Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 02/02/2012 6:33:27 PM PST by Paul Pierett
Good afternoon. David's friend and chief meteorologist of the Power of 5 weather network at WEWS Cleveland, Mark Johnson, has recently been drawing fire for his claims, “Earth hasn’t warmed in 15 years” story on newsnet5.com (http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/weather/weather_news/United-Kingdom-Meteorology-Office-declares-Earth-hasnt-warmed-in-15-years). The group, “thinkprogress.org”, began the criticism. The group “Forecast the Facts” on Facebook, (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Forecast-the-Facts/290379014343508) also joined in the crusade.
Just when things were just staying on one meteorologist, they decided to go after another Cleveland meteorologist, WJW FOX 8 weather, Andre Bernier. Andre’s story related to the same topic titled, “Serious global…COOLING?” (http://andrebernier.com/?p=430).
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I had the same confrontation with the Gorians on Yahoo Answers. "They Are Here!" It will take the next 20 years of severed global cooling to get them off thread.
Paul Pierett
There will be one, and only one, voice speaking about the undeniable Truth about Human Caused Catastrophic Climate Change.
And when the people have only the Truth, they will think Truth.
If real science supported the alarmists, they would not have resorted to both fraud and the destruction of tens of thousands of historical temperature readings.
No one can duplicate their work. The entire support for real science is the ability to verify/repeat scientific proof of a theory.
Which is no longer possible.
I was thinking of the afterword to 1984. The warmists have destroyed all dissenting data, and are coming after individuals who disagree.
If successful, no one will have the tools to argue against them, nor the platform from which to speak.
bookmark bump
bttt
It's baaack! The plan to kill talk radio
Global Warming on Free Republic
Ah, very well stated...I was about to have to RAWR, but instead I will /respect.
Every that works for that sight would make Joseph Goebbels look like an amateur.
I remember years back reading about that Soros helped fund it's start.
The stuff I read in the past published there about Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT was beyond sickening. He is a wonderfully humble and brilliant scientist.
He has had to endure death threats because of sites like Real Climate inciting the freaks on the left to go nuts about the fraud of AGW
On ABC “World News Tonight” a few days ago, Sam Champion, the moonbat homosexual weatherman from “Good Morning America,” announced that the harsh winter in Serbia was due to “man made global warming.” What a load of BS.
He funds it almost directly ongoing: Soros -> Fenton Communications -> Real Climate. Real Climate is written by Mike Mann among others and probably funnels money to him. OTOH, Mann was just elected fellow in the AGU, their highest honor, so the fraud runs deep everywhere in the scientific establishment.
Having read alot at RC years ago I found it to be a seminar site. They would let some "deniers" rant and rave (there are plenty of those) but censor (and even maliciously edit) critiques by legitimate scientists. The goal was to portray the other wide as unscientific. To a large extent this has worked. There is also a lot of unscientific nonsense posted here, basically fringe theories that have little scientific support. It's too bad because as Pat Michaels just pointed out http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=14073, there is agreement on the basic science of carbon dioxide warming, and
Finally "more than 97% of all actively publishing* climate scientists agree that climate change is real and human caused" is probably an underestimate, as virtually everyone acknowledges that the surface temperature is warmer than it was, and that multifarious human activities have some influence on climate. Rather, he misses the point well-made by the original Journal article, which is that the rise in surface temperature is clearly below the values first forecast by the UN in 1990. The core—unsettled—issue in climate science is the "sensitivity" of temperature to carbon dioxide, and there are several independent lines of evidence, including the surface temperature history and the water vapor problems, that argue that it has been substantially overestimated.
What is RAWR?
Government funded environmental science, increasingly has become the equivalent of the old Soviet political officer the “Zampolit”, whose job was exclusively to enforce political correctness.
It’s an internet ROAR!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.