Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!
My utter disdain for Mitt Commie and RuPaul | 01/05/12 | Alan Levy

Posted on 01/04/2012 9:28:40 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last
To: Absolutely Nobama

Using Both Brain Cells Simultaneously

Your post belies your user name - if you continue to alienate the Romney and Paul supporters you can guarantee an Obama second term.
101 posted on 01/04/2012 12:07:36 PM PST by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: One_who_hopes_to_know

I don’t see how a good 1/3 to 1/2 of Paul supporters will either not vote or vote for Obama if Paul isn’t the nominee. The Code Pink crowd and the ‘Herb’ smokers for sure will.


102 posted on 01/04/2012 12:53:20 PM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

I’m going to help Rick Santorum and Rick Perry.


103 posted on 01/04/2012 12:58:18 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

This thread is such a bad idea.

This race is going to be close. We are going to need every single vote and cannot afford to alienate anyone who opposes Obama for any reason. We have to be united going into the general and you are pushing some away. Should Paul decide to run as an independent, he can take 3-5 percent of the vote and keep Obama right where he is.

Not smart.


104 posted on 01/04/2012 1:00:44 PM PST by elvis-lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Confused perspective?

Who is more mainstream on Iran? Is it Ron Paul who opposes wasteful, expensive foreign wars, or is it Rick Santorum and his 700 Club followers who want to precipitate Armageddon in the Middle East?

Ron Paul is a centrist on foreign wars. He is supported by Independent and Moderate voters on that issue. Rick Santorum has no support on Iran outside of the Jerry Falwell constituency who were the 22 percent of Americans still backing W. in 2008.


105 posted on 01/04/2012 1:13:53 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama; One_who_hopes_to_know
if you continue to alienate the Romney and Paul supporters you can guarantee an Obama second term.

You're the most powerful man in the country, apparently.

106 posted on 01/04/2012 1:14:38 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Only to a Paultard!


107 posted on 01/04/2012 1:22:03 PM PST by Clara Lou (nObama, noRomney, noPaul, noBachmann . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: elvis-lives

Look, this sentiment of “Don’t make them mad at us, or they will run independent and guarantee an Obama win” is just plain appeasement folks.

I’ve heard this same garbage way back during the Dole Campaign.

It’s primary season - NOW is the time to fight, and fight HARD for a TRUE Conservative, not some anti-Semitic conspiracy crackpot and Ruling Class Crony being foisted on us.

How does one apply the 11th Reagan Commandment when you have candidates running who ARE NOT TRUE REPUBLICANS??? Are we going to deliberately submit our Conservatism to defeat over fears that the crackpot might run third party or we might not get scraps front eh Ruling Class Table if Mittens wins?

Look, Ron Paul will probably run third party when he loses the GOP nomination. His mob-zombie cultists are already urging that course of action on their boards. Ron Paul IS NO Republican and he is NO Conservative. He runs on our ticket because that is the only way a libertarian can win elections.

As for Mittens, did we learn nothing from 2008? If you are going to run a Ruling Class liberal against a Marxist, the greater Big Government Leftist is going to win it hands down. That’s why the media and the regime are busy trying to convince America that Obama fears a Romney nomination, when the opposite is true. In a bid between two Statists - the greater Statist is going to win.

Them is just facts folks.

Screw appeasement. Screw compromise. Fight dammit!

We either fight now for SOMEONE who has a shred of Conservatism and consistency to our cause - or we surrender to those who honestly want Conservatives silenced, marginalized and rendered irrelevant. That is what Paulistinians will do, that’s what Mitten’s crew will do.

Sheesh, why even have a primary if we’re supposed to lie in fear of ‘offending’ other candidates’ followers? If I had to guess, a chunk of Paulistas would vote for Obama anyway if their vaunted political savior is not on the ticket, and it’s possible a lot of Mitten’s supporters might too.

It’s primary season, full throttle, engines ahead full, fight for a Conservative and damn the consequences. We can worry about patching things up after the convention.


109 posted on 01/04/2012 1:25:05 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

Keep telling yourself that.

We saw what happened in 2006 and 2008 when W. was the candidate of the Iraq War. Obama won in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home.

If you make the 2012 election about starting a war with Iran instead of defeating Obama, Obama will regain his support among Independent and Millennial voters.

The so-called “Paultards” are at the center of the electorate on starting a war with Iran. The warmongers are on the fringe on that issue.


110 posted on 01/04/2012 1:28:09 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Chill my friend. All last night did was show how the process is broken...Paul IS a nut and isnt taken seriously by anyone except perhaps Iowans and his cult-like followers.


111 posted on 01/04/2012 1:34:41 PM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

Do you realize this is the year 2012?

Do you realize how much the demographics of this country have changed since the Bob Dole campaign when Gen X’ers were in high school? Millennial and Gen X voters are a much larger share of the electorate: 30 percent of voters in Iowa. There are more Independent voters. There are far more minorities.

Look at it this way: Pat Robertson and his Christian Zionist followers changed the Republican Party in the 1980s. That was 23 years ago. America is a different place now.

Once again, the people who calling Ron Paul a “kook” and a “crackpot” because of his opposition to starting an expensive, unnecessary war with Iran for theological reasons - those people are the minority, those people are nowhere near the center of the electorate, the country outside the Jerry Falwell/700 Club milieu is EXHAUSTED with endless foreign wars.

Apparently, the message hasn’t been sent: Newt Gingrich lost Evangelicals to Ron Paul in the Iowa caucus. He was actually destroyed by Ron Paul and Mitt Romney in the Iowa causes. That happened in one of the most Evangelical states in America.

I’m telling you it happened because of the endless war/endless debt issue. Just look at W’s spectacular collapse into the 20s between 2006 and 2008.

The people who were diehard supporters of Bush in 2008 at the height of his unpopularity are an even smaller share of the electorate in 2012. There is no path to victory in a general election for a Republican candidate who wants to start another war with Iran.


112 posted on 01/04/2012 1:38:24 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston; Admin Moderator
"which would be an even more monumental (expletive deleted) that would cost infinitely more money."

Your paucity of thought is apparent in its vulgar expression.

And just what the heck is a "Millennial voter?"
113 posted on 01/04/2012 1:38:41 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: INVAR

“It’s primary season, full throttle, engines ahead full, fight for a Conservative and damn the consequences. We can worry about patching things up after the convention.”
___________

Eveyone agrees that we have to nominate a conservative but you are treating potential votes as though they are an enemy. That is music to Obama’s ears. You are helping him keep the factions at each other’s throats.

Well. There is always the House and Senate.


114 posted on 01/04/2012 1:45:31 PM PST by elvis-lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston; Absolutely Nobama; Old Sarge
"Once again, the people who calling Ron Paul a “kook” and a “crackpot” because of his opposition to starting an expensive, unnecessary war with Iran for theological reasons..."

The only "theological" reasons for starting a war are those inherent in the "reasoning" of Armanidinnerjacket and his mullahs.

The reasons for stopping a crazed madman armed with nuclear weapons need not have their roots in any theology of ours. Survival instinct will do just fine.
115 posted on 01/04/2012 1:45:39 PM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

No, the Iowa Caucus shows that Ron Paul has surged from 9.5 percent to 21.5 percent in Iowa, which is one of the most Evangelical states in America.

He did that by winning 50 percent of voters under 29 and 26 percent of voters 30 to 44 who are now 30 percent of the Iowa electorate. Ron Paul also won 18 percent of “Evangelical vote” who were almost certainly under the age of 44.

Ron Paul beat Newt Gingrich in Iowa 21 to 13. He beat Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann too. That’s because Paul won every demographic under the age of 40 by wide margins.

Rick Santorum won among White Evangelicals over the age of 45 who are declining percentage of the Republican electorate. He won over 50 percent of people who say that abortion is their most important issue.

The process is not “broken” ... the results only reflect changing demographics and the massive unpopularity of starting a war with Iran and a surging national debt with voters under the age of 40.


116 posted on 01/04/2012 1:46:40 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

A “Millennial” voter is a voter who was born after 1981. “Gen X’ers” are voters who were born between 1965 and 1981.

There is that thing called “aging”: it is inevitable that older voters comprise a shrinking percentage of the electorate, and younger voters a growing percentage of the electorate.

Ron Paul won 50 percent of voters 17 to 24, 45 percent of voters 25 to 29, and 34 percent of voters 30 to 39. Rick Santorum won 25 percent of voters 40 to 49 and 27 percent of voters 50 to 64. Mitt Romney won 33 percent of voters 65 and older.


117 posted on 01/04/2012 1:51:14 PM PST by WilliamHouston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston
We saw what happened in 2006 and 2008 when W. was the candidate of the Iraq War. Obama won in 2008 because he promised to bring the troops home.

Excuse you, I know that this is the only available anti-war forum talking points you have for reference, but the Democrat wins in 06 and 08 HAD NOTHING to do with the Code Pinko Agenda of "Bring the troops home" (I know you Paultards repeat this stuff over and over to try and convince yourselves) - it had everything to do with Conservatives being pissed off and discontent with the party for compromising with the Democrats on FISCAL matters.

By and large many Conservatives sat those elections out, and those who reluctantly supported the RINO candidate in 08, did so for Palin and it was too late to salvage the Establishment Candidate against the Chicago machine who did as you are requesting of us now: to keep on the kid gloves and say nothing bad about those whom are NOT Conservatives.

We tried it your way already, by being nice to those who are our ideological enemies. It does't work. It never works. We fight for what we believe, or die trying. Playing along to get along ensures more of the same. It's Primary season, why should we give a rat's arse about offending Paultards and Mittens supporters when (as you have demonstrated yourself) have no problem bashing Evangelicals and Conservatives?

If you make the 2012 election about starting a war with Iran instead of defeating Obama, Obama will regain his support among Independent and Millennial voters.

I can appreciate the fact you Ron Paul worshippers willfully ignore the FACT that Iran's regime has BEEN AT WAR WITH US SINCE 1979. It's however, beyond reprehensible for you people to tar anyone noting the danger a nuclear-armed Iran is, as 'warmongering' or 'starting a war' with Iran. War is upon us, whether you want it or not. If want to keep appeasing Jihadists - then do so while risking your own neck and not risking genocide for the rest of us.

The so-called “Paultards” are at the center of the electorate on starting a war with Iran. The warmongers are on the fringe on that issue.

It's beyond ludicrous to assert that the mainstream of America wants to appease and surrender to avowed enemies by turning tail and running away home so the Iranian regime can finish making nukes so they can usher in their 12th Imam and instigate world conquest.

Look, I know the Paultards are committed Pacifists and Isolationists - but I refuse to get along with idiots willing for us to commit nation suicide, thinking themselves more moral, while clueless about this hostile world we live in.

It's just another example of why Paulistinians and RINO's do not belong in a Conservative party.

118 posted on 01/04/2012 2:02:13 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston
Oh great, I get to refute freshman-level poly-sci idiocy.

Do you realize how much the demographics of this country have changed since the Bob Dole campaign when Gen X’ers were in high school? Millennial and Gen X voters are a much larger share of the electorate: 30 percent of voters in Iowa. There are more Independent voters. There are far more minorities.

Wow. I heard the same thing, almost verbatim from an Obama drone in '08.

It really is uncanny how much alike the Paulistinians and the Obama drones sound. Do you folks share the same talking points bible?

Look at it this way: Pat Robertson and his Christian Zionist followers changed the Republican Party in the 1980s. That was 23 years ago. America is a different place now.

Yes, yes. We know. The "old" America is a thing of the past. The 'era of Reagan' is over and such stuff. We have even heard from the Obama Drones this same thing in regards to the fact that there is nothing wrong with Socialism either, and we should embrace it if we want to win any future elections.

Pretty sure my reply to such nonsense is: "Nuts".

Oh, and curious regarding this continuous bilge of reference to "Christian Zionists". I'm assuming this is what you Paulistas who read Stormfront and Personals from David Duke are pulling from as the reference, yes?

Once again, the people who calling Ron Paul a “kook” and a “crackpot” because of his opposition to starting an expensive, unnecessary war with Iran for theological reasons - those people are the minority, those people are nowhere near the center of the electorate, the country outside the Jerry Falwell/700 Club milieu is EXHAUSTED with endless foreign wars.

As always, the Ru Paul talking points are exactly that same as those found at Code Pink and other Anarchist/Pacifist Obama-supporting sites and pages.

Since Christian Conservatives (or Zionists as you referenced) are an obvious enemy to your ideological viewpoints, and to be blamed for losses to your candidate and the Ruling Class Establishment Candidate, why do you care on a Conservative forum if we distance and disparage your chosen political saviors and candidates? Why warn us against angering what you erroneously assert is the 'great center" if we are all just 'fringe warmongers'??

Apparently, the message hasn’t been sent: Newt Gingrich lost Evangelicals to Ron Paul in the Iowa caucus.

Wow, that wouldn't be because of Newt's known philandering and multiple marriages now would it? No! It's because Evangelicals (aka: Christian Zionists) know Ron Paul is near-divine and the only true Christian and Savior of liberty in this race./sarc.

I’m telling you it happened because of the endless war/endless debt issue. Just look at W’s spectacular collapse into the 20s between 2006 and 2008.

Right. And the media had nothing to do with that, nor the disgust Conservatives had for the runaway domestic spending. No - according to you Paulistinians, it was our 'endless wars' that create our debt - not the endless welfare spending.

Look, we're not listening to you Code Pink, Stormfront Paulistinians. You sound no different than the drones who pined for Obama.

There is no path to victory in a general election for a Republican candidate who wants to start another war with Iran.

I think NerObama will get us there sooner (he may have no choice, enemies always tend to strike weakness). But in regards to your statement - methinks it reminds of something Neville Chamberlain may have told Winston Churchill at one time in the late 1930's.

119 posted on 01/04/2012 2:43:14 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston
There is that thing called “aging”: it is inevitable that older voters comprise a shrinking percentage of the electorate, and younger voters a growing percentage of the electorate.

Yeah, sure. The Boomers have all died off.

Oops, they haven't.

Any other moronic observations you wish to add to this thread?

120 posted on 01/04/2012 3:24:56 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Ron Paul is no better presidential material than Obama. He won’t be the nominee anyway. Deal with it.


121 posted on 01/04/2012 3:30:21 PM PST by Clara Lou (nObama, noRomney, noPaul, noBachmann, noSantorum . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston
33 percent of Ron Paul voters had never attended an Iowa Republican Presidential Caucus. Paul won 43 percent of Independent voters and 34 percent of Moderates.

Your stupidity is on display again. The Iowa Caucus open voting rules and the Ron Paul campaign created a self-selecting process for thousands of young non-Republican voters to come into the Caucuses and skew the numbers in the younger voter range. It's apparent to anyone but a dumbassed Paultard pimp who wants to make a larger point where none logically can be made.

122 posted on 01/04/2012 3:32:08 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dead; Absolutely Nobama
if you continue to alienate the Romney and Paul supporters you can guarantee an Obama second term.

You're the most powerful man in the country, apparently.


ROFL! Hey, Alan. You've been holding out on us. Most powerful kingmaker in the country, huh?   Dude!   Kewl.
123 posted on 01/04/2012 4:04:47 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

“Who is more mainstream on Iran?”

Anybody but Ron Paul.

His inability to discern enemies and his ignorance of the history of despotic regimes is astounding. He is an embarrassment to Republicans.

“Rick Santorum has no support on Iran outside of the Jerry Falwell constituency who were the 22 percent of Americans still backing W. in 2008.”

