Skip to comments.Jerome Corsi and Mara Zebest Debate John Woodman About Obama's Forged Birth Certificate
Posted on 01/22/2012 11:18:00 PM PST by Seizethecarp
John Woodman debates Mara Zebest, Tom Harrison, and Karl Denninger on the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate.
Then, in the second half of hour two, Woodman will debate New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi who is the author of Where's The Real Birth Certificate.
IIRC, Mara Zebest is to appear as a witness for Orly Taitz in GA on Thursday, so this could be an update on her testimony, if the hearing takes place.
The wine skin is slowly being filled up with old wine and soon will deterioate and burst wide open, LOL!!!
Mara’s breakdown of the LFCOLB forgery was ze’best.
He doesn't describe it. Sounds to me like they are keeping it secret for maximum impact.
The next few weeks could be big.
Bottom line, the certificate is a cut and paste hatchet job, and they easily eviscerate the opposition defending it.
I agree. I am hoping that is is admissible evidence from Kenya...maybe including a witness. Hey, I can hope!
Unlike Romney, Gingrich would dare to “go birther” given the right level of evidence and the timing.
Perry, who was backed by Arpaio, is now enthusiastically backing Gingrich and I hope that Arpaio will come out for Gingrich, too...again when the timing is right.
If I am Obama, that's the last thing I want to hear.
I think you are right. Kenyan passport is my guess, between 1971 and 1981, from his home country.
Kenya gets Billions of dollars of US aid, and his cousin holds the money bag when they get the check. Obama campaigned for him. The appearance alone stinks to hell.
However, when he recently lurched off into the rhubarb in favor of the OWS crowd, plus attacks on Palin, Cain, Newt, et al, he became an unbearable, raving, Libertarian loon. I don't like going there any more. You have been warned.
I listened to the full two hours the other day, what a waste of time. The host let Woodman drone on so much. He sounded like an Art Bell guest, uses a lot of words to say very little.
Mr. K got bogged down with him about alignment and kerning. He should have focused on the last digit of the Bates stamp and Stanley’s crafted signature. They would have been harder to explain away.
Butterdezillion was also on the phone, but didn’t get much airtime.
The Fogbowers were giddy when Woodman’s book came out.
I agree. I put it up before I listened to it and was equally disappointed. I expected (wanted) a smack-down of at least some sort of credible claim that the many signs of forgery were explainable.
Glad to hear the Fogbowers were taken in, though...
Mark is such an honest person that he needs to give a person the chance to make their point if they’ve got one. The trouble comes when he’s got a guest who doesn’t have any worthwhile points to make, and that was the situation with John Woodman.
I’ve been meaning to post on my blog to clarify something I did say on that show. I had said that Virginia having died doesn’t impact the BC#. What I should have said was that it wouldn’t make a difference within the context of the alphabetizing theory. If they waited a month, alphabetized the BC’s, and THEN numbered the BC’s as John claims, Virginia’s birth at one hospital and death at another hospital that wrongly reported her name would have no bearing on the number she got, because even that discrepancy with her name would have been resolved by the time they numbered the BC’s anyway.
It actually WOULD make a difference in real life, I believe. Not that she died, but that her death certificate had a different name than her birth certificate. That had to be clarified, which kept an otherwise routine BC from simply being checked for completeness and numbered right away.
Virginia’s genuine long-form probably has a “date filed” of Aug 8, 1961 and a “date accepted” of Aug 11, 1961. Okubo said that when the HDOH went to electronic filing of BC’s they consolidated those dates into one and called it “date filed” on the abbreviated copies. If so, the software had to take one of the 2 dates entered from the old long-forms and use it for the “date filed” on the short-form. If so, the first date from the long-form might have been used, which would be “date filed”. For routine situations where the BC (and/or death certificate) was complete when it was submitted to the HDOH, there would be no discrepancy. IOW, that discrepancy makes sense for Virginia Sunahara because of the death announcement using the wrong name. It makes absolutely no sense for a routine hospital birth like Obama claims.
Do you have links about the last digit of the Bates stamp? What doesn’t make sense to me is why the last digit would have to be messed with, if Virginia’s number was used and her BC was used as the base document for the forgery.