Libertarianism all boils down to free sex and drugs.
1 posted on
12/30/2011 4:25:21 PM PST by
grumpa
To: grumpa
And Republicanism boils down to progressive light, NOT heavy.
2 posted on
12/30/2011 4:29:19 PM PST by
nomad
To: grumpa
Ron Paul's Crazy?
Crazy? I Was Crazy Once!
3 posted on
12/30/2011 4:33:07 PM PST by
SkyDancer
("If You Want To Learn To Love Better, You Should Start With A Friend Who You Hate")
To: grumpa
Libertarianism all boils down to free sex and drugs.
_____________________________________________________
No it boils down to the Bill of Rights, for which we can thank our Libertarian founders for.
4 posted on
12/30/2011 4:34:32 PM PST by
JohnKinAK
To: grumpa
The basis for libertarianism is the single precept, "Initiate no force against another". Like the premise of Christianity, it has been misused by many and strictly observed by few. To take taxes from a supposedly free person is to initiate force against that person; to defend oneself is not to initiate force. To arrest some fool for smoking dope is to initiate force in an attept to keep him from making stupid choices. That's none of my business; let the fool smoke dope, that's why they call it that.
You don't have yo agree with it but it doesn't hurt to understand it a bit.
5 posted on
12/30/2011 4:36:17 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(No wonder this administration favors abortion; everything they have done is an abortion)
To: grumpa
Not quite as nutty and dangerous as his flying spam monkeys!
9 posted on
12/30/2011 4:46:32 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: grumpa
Ron Paul's libertarianism is insanity? Take a look at what we have already.
The Obama/Cass Sunstein libertarian paternalism
I don't want to miss the opportunity to mention what the behavioral economists loosed upon us by Obama are doing; to wit, the czars and their fetters.
Obama's regulatory czar Cass R. Sunstein writes:
"The idea of libertarian paternalism might seem to be an oxymoron, but it is both possible and legitimate for private and public institutions to affect behavior while also respecting freedom of choice."
more..
"Often people's preferences are ill-formed . . . In these circumstances, a form of paternalism cannot be avoided [to overcome the decision-makers' limited knowledge and just plain stupidity otherwise known as] bounded rationality . . . libertarian paternalists should attempt to steer people's choices in welfare-promoting directions without eliminating freedom of choice . . . It is also possible to show how a libertarian paternalist might select among the possible options and to assess how much choice to offer." [End of quotes]
IOW Cass R. Sunstein and the Obamanists decide the options from among which you are permitted to choose. You get to be a libertarian! and they get to be the slave masters. What a deal!
BTW, Sunstein has in the past specifically condemned Free Republic as bad for democracy.
13 posted on
12/30/2011 5:01:51 PM PST by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: grumpa
They talk a good talk, but vices are the only thing they ever seem to be willing to go to war for.
To: grumpa
They talk a good talk, but vices are the only thing they ever seem to be willing to go to war for.
To: grumpa
When pressed on this issue and other similar issues, Paul says that the states should have no such laws either!If this is true, then Ron Paul is a NAMBLA man. Any Paul supporters have any comment on this charge?
To: grumpa
Libertarianism is far out! A twelve year old girl should be able to live with a pimp, sell her body, and use the proceeds to purchase heroin (after her pimp takes a percentage, that is).
Don Feder suggested that Walt Disney's Goofy cartoon character would vote libertarian if he could.
23 posted on
12/30/2011 5:48:24 PM PST by
Stepan12
To: grumpa
The one thing that Jesus really got angry about was hypocrisy. Ron Paul loads bills he knows will pass with pork for his district and then votes against it.
I don't know if he is an anti-semite but his policies would lead to the total isolation of Israel and leave them at the mercy of the nut job islamofacists around them.
It is inconsistent to be against murder and allow abortion.
He is the one candidate who could not be Obama.
If he runs 3rd party we will know for sure he is more interested in himself than the country.
29 posted on
12/30/2011 8:38:10 PM PST by
Englishman
(Thank you America)
To: grumpa
The Ron Paul supporters I’ve met are heavy drug users.
Why wouldn’t they like him?
To: grumpa
He is an active pork obtainer and sees this as consistent with his other views.
Could be a problem if sharia law is ever imposed here ...
Otherwise, this could have been phrased differently.
61 posted on
12/31/2011 9:52:15 AM PST by
x
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson