Skip to comments.JUDGE ORDERS OBAMA to APPEAR to Testify
Posted on 01/20/2012 10:57:39 AM PST by GregNH
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Thank you Sidebar Mod.
That is QUITE the shopping list! I am popping up some corn here and settling in to wait!
He gives up Georgia. He wouldn’t have wan there anyway. Could he give up Florida??? heh-heh.
I thought there was a default judgment against him in the last election; nothing happened then.
Fox News, fair and balanced?
Nope, muzzled and SILENT!
Google search: Obama Malihi just 39,900 hits.
Tick, Tick, Tick should be fun when it breaks big!
I thought there was a default judgment against him in the last election; nothing happened then.
Succinct. Same thing I was trying to say, but better and briefer.
Agree on both counts.
I think you have pointed out elsewhere that there is a genuine "chain of custody" issue unless the judge receives the BC directly from HI. It is inconceivable that opposing counsel would not have access to the exhibit for nondestructive examination (particularly since damages from an inadvertent loss is limited to <$50), but I am not familiar with GA's procedure codes applicable at the administrative level.
If they are not given access, they may plan to immediately go to state court. Their argument includes the fact he has spent enormous sums to avoid production, there is no record of birth in a HI hospital, he has never produced to any state for the purpose of establishing eligibility, and everything he has voluntarily produced to date has been patently defective; that this production not coming from the issuer, is simply a continuation of that agenda.
mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama?
NO! MMM MMM MMM, Michael M. Malihi!
Too funny! How sweet it is!
If Ø doesn’t comply 100% with this subpena and is kicked off Georgia’s ballot and other states ballots as a result of his non-compliance, what eventually will happen to Nancy Pelosi? After all, she signed off on this fraud. She approved he was Constitutionaly eligible to run for POTUS. She should be made to face the man and be tried for aiding and abetting massive election fraud. Then go after all those that were complicate. I do hope and pray things go our way for once in this saga. That’s a long list of things and he better not forget to bring EVERYTHING with him. Otherwise, he knows the result of his failure to do so.
all he had to do was to SHOW THE DAMN THING but maybe when one does not have it then it is hard to show.
The MSM can say show me this and that to our lot, they can look at past wives and who they dated etc but heaven forbid if they actually did their jobs and reported on this and asked “WHY DO YOU REFUSE TO SHOW IT , WOULD IT NOT BE EASIER TO SHOW IF YOU HAVE IT?”
The Bali angle is new to me....
Oh Good to see you Enterprise!
I don’t know, but for certain Nancy deserves to be prosecuted for Fraud. She certified him, but didn’t certify he was eligible because he ISN’T eligible and she knew it... that’s why she didn’t vet him, she knew he couldn’t meet the requirements. Anyone who covered this up should be in prison as a member of a conspiracy to usurp the office of the President.
But that’s just my opinion. For what ever that’s worth.
Courtesy ping to Polarik
The Duckworth comment was a mistake later retracted by that Newspaper. The comments about the wife in the Philippines is a lose thread that I haven't yet found a way to categorize to my satisfaction. Fred Nerks and I think Mojito Joe (and perhaps others) have mentioned this before, and it just seems like an extra part you might find after you put an engine back in a car. :)
I have to take a few things as demonstrable assumptions, and work from there. I believe Barack shares a bloodline with his Grandfather Stanley because in certain pictures they look almost identical, so I assume that it is a fact he was born either to Stanley or Stanley Ann. I happen to favor the Stanley Ann theory because I believe it has the more supporting evidence.
That being established in my mind, I have to ask myself under what possible circumstances would Stanley Ann be traveling to such a place as Bali, Indonesia, or even Kenya while pregnant with a baby in 1961? The probable answer comes back as not bloody likely. The Cost, the Family Concern, the Reason for going? No sensible reason stands out.
On the other hand, that she would be in North West Washington State in 1961 makes perfect sense. It can be presumed that Grandma Dunham was ashamed of the fact that her Daughter was pregnant by a black man by the fact that she never told her co-workers at the bank that she HAD a grandson. This is not the behavior of a normal grandmother, but it IS the behavior of someone who is ashamed of the fact that her grandson is half black.
So if we accept the notion that Grandma Dunham (and perhaps Grandad too) was ashamed of the fact that their daughter was pregnant by a black man, it is not unreasonable to believe that they urged her to go stay with her Aunt or Uncle in NorthWest Washington.
And so on. THIS narrative sounds plausible, while I cannot think of, nor have I heard of, a good explanation for why and how Stanley could have ended up in any other place but Washington or Hawaii. If anybody comes up with an alternative explanation that makes sense, i'm all ears.
I take off a few hours to write an important story about Romney and what happens? Bang!
I haven’t yet read the subpoena or thread comments, so I’ll reserve my comments until I know the details. I hope this is accurate.
What's missing is the original microfiche (a roll or square page microfilm) where Obama's supposed long form birth certificate has been recorded [Yeah right! - LoL] with many others recorded Hawaiian BCs. However, Taitz as I recall, has sent a court subpoena to the state of Hawaii to produce it. Hee.
There are 3 lawyers who have different plaintiffs vs. Obama all taking a different tacked at going after Obama's eligibility. Variety. :-)
That's right! A victory in Ga. may lead to challenges in other states and raise questions in voters' minds as why Obama is not responding to these torts. He may be thinking that he wouldn't win these state anyway. But failure to respond to more challenges will raise the question "WHY??" even among independents.
And, as Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health, explains, no-one who was born abroad could get a certificate saying they were born in Hawaii.
"If you were born in Bali, for example," Ms Okubo told the Washington Independent, "you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate."
If one was to take a boat from Honolulu, Hawaii, to Mombasa, Kenya, then Bali, Indonsia, could be a port of call along the way. A pregnant Stanley Ann Dunham Obama may have given birth while stopped in Bali. Thus Spokesbabe Okubo may have been telling us that Obama's birth certificate SHOULD say he was born in Bali, but maybe the records were fudged to say Obama was born in Honolulu because the DOH couldn't verify Obama was born in Bali. This is why it is important for the HI DOH to release any and all records pertaining to Obama's birth.
I thought this came up during Bush administration and it was shown a sitting President could not be compelled to attend court hearings (or else that’s all they would ever be doing). Regardless, people on here should be careful what they wish for. Obama can be beat in November but if he doesn’t run, who thinks that Cankles Clinton would be beaten? I think she probably would massacre Newt and certainly Mitt wouldn’t have a chance against her. I’m afraid she would pull in the Senate and House with her.
Oh so now he was born to a single mother.... as if daddy wasn’t married to mommy... gotcha.
Sorry Barry, if Mom and dad were married you aren’t illegitimate.
You already admitted you were born under the jurisdiction of Great Britain.
I hear ya, butterdez ...
TOO MANY cases like this have simply disappeared without a whimper. Lack of standing is the usual cause of death.
HOPEFULLY this one will play out, with popcorn all around on January 26. But I’m not betting the mortgage that the judge won’t “change his mind” or something similarly unexplainable before then.
It’s looking Phat, hawt, and richly buttered.
I have hope for this one.
(Spank) back to studying chemistry for me! I have to go describe polar covalent bonding in Organic molecules...sigh.
The reporter CLAIMS it was his mistake and that he "found" the information about Obama being born on the Internet. But this doesn't exactly add up because everthing else in the story was based on his interview with Tammy Duckworth. Why would a reporter create a fact based on a comment made by the subject of the interview. My bet is that Obama told this to Tammy Duckworth or that maybe she misunderstood that he lived there and was not born there. I know they retracted it, but the explanation just doesn't add up.
I already hold him in contempt.
He doesn’t need standing. He’s allowed to sit on the bench. ;p
Defendant argues hearing in Georgia would interrupt his duties as President.
The famous birther Michelle Obama told us that Obama’s mama was definitely single when “she had him” (which I think is birther slang for “gave birth to”). Of course, she is also the same birther who told us that Kenya is her husband’s home country. I think she knows what she’s talking about. The single SAD had him in Kenya.
Would be nice to see this slime ball go before a judge but it will never happen. Prescient alone says it will never happen.
Seems to me a ruling like this in one state, could set a precedent for other states.
Whoever the idiot was that thought that up, they missed the fact that he wasn’t raised IN KANSAS.
That may well be true, but as much as I would hate to see it, if that's the cost of adhering to the Constitution, so be it.
I think we’re past the lack of standing point in this case. Besides, that’s only a Federal point of law, although states have their own version of legal standing. But, ballot challenges are not based on the same principle as general civil lawsuits.
want to bet this judge has received more than one “friendly” phone call asking him to reconsider?
You reckon ABC news will lead with this story tonite?
“True, but not being included on just one states ballot will open this thing to an entirely new level.”
Yes, the dominoes could fall in all 57 states.
Sorry judge,but our Dear Leader laughs at your antics.
Oh can I steal that???
Your concern is warranted, given the grand scale of professional negligence by our side of the aisle that ushered him into office.
While I do not believe Santorum will be the candidate, the NBC question is whether his father was naturalized prior to the younger's birth.
We haven't talked in a couple of years. Looked at your About page to see if you were the same guy that was on that whiskey distribution wagon. It appears you would enjoy Ron Chernow's Wahington, <$20 at Sam's, if you have not already read it.
We’ll see a blackout kind of like wikipedia did with SOPA.
Ah, but they did. They thought they might be able to screw McCain on a technicality so they tried to say since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone he was not an NBC. Of course, since he was born on a US Military base, his Father was a navy officer (later and admiral I think), and both his parents were NBCs, the charged didn't go anywhere AND, IIRC, he displayed his LFBC on the floor of the Senate.
Can someone please give me a clean link to the most recent Jack Maskell CRS report on President Obama's eligibility, and possibly references to the pages where Minor is discussed and NBC status is defined?
I find this hilarious on multiple levels.
1. The Silly bugger doesn't seem to know how to use the internet.
2. The Silly bugger doesn't seem to know that one of the criticism of the Jack Maskell report is that it didn't deal with Minor v Happersett.
3. The Silly bugger thought *I* was the ignorant\stupid one. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.