Can you show evidence that Americans support Ron Paul’s absurd policy of allowing Iran to attain a nuclear weapon?

NO.


124 posted on 01/04/2012 4:05:15 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

The VA GOP changed the eligibility rules ONE MONTH before the deadline. Gee, I wonder who convinced them to do that? Funny how Mitt and Crazy Uncle Paul are the only ones that remained on the ballot.

The courts will and should overturn what the VA GOP did.


125 posted on 01/04/2012 4:18:26 PM PST by Fledermaus (A snow ball in hell has a better chance of surviving than Ron Paulyp in the primaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

Ron Paul’s supporters were Howard Dean freaks in 2004. How did that work out for him?


126 posted on 01/04/2012 4:21:28 PM PST by Fledermaus (A snow ball in hell has a better chance of surviving than Ron Paulyp in the primaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: elvis-lives

If past elections are any indication, this thread is nothing compared to the ones you’ll see if RP runs 3rd party, and Obama wins by fewer votes than RP got. Every one of them will be counted as votes that should have gone to the Republican candidate, and people will want blood for it.


127 posted on 01/04/2012 4:22:27 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Wyoming Cowboy

The Iowa caucases don’t choose convention delegates.


128 posted on 01/04/2012 4:22:34 PM PST by Fledermaus (A snow ball in hell has a better chance of surviving than Ron Paulyp in the primaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: One_who_hopes_to_know

Right...if Absolutely Nobama posts a thread saying he thinks Ron Paul is a kook everyone will take their balls and go home.

Wow. I can see it now. Standing in the polling place wondering whom to vote for president and pulling the lever for Obama because a FReeper made you mad.

If that’s the level of intelligence in Rommney and Paul supporters then we are already doomed.


129 posted on 01/04/2012 4:26:58 PM PST by Fledermaus (A snow ball in hell has a better chance of surviving than Ron Paulyp in the primaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
No, I'm not shilling for anyone

And yet you're calling everyone DORKS? Son, you ain't been around long enough to be calling anyone dorks..........

In fact, you seem to be one of the new breed of newbies here who never grew up when civility was the norm and are taking this site down the drain........

Ever give a thought why the FReepathons are taking longer and longer to meet the goals? Of course not, you were never here when the fundraisers were fulfilled within several weeks.

It's because of the disrespectful newcomers such as you who are causing the long term residents to throw up their hands in disgust and move on to other locations.......

130 posted on 01/04/2012 4:36:16 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Naugahyde is no longer available due to the Naugas being hunted to extinction.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Newt had just 8K. Perry, with over 11K should have qualified. Rick probably didn’t even submit. If crazy paul was able to do it, they should have as well. Especially if they were serious. We always tend to blame others. I’m sure if it was reversed everyone would be siding with VA GOP. No matter what, it’s embarrassing.


131 posted on 01/04/2012 4:41:22 PM PST by VicVega ( GEAUX LSU TIGERS, GEAUX SAINTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Wow. I can see it now. Standing in the polling place wondering whom to vote for president and pulling the lever for Obama because a FReeper made you mad.

If that’s the level of intelligence in Rommney and Paul supporters then we are already doomed.

While no reflection on FReepers, I know of SEVERAL ardent Paul supporters who voted for Obama in 2008 - citing their anti-war positions as their single-issue.

And they said they will do so again if Paul is not the nominee and not on the ticket in November. Their Blame America First Pacifist religious beliefs trump the lip service they pay to Conservatism

So yes, I think there are some Paul and Romney people who WILL vote for Obama in the General election.

132 posted on 01/04/2012 4:44:58 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
And yet you're calling everyone DORKS?

Maybe it's just blowback from being constantly called a 'neocon', 'Zionist', 'warmonger' and other sundry things from the Paulistas when stating opposition to their political savior.

133 posted on 01/04/2012 4:53:37 PM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: elvis-lives; Kartographer
You guys are right. Lets consider McCain for a second. Lots of people were going to stay home but decided to vote when he picked Palin. We know it wasn't enough.

Have to remind optimistic that we can unit to get rid of the current traitor in charge.

134 posted on 01/04/2012 4:54:39 PM PST by VicVega ( GEAUX LSU TIGERS, GEAUX SAINTS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: INVAR
Maybe it's just blowback

The poster wasn't just addressing Paul supporters.........

135 posted on 01/04/2012 5:06:47 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (Naugahyde is no longer available due to the Naugas being hunted to extinction.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: WilliamHouston

The same “Evangelicals” and independents that voted for BHO four years ago? Iowa matters not! Lets see how NH and SC go for the fruit bar....and for you, and those like you. You and those like you have only clouded the water. Things are about to clear up. What is your fixation with Iran? Nobody is going to war with Iran! We have in fact been at war with them since the 1970’s...they have been killing our servicemen in Afghanistan for many years now, killings which have largely gone unanswered. Perhaps their day is coming. I don’t see it, but perhaps.


136 posted on 01/04/2012 7:22:29 PM PST by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

“Racist, anti-Semitic, terrorist apologists have no business being president of the US.”

Roger that!


137 posted on 01/04/2012 7:33:35 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Baseballguy

No, this is my Eli Manning moment. David Tyree just caught a pass on his helmet.


138 posted on 01/04/2012 7:37:35 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DManA

“Much more fun getting in each other’s faces than defeating Obama and saving the Republic.”

And of course, the Paultards and Mittbots would never, ever attack anyone. Of course not. Just a bunch of misunderstood souls, right ? /sarc

So basically what you’re saying is we should just lie down and let either Mitt Commie or Jew hater Ron Paul run away with the nomination ? Thanks, but no thanks. I’d rather live in America if it’s all the same.


139 posted on 01/04/2012 7:43:11 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dainbramaged

Outstanding! If you want, I’ll ping you when I write something else.


140 posted on 01/04/2012 7:45:57 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“As for Ron Paul supporters being Nazis, if a candidates receives donations and support from Stormfront, gets endorsed by David Duke, has close ties to racist anarchists like Murray Rothbard and Sam Rockwell, personally wrote racist newsletters, has an anti Israel policy tailor made for Code Pink it is easy to see why most rational people can come away thinking that the candidate is a racist with Brownshirt support. Does Paul fit into any of these categories I cited?”

The Magic 8 Ball says.....Yep!


141 posted on 01/04/2012 7:50:14 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bigdirty

“I call associating with neo-nazis/white nationalists evil. I call going to Iran and agreeing with every one of their positions evil. I call supporting anti-Semitic, anti-American Cynthia McKinney evil.”

I’m with you and so is the majority of America!


142 posted on 01/04/2012 7:55:52 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Rand is nothing like his whack job dad, that’s for sure.


143 posted on 01/04/2012 7:59:31 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Target rich environment!

LOL! Cool pic!


144 posted on 01/04/2012 8:01:50 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Target rich environment!

LOL! Cool pic!


145 posted on 01/04/2012 8:02:11 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Here, I’ll be your pimp.

I like your in the face thing.
I wish our side would do it more.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/alanlevy


146 posted on 01/04/2012 8:06:15 PM PST by right way right (What's it gonna take?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani

Didn’t read a thing I wrote, did you ?


147 posted on 01/04/2012 8:06:36 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

“He’s no longer the ‘comedic relief’ of the ‘staid uptight’ GOP ... he’s dangerous because his supporters aren’t ‘just’ antiestablishment, they are also anarchists.”

Rock on FRiend, rock on!


148 posted on 01/04/2012 8:10:48 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: dead

“I am no longer skeptical. I know the claim is a bunch of hooey.”

Not only do you have the best handle on FR but you’re 10000% correct!


149 posted on 01/04/2012 8:14:25 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Wow! Thank you!

And you’re right, there is no one better than the Boss when blasting the Paultards. Jim Robinson is an artist, whereas I’m a guy doodling on a napkin at Denny’s. Jim is a very, very talented writer.


150 posted on 01/04/2012 8:22:30 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson