.

His screen name might say conservative, but if he is, it is not reflected via the posts.

46 posted on 12/18/2011 3:49:26 PM PST by USS Alaska (Merry Christmas-Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Sarah doesn't appear to understand Southern politics in the age before Reagan.

OMG, here comes another GOP political historian elitist slapping down anyone who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.......IOW, we're just dumbass FReepers.......

Save your crap for your poly-sci class oh guru, we're not worthy of your historical enlightenment.........


47 posted on 12/18/2011 3:52:02 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Be good, Santa is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

He can sulk back to his blog with no volume of hits outside of FR. Which won’t happen any longer.


48 posted on 12/18/2011 4:10:19 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: conservativeBC


Looks like meat's back on the menu boys!!!
49 posted on 12/18/2011 4:21:02 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

LOL. Good shot!


50 posted on 12/18/2011 4:23:22 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson