Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!
My utter disdain for Mitt Commie and RuPaul | 01/05/12 | Alan Levy

Posted on 01/04/2012 9:28:40 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama

I must say, the 2012 Iowa Caucus was magnificent.

ABSOLUTELY magnificent.

You see, the good guys won for a change.

Mitt Commie failed and Jew hater Ron Paul was delivered a staggering defeat.

Now, before we get started, let's get a few things clear. Number one, I don't shill for candidates. I have my favorite candidate and you have yours. In this column, I will never tell you who to vote for. I will always tell you who I think is pond scum (like Mitt Commie, like former Obama syocphant Jon Huntsman, and last, and certainly least, Stormfront candidate Ron Paul), but I will never tell you who to vote for. (You're an adult, I trust you'll act accordingly.) Number two, I am fully aware that the Iowa Caucus is not that big of a deal. There's no need to remind me of that. (If you don't believe me, ask President Huckabee.)

The failure of Mitt Commie was mind boggling. Here was a guy with a campaign budget that was bigger than the GDP of El Salvador, who had been campaigning since John McLame's whimpering defeat in 2008, and had a cable news station (FNC, aka the Fox Neocon Channel) in the tank for him, and has a super PAC to do his hatchet work for him.......and yet........he barely beat Rick Santorum by 8 votes. Yep, you read that right, 8 measly votes. (It should be noted, that until very recently, Rick Santorum's campaign was being ignored by everyone not named Mark Levin and had 68 cents and pocket lint to its name.) Even uglier for Mitt Commie was the fact that he was unable to drive a wooden stake into the heart of nemesis Newt Gingrich's campaign. Despite being carpet bombed by Romney's PAC operatives and Establishment hacks, Gingrich placed a respectable fourth and lived to fight another day. In other words---Mitt Commie choked.

Meanwhile, in Red Skull Ron Paul's Fourth Reich, the Paultards are tickled Code Pinko.(Either that, or they're stoned out of their minds yet again.) They think their Fuhrer has won a great victory over the "neocon bankster Zionist war mongers" by placing third. In actuality, this is a resounding, Stalingrad-like defeat for Herr Doktor. See, Iowa laws allow anyone to change their party affiliation at the door of any caucus and vote. So in theory, every liberaltarian, every Green, every 9/11 Truther, every Neo-Nazi, every malcontent, and every so-called "independent" in the state of Iowa could have showed up and dragged the Surrender Monkey's carcass across the finish line. But they didn't. Despite the "money bombs", the "spamming", the "trolling", making pests of themselves on talk radio shows, and other Brownshirt-like behavior, RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) and his flunkies have failed and failed big time. Third place in a contest whose rules favor you is a complete and utter joke, much like saying Herr Doktor is a Conservative.

Let me repeat: No, I'm not shilling for anyone (as of yet, I'm still undecided) and yes, I know Iowa's not that big of a deal. However, a win's a win and I'll take 'em any way I can get 'em. If you don't win, you can't keep it classy and say things like this:

HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: paulbotzot; romney; ronpaul; ronpaulbotzot; suckstobepaul; suckstoberomney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last
To: Absolutely Nobama

Didn’t Ron Paul beat Newt Gingrich? I remember seeing that last night.


51 posted on 01/04/2012 10:24:07 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaDumbBlonde

“That’ll do conservatism a bunch of good, won’t it?”

And playing nice with a socialist like Mitt Commie and a Jew hater like RuPaul will ? Did I miss a memo ?


52 posted on 01/04/2012 10:25:26 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Newt Gingrich ... way down there in FOURTH PLACE with 13 percent of the vote.


53 posted on 01/04/2012 10:27:54 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
I always look forward to reading intelligent, erudite commentary on Free Republic.

Sigh....

54 posted on 01/04/2012 10:28:04 AM PST by GSWarrior (Businessmen are more trustworthy than politicians, professors and preachers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
The military is the last people that ever want to fight a war. That's because they have to do the dirty work while the rest get to sit back and Monday Morning Quarterback.

There are many sources that admit Ron Paul gets the most from the active military. It's not just Ron Paul as you are claiming. Just Google it and you will see all sorts of news and media web sites confirming this claim. Why do you think no other candidate brings this inconvenient fact up?

Here is a short list for you,

CNN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5Aue2yZAOs

ABC News

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3601542&page=1

NY Times

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/22/soldiers-choice/

Another Site

http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/9044-ron-paul-campaign-receive-most-military-donations

There is over 135,000 hits on it just from Google about it.
You come up with your “conspiracies” that this is all a big lie. You need actual evidence that shows this. So far I have not seen or heard any evidence that disputes this.

55 posted on 01/04/2012 10:28:44 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Didn’t read a thing I wrote, did you ?


56 posted on 01/04/2012 10:29:35 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

These comments could be from a liberal-Democrat site. All name calling, zero substantive debate and hate mongering. No Thanks.


57 posted on 01/04/2012 10:30:03 AM PST by JudyM (JudyM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

See post 55


58 posted on 01/04/2012 10:30:22 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518; Absolutely Nobama
BTW, you do understand that the military supports Ron Paul more than any candidate?

This is a canard based on nothing but donations that supposedly came in from the military. One can easily see that most under payed service men do not donate cash to political campaigns. This hype from the whacked out Paulites has no way of being proved by any real percentages of service people.

As for Ron Paul supporters being Nazis, if a candidates receives donations and support from Stormfront, gets endorsed by David Duke, has close ties to racist anarchists like Murray Rothbard and Sam Rockwell, personally wrote racist newsletters, has an anti Israel policy tailor made for Code Pink it is easy to see why most rational people can come away thinking that the candidate is a racist with Brownshirt support. Does Paul fit into any of these categories I cited?

Paul has no business in the party of Reagan, of who he thoroughly denounced, and is no Conservative. He is a straight up Libertarian and should have the honesty and integrity to run under that banner. He, of course, has none of those qualities.


59 posted on 01/04/2012 10:31:28 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

It looks to me like a clear majority of Iowans - especially the under 45 crowd and Independent voters - thought Newt Gingrich was a warmongering kook who is “dangerous” to America.

http://www.westernyouth.org/articles/mitt-romney-wins-iowa-caucus/

“The CNN Iowa Exit Polls tell a fascinating tale: 99 percent of Republican voters are White, 15 percent are 17-29, and 16 percent are 30 to 44. Ron Paul won 48 percent of Millennial voters and 26 percent of Gen X voters. He won 37 percent of voters who make under $30,000 a year. Mitt Romney won 36 percent of voters who make over $100,000 a year.

33 percent of Ron Paul voters had never attended an Iowa Republican Presidential Caucus. Paul won 43 percent of Independent voters and 34 percent of Moderates. Rick Santorum won 35 percent of “Very Conservative” voters and 13 percent of Independents and 9 percent of Moderates.

Mitt Romney won 33 percent of voters who consider the “Economy” the most important issue. Ron Paul won 28 percent of voters who consider the federal budget deficit the most important issue. Rick Santorum won 58 percent of voters who consider abortion the most important issue.

Ron Paul won 37 percent of voters who considered him the “true conservative.” Mitt Romney won 48 percent of voters who believed he can beat Barack Obama. Rick Santorum won 40 percent of voters who believe he has “strong moral character.”

Rick Santorum won 32 percent of Evangelical Christians. Ron Paul and Mitt Romney won 18 percent and 14 percent of Evangelical Christians. Romney tied Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry with Evangelicals. OTOH, Mitt Romney and Ron Paul dominated the non-Evangelical vote, winning 38 percent and 26 percent respectively.

Conclusion: The Republican base of Evangelical Christians/Social Conservatives turned out for Rick Santorum who voted for him on the basis of his “strong moral character” and his opposition to abortion. Moderates and Independents voted for Ron Paul and Mitt Romney who cleaned house with Millennial voters.”


60 posted on 01/04/2012 10:32:18 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Gee CNN, ABC, and the New York Slimes......

Aren’t they going out of business ?


61 posted on 01/04/2012 10:32:41 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
“BTW, you do understand that the military supports Ron Paul more than any candidate?”
Not this military guy. Ron Paul is a dangerous man, with extreme and nutty ideas...He is the ultimate citation as to why the IA Caucasus are irrelevant.
62 posted on 01/04/2012 10:32:47 AM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

B-O-O-H-O-O.


63 posted on 01/04/2012 10:34:51 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

YEAH HAW! Hip hip huzzah!
Testify my brother!!!!!


64 posted on 01/04/2012 10:34:57 AM PST by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

YEAH HAW! Hip hip huzzah!
Testify my brother!!!!!


65 posted on 01/04/2012 10:35:30 AM PST by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Good rant. Are you hoping the trolls will show and we can have another bugzapper thread?


66 posted on 01/04/2012 10:36:19 AM PST by reaganaut (If Romney is a conservative then I'm the frickin Angel Moroni.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

all votes vor ron paul are throw away votes that only help obama.

I SERIOUSLY doubt the majority military support goes to kook paul.

Santorum was able to win because he was the last man standing. simple as that. The msm had gutted all the others. huntsman has no credibility as so is not even worth MSMing.

Kook paul is just that, a kook. He puts his own pork projects in bills and then votes against the bill in order to pretend to be a “virgin”. Last night speech was his swan song. His game is done and he knows it.


67 posted on 01/04/2012 10:37:48 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

We’ll see how Ron Paul does in real states like South Carolina and Florida lmao.

You closet Paultards are so transparent. Nearly as bad as Paul pretending to be a conservative.


68 posted on 01/04/2012 10:37:56 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Do you really think that will be repeated anywhere else outside the Nut House?


69 posted on 01/04/2012 10:38:18 AM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

If Ron Paul is a dangerous extremist, a kook with nutty ideas, then how did Ron Paul beat Newt Gingrich 22 to 13 in Iowa? Maybe Iowans thought starting another war with Iran was a nutty idea.

Team Santorum voters who think they are going to coast to victory on a “Bomb Iran” platform in 2012 need to take a closer look at the Iowa exit polls.


70 posted on 01/04/2012 10:38:35 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

OOORAH GUNNY!


71 posted on 01/04/2012 10:39:04 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

Of course! One of them is bound to mess up.......

Nothing brings us together like a ZOT!......


72 posted on 01/04/2012 10:41:05 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

Yes, and these all refer back to Ron Paul and the same information.
I said look up the current FEC contributions.
Again, why would any military support a guy who disparages them.
It’s ok if you want to support him, I do not care. What I do care about is a guy who doesn’t understand defense.


73 posted on 01/04/2012 10:41:47 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TheCause

Thanks, FRiend!


74 posted on 01/04/2012 10:43:32 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

How so?

(1) Rick Santorum won the “Very Conservative” vote, but he lost Independents and Moderates in droves to Ron Paul and Mitt Romney.

(2) The “kook” Ron Paul defeated Newt Gingrich handily in Iowa.

(3) Ron Paul won 50 percent of Millennial voters and 26 percent of Gen X voters. He won 18 percent of Evangelical Christians. More than Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry. He won the “True Conservative” vote in Iowa. He also won Independent and Moderate voters.

(4) Ron Paul is far closer to the center of the political spectrum than Rick Santorum.

(5) The Rick Santorum vote are pro-life, “Very Conservative,” White Evangelical Christians who are over the age of 45. He performs poorly outside that demographic.


75 posted on 01/04/2012 10:44:40 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

The rise of Ron Paul is extremely frustrating, for a lot of reasons. The biggest being here you have a man with white nationalist/neo-nazi ties, he goes to enemy nations on their media and agrees with them(Iran) and has made many incindiery and outright anti-Semitic or racist comments in the past. Yet through it all, enough normal people look past it because they agree with his fiscal policies. He also endorsed anti-American lunatic Cynthia McKinney for president.

Much of his support comes from young voters who are proving to be woefully ignorant or history or at the very least willing to tolerate evil for their own selfish ends. The sad thing is perhaps these voters don’t even think what he’s done is evil in the first place.

I call associating with neo-nazis/white nationalists evil. I call going to Iran and agreeing with every one of their positions evil. I call supporting anti-Semitic, anti-American Cynthia McKinney evil.

Are people so morally depraved they’re willing to tolerate this man? I’m not saying he’s Hitler, far from it, but I wonder if Germans back in the day said, ‘Well that Adolf says some awful things about the Jews, but he promises to make the trains run on time, so I’ll support him.’


76 posted on 01/04/2012 10:45:01 AM PST by bigdirty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

The funniest part of Paul’s, “nothing to be ashamed of concession speech, was watching Rand come up with inventive ways not to applaud the kooky parts of his Dad’s speech.

Best one: when Ru said Nato wasn’t needed, Rand coughed continually, until the applause line was gone...

lmao....can’t make this slit up.


77 posted on 01/04/2012 10:46:14 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

We will see how Rick Santorum performs in Virginia ... oh wait, not even Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich are on the ballot in the Old Dominion!

As for Florida, Ron Paul will do will there. He will do well in New Hampshire too.


78 posted on 01/04/2012 10:46:39 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

How do you figure Paul was handed a “staggering defeat” when he in fact got as many delegates as Romney and Santorum? You’d have to be somewhat intellectually challenged to give an “in your face” to what amounts to a de facto shared winner.

Also, Paul is the prefered choice for an overwhelming majority of our armed forces. Are you telling them “in your face” too? It’s possible to disagree on policy without resorting to calling those with whom you disagree retards. Unless you’re still wet behind the ears, that is.


79 posted on 01/04/2012 10:46:51 AM PST by Wyoming Cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Ron Paul > Newt Gingrich


80 posted on 01/04/2012 10:47:58 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Hahaha, I enjoyed.


81 posted on 01/04/2012 10:48:52 AM PST by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyoming Cowboy

“Also, Paul is the prefered choice for an overwhelming majority of our armed forces.”

Prove it? I see this alleged from time to time, but never backed up.


82 posted on 01/04/2012 10:50:28 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: bigdirty

Breaking News: There isn’t a big constituency out there for “bomb Iran” outside of the Evangelical Christian voting bloc. Most Americans are not tuning into the 700 Club to watch Pat Robertson.


83 posted on 01/04/2012 10:51:23 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Wyoming Cowboy

“Also, Paul is the prefered choice for an overwhelming majority of our armed forces.”

Does Screwy Lewy Rockwell pay you a nickel every time you mention this ? That nonsense has been debunked so many times it’s not even funny anymore.


84 posted on 01/04/2012 10:51:28 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

“As for Florida, Ron Paul will do will there. He will do well in New Hampshire too.”

He will lose Florida. H will lose New Hampshire.

He shot his wad in Iowa, it was his only chance for a win. He is a protest candidate who has no chance, unless he’s running for Texas State University VP.

He’s a joke to anybody with brains.


85 posted on 01/04/2012 10:53:51 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Umm, Ron Paul is a centrist compared to Rick Santorum and Pat Robertson.


86 posted on 01/04/2012 10:54:11 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518; Absolutely Nobama

87 posted on 01/04/2012 10:56:24 AM PST by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

“There isn’t a big constituency out there for “bomb Iran” outside of the Evangelical Christian voting bloc.”

lol, nice try...is that Pauline logic?

The lack of constituency belongs to Paul who thinks it is ok to allow Iran to attain a nuclear weapon.


88 posted on 01/04/2012 10:58:34 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Let’s see.

Ron Paul won Independents and Moderates in Iowa by significant margins. He won as many delegates as Rick Santorum in Iowa and defeated Newt Gingrich 22 to 13. He won 18 percent of Evangelicals in Iowa and the “True Conservative” vote according to CNN exit polls.

Ron Paul is going to lose New Hampshire and Florida? To who? to Rick Santorum? There are more Moderates and Independents in New Hampshire and Florida than Iowa.

Rick Santorum finished in second place in Iowa because he won the Jerry Falwell slice of the Republican electorate. He is not on the ballot in Virginia or other states.

Paul won 50 percent of Millennials in socially conservative Iowa and 26 percent of Gen Xers. Unlike Santorum, Ron Paul has the money and the demographic support to go much further into the 2012 race.


89 posted on 01/04/2012 11:00:06 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
So, let me get this straight:

Romney finishes 1st = failure
Paul finishes 3rd = failure
Gingrich finishes 4th = "respectable"

Yeah, it's pretty hard figuring out who your preferred candidate is.

All that said, the Iowa caucus means next to nothing & pretending like it does (like NYT, CNN, Fox, Wash Post, etc) will not make it so.

90 posted on 01/04/2012 11:00:22 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

No, it is a fact confirmed by exit polls. Independents and Moderates are the center of the electorate. Millennials and Gen X’ers are 30 percent of the Republican electorate now.

The people who support starting a war with Iran are THE MINORITY of Christian Zionists on the “Very Conservative” side of the Republican Party. They are the Jerry Falwell/Pat Robertson/Moral Majority crowd from the 1980s.

Compared to Ron Paul, these people are “extremists” on the Iran question. They call Ron Paul a “kook” for not wanting to start another unnecessary war with Iran, but the truth is that they are the ones who sound like “kooks” to the broader electorate.

Those people stuck with George W. Bush to the end when his approval rating had collapsed into the mid-20s.


91 posted on 01/04/2012 11:10:00 AM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
There are many sources that admit Ron Paul gets the most from the active military.

I was a bit skeptical about your claim, so I randomly clicked on your ABC News link, which oddly linked to a USA Today article.

The article claimed that Ron Paul was second to Obama in donations from military personnel, based exclusively on a total of $19,300 from 23 donations he garnered in 2005.

I am no longer skeptical. I know the claim is a bunch of hooey.

92 posted on 01/04/2012 11:12:56 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

I’m just happy to join the chorous. I was freakin’ bouncing off the walls watching Santorum leading the DNC/RNC pick Romney. And to see that crazy old whackjob in the one size fits all Kmart suit go third place was reassuring... but proof that some Iowans should NOT smoke crack before caucus day.


93 posted on 01/04/2012 11:16:39 AM PST by Made In The USA (This post may be recorded for quality purposes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

It is juvenile choice of words. You’re not mature enough to understand that, so you keep right on thinking you’re influential enough to write these vanities and sway somebody. All you accomplish is reflecting badly on the whole forum. Or, is that your mission?


94 posted on 01/04/2012 11:16:55 AM PST by JustaDumbBlonde (Don't wish doom on your enemies. Plan it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JudyM
These comments could be from a liberal-Democrat site. All name calling, zero substantive debate and hate mongering. No Thanks.

100% agreed. Posts like these help no Republican candidates, but do give aid and assistance to Obama 2012. Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment should be posted in bold text at the top of every page here until the next election.

95 posted on 01/04/2012 11:20:02 AM PST by Tarantulas ( Illegal immigration - the trojan horse that's treated like a sacred cow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Good rant ... I have tweeted Reince Priebus and suggested rather strongly that the Antiestablishmentarian be dropped from any GOP support because he is NOT a Conservative and it just pulls the GOP down having him in the vicinity.

Mitt Romney has attempted to buy the GOP Nomination for a long time and is STILL not within shouting distance. Will he ever realize that voters just don’t warm to his “Ken-like” appearance and his ObamaCare-Light personality? And he’s allowed voters to suggest a Marco Rubio VP ... doesn’t he KNOW the Constitution at all? Rubio is NOT a Natural Born Citizen and is ineligible to be Vice President! Is Mitt toying with the voters or just ‘that’ dumb? OR is he afraid to say anything because he knows if he does, it opens up the “birther” questions?

Newt Gingrich is a vengeful opportunist. He’s still angry at Congress for kicking him out of the House and he will do ANYTHING it takes to get into a position of thumb-nosing power. He’s a womanizer. He converted to Catholicism and is doing his ‘thing’ by using the Faith to promote himself in his efforts to reach his goal. Trust this former Georgia resident that when he loses the GOP Candidacy AGAIN, he’ll show his chameleon ways and turn into someone else. He’s now trying to attach himself to Rick Santorum’s coat-tails and if Santorum has ANY sense, he’ll pass ... No one needs the chains and concrete sinking weight of what is in Newt’s closet.

Ron Paul is an antiestablishmentarian. The GOP is and has been foolish to give him a platform. His supporters couldn’t raise nearly the money he’s gotten in FREE advertisement for his antiestablishment so-called libertarian views. He’s no longer the ‘comedic relief’ of the ‘staid uptight’ GOP ... he’s dangerous because his supporters aren’t ‘just’ antiestablishment, they are also anarchists.

Rick Santorum is far far from ‘perfect’ ... but then there never has been a perfect Candidate ... what he is, though, is head and shoulders better than the likes of Romney and Gingrich and Ron Paul. Most of his faults are in the past and he’s not a womanizer ... and needs to stay away from womanizers. He is going to be called many things by other Republicans who want to bring him down to their level. He needs to be very very very careful of who he allows to ‘advise’ him because that could be his undoing and give the liberal media fodder. Alan Colmes’ hateful comment will keep some of the media at bay for a while, maybe all the way til November.

Rick Perry is George Bush Light mixed with Obama Open Borders Light ... He couldn’t win the heart and soul of American Conservatives. He’s wasting money but helping Texans by continuing to run. Any time away from screwing up Texas is good for Texas.

Jon Huntsman ... can’t win anyway is is just spending money to spend money, it appears.

Now we come to the heart and soul of Conservative TEA Party politics ... Michele Bachmann ... What a pity that people don’t mean what they say, that people don’t actually STUDY the Constitution the way they study the gossip magazines and watch ‘reality’ TV and listen to liberal news media. What a pity that people don’t even know what Taxed Enough Already means for them. What a pity that people prefer the status quo to risking returning to Founding Fathers’ standards of government. What a pity that people are GENDER BIASED ... how many times has the phrase “shrill” been used by print media and pundits and in online comments when describing Michele Bachmann? And instead of LISTENING to her words ... that’s all people remember ... she’s ‘shrill.’ Yeah, she’s as shrill as YOUR MAMA! I wish and hope that Michele Bachmann becomes Speaker of the House ... as she should already be.

Romney may have ‘won’ by a few votes, but he spent a lot of money for those few votes ... and proved once again that money CANNOT buy enough votes to get one into the White House. [Not without thuggery and George Soros and Media promotion.]

Ron Paul coming in third means that ‘libertarians’ cannot be told to Occupy Caucuses by Democrats out to prove their power in Iowa.

The saddest part of all is that Michele Bachmann should have come in Third ... and gender bias is still strong in Iowa and across the USofA ... “We’re not ‘ready’ for a woman President.” If I hear that one more time, I’ll scream.


96 posted on 01/04/2012 11:23:37 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (I am Roman Catholic, US Citizen, Patriot, TEA Party Alumni, Oath Keeper, Voter, Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

“Umm, Ron Paul is a centrist compared to Rick Santorum and Pat Robertson.”

Your confused perspective fails to realize that we want real conservatives...not liberal charlatans confusing those lacking intelligence.


97 posted on 01/04/2012 11:24:15 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
The second best anti-Paul rant I have read on FR. Only JimRob has done better.

“Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!” — Jim Robinson, 09/30/07
98 posted on 01/04/2012 11:26:48 AM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

“100% agreed. Posts like these help no Republican candidates, but do give aid and assistance to Obama 2012. Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment should be posted in bold text at the top of every page here until the next election.”

Maybe you can go over to the Paul Forums and paste that over there, since he teamed with Romney to attack other conservative Republicans.

Paul is the pure RINO...a libertarian on some issues with a Mondale foreign policy....apologies to Mondale, who is to the right of Paul.


99 posted on 01/04/2012 11:33:51 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
Your rant is a breath of fresh air. Like you I am tired of the Paultards trying to hijack FR with post after post. We all know they are a small minority, but they are a determined bunch.
100 posted on 01/04/2012 11:53:54 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson