Posted on 01/30/2012 2:22:24 PM PST by Music Producer
Haskins (AKA Music Producer) is the gentleman you’re responding to.
“It is the understanding of the first two attorneys to present their cases that, whichever way the judge decides will ultimately result in an appeal, and with their evidence being presented, they have prepared their cases to proceed to the highest court in the land, if necessary.”
No!
An appeal will be to Georgia Superior Court and it will be de novo (fresh start, new case). Evidence and testimony will have to be introduced, again.
The Administrative Hearing is a function of the Georgia legislative branch. Georgia Superior Court is a function of the Georgia Judicial branch. Obama and his attorney know this and are not worried about a default judgement which will result in the GA SoS taking Obama off the Georgia Preferential Ballot. They’ll appeal the GA SoS’s action and new trial will be held in Georgia Superior Court, de novo.
AMEN!
AMEN!
If he had educated himself on our Constitution and stood his ground (instead of caving like a coward) he would be leading in the polls.
Heck....If a few field grade officers resigned their commissions in protest, I think the jig would be up.
Obama will resign before he is frog-marched out of the whitehouse.
Kleon has been one of the resident rolls here for some time.
Ignore the desparate!
LOLOLOLOL!!
For once, I agree with you, sweetie!
Orly violated every single rule taught about courtroom behavior in a first year law school trial advocacy class. I was appalled that she knew so little of the procedures and tactics, but also at her lack of organization, and her inability to perceive how she comes across.
She also does not learn from her mistakes, and keeps thinking that she only has to convince herself, and not the judge or the public at large.
She has never been taught cadence in her speaking or to tailor her speech to the ability to listen to a foreign accent (even if she understands herself), and she does not project the calm necessary to allow her words speak to the listener.
She makes it impossible for a listener to think of anything other than the voice, the accent, the sloppy and haphazard speech patterns, and the baggage of too much emotion.
She needs to step out of the role and let someone else handle the case, that is, unless, the effect that she is garnering is the effect she desires.
She acts like a Trojan horse, and sounds like a bleating goat, regardless of her motives or the color of her heart.
That doesn’t count.
For some reason...
“Birtherism” had little if anything to do Governor Perry's failure. I had no idea he ever made any comments regarding Obama’s eligibility. I would lay the blame for his failure more squarely on the feet on his debate performances and his nasty, mean spirited, know-it-all supporters who managed to offend just about everyone everywhere. And you are managing to keep up the good work still I see. Congratulations! Who are you supporting now?Maybe we should warn them?
She is a mole ... whack-a-mole, that is. And on top of that, she’s an incompetent, lunatic, attention whore running a freak show that distracts from the serious nature of the underlying Constitutional question.
But I’ve been sayin’ that goin’ on three years now and it ain’t made no nevermind to this point.
We might need a Sanity Squad drinking game. Every time Orly says “I,” you drink. She’s as bad as Obama with the “me, myself, and I” routine.
After one court hearing, we’d be knee-crawlin’, snot-slingin’, commode-huggin’ drunk until 2014.
We might need a Sanity Squad drinking game. Every time Orly says “I,” you drink. She’s as bad as Obama with the “me, myself, and I” routine.
After one court hearing, we’d be knee-crawlin’, snot-slingin’, commode-huggin’ drunk until 2014.
every time she says uh would be quicker...
Exactly.
Well, I do have FReeping to do. I can’t incapacitate myself. ;p
The problem with that theory is that one can argue the absolutely undeniable fact that a subpoena downloaded from the website of an ALJ in GA carries no force and has no effect upon the Hawaii DoH and still end up saying "we agree to disagree" about what is a fact. Sad, but true.
Two professional and credible witnesses have testified under oath in an administrative court during an administrative hearing in Georgia that Obama’s SSN# appears to be fraudulent.
Does Obama have a tax attorney? Does this tax attorney know about these claims of fraud? Does this tax attorney have an obligation to ask Obama if he is using a stolen SSN#?
Does this attorney have any liability if he has been informed of possible fraud? Is this attorney willing to submit Obama’s tax forms this year?
Tides turn, public mood shifts, power changes hands, information previously unavailable suddenly becomes available. Those who think they are protected will find themselves without protection.
Who else wants to go down on the S.S. Obama?
I don’t think an Obama supporter would attack Orly while providing support for the other plaintiffs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.