Skip to comments.Hatfield's Findings of Fact Submitted
Posted on 02/01/2012 8:07:42 PM PST by jdirt
Mr. Hatfield submitted 3 briefs; contempt, minor v happersett, findings and fact.
Definition of CONTUMACY
The refusal or intentional omission of a person who has been duly cited before a court to appear and defend the charge laid against him, or, if he is duly before the court, to obey some lawful order or direction made in the cause. In the former case it is called presumed contumacy; in the latter, actual. The term is chietly used in ecclesiastical law. See 3 Curt. Ecc. 1.
Yesterday's post at Liberty Legal Foundation:
Judge Malihi moved the deadline for filing our legal briefs up to today, so today we filed two documents with Georgias Office of State Administrative Hearings. We expect Judge Malihi to rule promptly on this matter. As soon as he does, we will let you know both what his ruling is and what it means.
The first filing was our Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. This is written as a proposed order in the Judges voice, but it is not his order. This filing is written in this way to show how we would like the Judge to rule on the evidence and arguments we presented last Thursday in Atlanta. We showed that Obamas father was never a citizen via several documents. We then showed Supreme Court precedent that natural born citizen requires two citizen parents at the time the candidate was born. We therefore propose a ruling that Obama is not Constitutionally qualified to be on the Georgia ballot for the office of President.
The second filing today was a Motion for Finding of Contempt against Obama. My message last week, Is the Judicial Branch Dead?, covered the implications of Obamas actions last week. Never before in our history have we had a President simply ignore a court order. We have had Presidents subject to a court order more than once, but in every one of those instances, the President in question followed lawful procedure in dealing with those orders. We now have a sitting President that has openly declared that he is not subject to the Judicial Branch of our government. This is dangerous territory and our Motion urges Judge Malihi to recommend that the Superior Court find the Defendant in willful contempt of Court, and that the Superior Court impose sanctions commensurate with an act that threatens the foundations of our Constitutional Republic.
Well done Hatfield!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.