Skip to comments.Not the media the Democrats or the Republicans will challenge Obama’s eligibility so we have to
Posted on 02/01/2012 6:52:59 AM PST by jmaroneps37
Stand up and fight or we can lose this fight.
A grassroots internet effort is happening this week to blast fax each states Secretary of State with thousands of requests to take Barack Obamas name off of their states presidential election ballot because he is not Constitutionally eligible to serve as our president.
Coming on the heels of the explosive eligibility hearing in the courtroom of Judge Michael Malihi, this citizens effort is being led by RightMarch.com.
RightMarch recognizes we have to take up our own cause to see that only eligible candidates get on our 2012 election ballots because clearly, an omerta or code of silence is preventing our Congress state legislators or our Supreme Court from looking into this matter.
Long ago we realized we could no longer depend on our countrys media to provide us with the information we need in this matter. Even a blackout of news on Obamas eligibility exists on talk radio. Have you heard much about the Georgia case on your favorite show?
With a decision expected this week from Judge Maliki, inside information is hinting on a default judgment due to the fact that both Barack Obama and his attorney Michael Jablonski simply ignored a direct court order to appear and testify in front of citizen plaintiffs.
The sample [fax RightMarch or you can send to your] Secretary of State: Jurisdiction falls squarely on your shoulders as head of the States office that conducts elections, and it is your sworn duty as a person of honor and a public servant to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.
The primary obstacle to Obamas eligibility is the natural born citizen requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 which states both parents must be born in our country
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Link doesn’t work...
somehow the link got corrupted but this one works.
Unfortunately this condition existed prior to the 2008 elections and the most damning piece of evidence in the Georgia court case was common knowledge at that time.
What evidence you ask?
Obama’s personally (according the LMSM) written words.
But then, taking action then, as it will be in the future, will be immediately branded as a simple racist act by the liberal-progressive-socalist-democrat faction.
BTW - Obama supporters (perhaps at Obama’s direction) attempted to disqualify John McCain but was defeated by the Senate in their recorded statement that John McCain was a natural born citizen. To this day I wonder why the Senate took such extraordinary action to declare McCain a natural born citizen (McCain's citizenship was never in question and even if it was the legal basis of his natural born citizenship was much MUCH stronger than Obama’s) and did nothing for Obama. After all, wouldn't it have been “fare” to do so?
Anyone in GA have an update........?
Thanks in advance.
They didn’t make the declaration for Obama because they knew he wan’t an NBC.
Coach is usually right
So can we start a SuperPac?
Hillary and zero’s approval of McCain should have been a red flag warning by itself that McCain was not a good candidate for us.
I keep wondering, at what point will the USSC finally do something? Even if it’s a whitewash or a coverup? Will a Georgia court shame the USSC into taking a case?
Today is the last day he will take court filings from all the parties that he moved up from the 5th of Feb. No one knows when Mahili will decide when, but probably within a few days.
That was a classic "dog that didn't bark" moment in U.S. history. And highly significant that the senate bill declared McCain a natural born Citizen because he was born to citizen parents [plural].
But Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 actually says:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The word “parent” does not occur there. Or anywhere in the Constitution for that matter. http://constitution.org/constit_.htm. Maybe the author didn't actually read the document he is citing?
The definition of Natural Born Citizen has never been taken up by the USSC, so effectively there is no legal definition - only competing opinions. The most interesting part of Obama’s strategy of ignoring Georgia and fighting this in Federal court is that maybe this issue will be finally addressed and legally defined. That would be nice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.