Skip to comments.The Top 5 Reasons Obama Must Be Removed as Commander-in-Chief
Posted on 01/08/2012 11:54:54 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Obama recently signed a mysterious new law that proclaims all American soil is a "battleground," thereby allowing the president to indefinitely detain any American citizen without charges. Critics fear Obama will use his fun new unconstitutional powers to make his political enemies disappear, but that may not be necessary.
The way things are going, most patriotic Americans will soon be six feet under, felled by apoplectic strokes brought on by reading the latest outrage committed by our "Commander in Chief." He may not have a limit to what he'll inflict; but our collective blood pressure may have a limit to what we can bear.
With each passing hour, the question becomes not if America can survive a second term, but whether we can survive another day. It's not just the $15 trillion in debt, the Muslim Brotherhood in the catbird seat, and our bleeding open border. It's the never-ending deliberate assaults against our safety and security laughingly committed by the cold-eyed man with the nuclear code.
Here are the top 5 reasons Obama must be removed as Commander-in-Chief. Please read them while seated.
ONE - LightSquared: If we had an actual media, you should be able to wake up an average fourth grader at 3 AM and ask, "Who's General William Shelton?" and the fourth grader would chirpily recite: "He's the Air Force Commander who was pressured by the White House to change his testimony about LightSquared."
The facts are not in dispute....
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
My #1: “I’ll take post turtles for $15 Trillion, Alex.”
Didn’t even mention that he is not eligible to hold office.
Or that he has increased the national debt exponentially.
Or that he shoved Obamacare down our throats.
“Obama recently signed a mysterious new law that proclaims all American soil is a “battleground,” thereby allowing the president to indefinitely detain any American citizen without charges. Critics fear Obama will use his fun new unconstitutional powers to make his political enemies disappear, but that may not be necessary.”
How can the new law be mysterious when 43 Republican senators voted for the the law that Obama will use to make his political enemies disappear?
The only logical conclusion would be that Obama and the 43 Republican senators who voted for this new law are not political enemies, but rather conspirators against the American people.
Thus, the Republican senators who voted for the new law are no better than Obama.
Some times you wonder if they are on the same team. I believe they are.
NDAA may have given us the right to go "detain" them all.
President Obama doesn't deserve all the blame for points 2 and 3. Don't forget he was aided by Congress, to include some Republicans. We seem to focus on the presidency for some reason, but Congress controls both spending and the laws.
I don't like what the administration is doing but laws give a president quite a bit of leeway. Who wrote those laws? Congress and the special interests that control Congress.
I emphasize this in the hope that people take out their frustrations on ALL of the people who were complicit in creating the current mess. Don't forget that things like the repeal of DADT were passed by Democrats AND Republicans.
Many (most?) senators and representatives deserve to be booted, and if I had my way, I'd take their pensions, too!
Weak with our enemies, he not only heeds the wishes of Iranian dictator Ahmadinejad,
but gave him and the mullahs top-secret stealth drone technology.
Useless with the economy, this clueless twit flits with his wookie-beast, perpetually angry wife from flamboyant vacation to vacation while promising to work hard to create jobs...
Worst of all, he is focusing on domestic enemies and will use dictatorial powers to kill them if they disagree or criticize him... all in the name of fighting domestic 'terrorism'.
This asshat must go!
Amen to that brother.
Those 43 Republicans need to ridden out of Washington on a rail.
Again: We do ot have two parties. We have one party with RINO offshoots.
I was also too many Republicans in the House that voted for it. One of them was Allen West.
Let me go throught this story one by one.
1.An Air Force General that was pressured bythe White House to change his objections to a National Securiity problem.
Is this guy still a General? If he is he should be removed.
He should shamefully remove himself.
2.Fast & Furious should be an impeachable offense.
4.The Libyan war he started with his Arab spring.
He also destroyed Egypt.
5.The things mentioned are bad enough but he also turned the nations defense over to queers.
Only 5? Count again.
Now who would have ever thought that an un-Constitutional president would set out on a path of destroying what’s left of our Constitution?
The democrat party must be so very proud.
“The only logical conclusion would be that Obama and the 43 Republican senators who voted for this new law are not political enemies, but rather conspirators against the American people. “
EXACTLY so !!
If America is the battleground, then all who oppose the current regieme are combatants, whether they want to be , or not ..
America is up “For sale”,... and ‘Martial Law’ is the “Law of the Land” ,envitable , and only a matter of time...
Time to fill up the FEMA camps for re-education .
5.”The things mentioned are bad enough but he also turned the nations defense over to queers”.
This is something people need to be looking out for. Most people think that the American Military would never turn on the citizens. Maybe the moral military we have always known would not. But the new military being set up with no moral or ethical code will be totally different in nature.
If you pay attention, Hizzoner Hussein and wife have been spending a lot of time courting the military vote. For good reason, he is remaking them into his tools.
Obama even makes Nixon look good.At least he didn’t steal money.
the General reported to congress the pressure applied - he was pressured but he didn’t buckle as I understand it.
Germany had the Treaty of Versailles to anger them. This President is causing the problems. Mark my words, it will not turn out the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.