Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Shoot and Kill Elderly Man's Dog (another German Shepherd)
examiner.com ^ | January 26, 2012 | Penny Eims

Posted on 01/26/2012 6:30:56 PM PST by chrisinoc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: USMCWife6869; Indy Pendance; Still German Shepherd; dervish; Kozak; Joe 6-pack; joesnuffy; ...
Sorry this is late, but still somewhat active.

GERMAN SHEPHERD PING LIST

Flora Berkemeyer

This is a low-volume list………so don’t worry!

(Please Freep-mail me if you’d like to be on or off the list.)

41 posted on 01/28/2012 9:59:02 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc

I’m with the German Shepherd writer on this - why was the dog “left behind” outside? (Although, apparently that meant “going in the house”, whereas I think of “leave the scene” to be “get out of this neighborhood”.)

OTOH, I don’t quite get why some cops are so shocked that a dog would bark and growl at him being on her property. Shouldn’t there be some mitigation tried? Note: this is apparently NOT a deadly serious crime scene/chase, so I see no hurry implied by just shooting the dog. But then, why wasn’t the man a witness to be questioned (OK, maybe they did, but it was left out) instead of booted out of there?


42 posted on 01/28/2012 10:07:47 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

“why was the dog “left behind” outside?”

Presumably because the dog was in its own yard and the owner had no inkling that an officer would be “threatened” by his dog. Likely he assumed that the officer would do his job and be on his way, and nothing worse would happen.


43 posted on 01/28/2012 10:11:41 AM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

“The owner likely had no idea that any cop would (claim to) be terrified of a gentle house pet.

“It is the cop’s responsibility to resign from the force since he clearly lacks the mental capacity to act as a peace officer, not the owner’s responsibility to guess all scenarios that are (to his mind) preposterous.”

This is a very poor reaction.

Never mind few ever assume a German Shepherd is a “gentle” house pet. (1 of the reasons I love them; their mere presence scares people and keeps them out of your business.)

You are responsible for your dog. If s/he bites someone, it’s on you. Would you honestly say the man didn’t need to take the dog in (i.e., control her) if a postman walked up, a UPS man, a neighbor? If she should do anything negative, even on your property, even if it’s logical for a dog, you’re in big danger of a nice lawsuit. Why wouldn’t that apply to cops also? The only difference is you know the cop has a gun. But that is no excuse.


44 posted on 01/28/2012 10:19:56 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

This dog was on its own property. So long as it did not wander off the property, it was secured.

I have known several German shepherds; while they can be very protective, all of them which I have known were friendly, sociable and gentle animals (with decent, law-abiding citizens).

I would have had no problem with holding the man responsible if his dog had bitten the officer. However, that isn’t the case here.

We don’t have a problem with an unrestrained dog, here.

We have a problem with an unrestrained cop.


45 posted on 01/28/2012 10:26:08 AM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

I know German Shepherds pretty well. I happen to love them - that’s why I run the ping list. Reality: people are scared of GS, and there is a reason for that, even if it’s just because they’re in MIL/police duty all the time. Even if the dog is a dope (like mine), a scared person can trigger protective instincts, just because (”ah, you must be guilty then”).

The dog didn’t bite the officer YET - but may have. He was (theoretically) protecting himself. Again, only difference is a gun. If your neighbor had a gun while he was walking up to pay you a social visit, and was charged by this dog repeatedly, he may’ve shot him, too, before an actual bite. What then?

Point is, a dog may bite someone. I already stated it DOESN’T MATTER if it’s his/your property - you are going to get slapped with a lawsuit. It may fall through as not your fault, but it will be there, period, with all the inconveniences and nuisance.

Likewise, loose on open property is not “secure”. There needs to be a fence, etc. Apparently there wasn’t.

Bottom line: always makes sense to truly control your dog and bring her with you.


46 posted on 01/28/2012 10:44:40 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

We don’t know that the dog charged anyone. That’s the officer’s side of the story, and the officer’s side of the story includes statements that the dog’s owner insists he never made.

One of the sides is lying about the circumstances. The question is, do we assume that the officer who shot the dog is being truthful about the circumstances, or do we assume that the law-abiding owner is being truthful about the circumstances?


47 posted on 01/28/2012 11:01:59 AM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Your magnificent dog has nothing to fear.

A cop would never be able to get off a shot.... he’d be too busy screaming “mommy, mommy”, while running 100 mph in the opposite direction. ;>)

People need not fear my German Shepherd dog, it is me that could send them to hell.

My “attack geese” can not be bribed nor negotiated with, it is they that will put fear in the heart of any man. LOL

As an aside, today would be a bad day to screw around with my boy. He had surgery yesterday and his isn’t one bit happy about it.


48 posted on 01/28/2012 11:25:49 AM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

“it is me that could send them to hell.”

Yup.

Them’s the bettin’ odds here, too because frankly, I’d rather risk my self than my dog.

;]

I had 3 attack geese.

Bob T Gander [T for Tiberius] was the honking, pinching, flopping scourge of all who dared walk these grounds.

He even beat up on my goats.

What a foul fowl he was.

[Gert was a sweetheart and Lucy was a slattern who tricked Lucy into sitting on *all* the eggs]

I miss those crazy birds.


49 posted on 01/28/2012 11:41:14 AM PST by Salamander (If I'm too rough, tell me.....I'm so scared your little head will come off in my hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

I wish you guys were neighbors.... it would be fun.


50 posted on 01/28/2012 11:54:05 AM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc; the OlLine Rebel; Chode

Badge or no badge, woe be the person who shoots my GDS.


51 posted on 01/28/2012 12:49:23 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
damn straight, but my question still stands... what the hell is this, some kind of sick initiation rite of passage into the doughnut eater club or something???

this is getting out of hand, once is an accident, twice is coincidence, every time is BULLSH!T!!!

52 posted on 01/28/2012 1:38:59 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Chode
When dog owners start shooting back, cops will think twice.

What's next, cops shoot your kids because they acted threatening?

53 posted on 01/28/2012 1:45:31 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Altariel

I expect people not to be idiots. I expect that people know that cops protect themselves and shoot innocent people and dogs first and ask questions or think later. I expect that people are responsible enough to know gun laws of places they visit.


54 posted on 01/28/2012 1:50:10 PM PST by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
1)absolutely... 2)wouldn't surprise me
55 posted on 01/28/2012 1:58:14 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

In some places, you shoot a dog like that you’ll get shot yerself. Badge or no badge. Just sayin...


56 posted on 01/28/2012 2:10:26 PM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

I wouldn’t consider ignorance of the recent phenomenon of cops shooting dogs worthy of labeling someone “idiot”.

The man was on his own property. The dog was on its own property. The man has probably thought of police officers as peace officers his whole life (and until they started calling themselves law enforcement officers, they were and acted like peace officers) and did not think he had anything to worry about.

Most of these “oop shoots dog” stories only become known at the local level. Most people are not Freepers and are not as well informed. Some compassion for decent, law-abiding folks who are victims of bad cops is warranted, I think.


57 posted on 01/28/2012 5:40:43 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson