Skip to comments.
Colonizing the Moon
New Papyrus Magazine ^
| AUGUST 27, 2009
| Marcel F. Williams
Posted on 02/03/2012 11:43:04 AM PST by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Since this is from a blog (not my personal blog BTW), I posted the entire article. New Papyrus is "the online magazine of science, technology, socioeconomics and politics."
There is a video at the source.
I post this because of its pertinence to Newt's recent comments on the space coast in FL. Furthermore, I thought it was an interesting article.
To: RoosterRedux
The US government should sell real estate on the moon. If you can get there and claim the land, then you should have full title and ownership of it for a minimal cost. The land should be seen as US territory, and be subject to US taxation, with the US military standing ready to guard against invaders.
I think this would violate international law -- but who cares?
2
posted on
02/03/2012 11:49:44 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(When the night falls, it falls on me, and when the day breaks I'm in pieces.)
To: RoosterRedux
Nobody here gets it.
Asteroid 1986 DA, just to pick one, contains over 10,000 tons of gold and 100,000 tons of platinum. All of the metals in that body, if delivered in 2010, would have had a value of over $25 trillion. The Moon could contain strikes of similar value. Why has nobody sought this profit?
Nobody looks at the legal blockade to extraterrestrial profits, because they don't even know it exists. The Johnson administration managed to export the principals of socialism to the entirety of space:
"The exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind." Article I of The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies of 1967.
Ferdinand and Isabella gave Columbus a few sheckles, but it took quite some time before finance evolved enough to put together profit making ventures that yielded boatloads of gold. It is time for us to free space from socialism and allow the cornerston to free enterprise - private property.
I do not favor any large government expenditures for Solyndra on the Moon. I just wish that when the debate tries to revive the excitement of Apollo, that SOMEBODY would say the Outer Space Treaty makes for profit investment IMPOSSIBLE.
Withdraw from the Treaty.
3
posted on
02/03/2012 11:51:26 AM PST
by
frithguild
(Withdraw from the 1967 Treaty on Outer Space. It bans private property and profits.)
To: frithguild
Spain's approach to this problem was much better than LBJ's approach.
4
posted on
02/03/2012 11:58:45 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(When the night falls, it falls on me, and when the day breaks I'm in pieces.)
To: RoosterRedux
While I agree that NASA should be looking up and out, I still think Mars is a better target than the Moon.
(1) Higher gravity. It has twice the gravity of the Moon so there is a better chance that humans can live there long term.
(2) The ability to live off the land. Mars has everything you need to make air, water and rocket fuel either in the atmosphere or a few inches under the soil. You can do a lot more when you don't have to haul all the basic needs of life with you.
(3) Less surface radiation. Mars's atmosphere blocks out solar radiation. You still get cosmic rays, but those take years of time outside the shelter to build up. On the moon one solar flare while you aren't under cover and you are at a lethal dose in minutes.
(4) Lunar regolith is nasty stuff. It is like powdered glass only more abrasive. Equipment failures on a moon base are going to be a real problem due to dust contamination. Now Mars has a lot of dust too. But wind erosion tends to round off the grains. So it isn't much worse than desert sand here on Earth. And we have a lot of experience developing equipment to deal with sand contamination.
(5) Normal day/night cycle. A sol on Mars is only a few minutes longer than a day on Earth. So while the solar cells are less efficient, they only have to last through 12 hours and 19 minutes of darkness. On the Moon the solar panels are much more efficient, but the batteries have to last through 14 days of absolute darkness.
5
posted on
02/03/2012 12:01:39 PM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: RoosterRedux
To: Revolting cat!
Yowie! Those moonchicks are fugly!;-)
7
posted on
02/03/2012 12:06:12 PM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
To: RoosterRedux
Imagine if we had started building a moon base in the 1970’s.
8
posted on
02/03/2012 12:06:14 PM PST
by
dainbramaged
(I lost my mantra around 1969.)
To: RoosterRedux
Are these any better?
To: Revolting cat!
Here's my idea of a moonchick...
10
posted on
02/03/2012 12:09:46 PM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
To: RoosterRedux
Here are real Moon people!
To: RoosterRedux
Mankinds destiny lay in the stars.
To: RoosterRedux
The idea of manned space explorations is nothing but a blatant attempt to woo votes from the government employees and government contractor employees in the aerospace industry. It’s a complete waste of money. There is no conceivable material on the moon or any other exotic location in the solar system that is worth the cost of getting it.
13
posted on
02/03/2012 12:21:41 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
Oh yeah!
Well, I heard the universe is really flat and when you go over the edge, you fall into a black hole!;-)
And if that weren't bad enough, there's no cell phone service in a black hole.
14
posted on
02/03/2012 12:31:41 PM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
To: from occupied ga
And your proof of this theoretical analysis is ...?
If it's here on Earth, it's found throughout the cosmos.
What's the asteroids, moon and Mars made of? Pixie dust?
15
posted on
02/03/2012 12:32:09 PM PST
by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(Geithner: Taxes on 'Small Business' Must Rise So Government Doesn't 'Shrink')
To: RoosterRedux
This discussion is all academic anyway because NASA has forgotten how to build moon rockets.
The Lost Art of the Saturn V
We can't get there anymore!
16
posted on
02/03/2012 12:43:07 PM PST
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: from occupied ga
For Instance:
Subtly Shaded Map of Moon Reveals Titanium Treasure Troves
Ever hear of a Nickle-Iron Asteroid? Carbon Asteroids? Water on the Moon? Water on Mars?
The Moon is full of silica's for glass, Iron and far more that have built up from billions of years of bombardments.
The notion that none of these elements exists in space is ludicrous.
It's thought that some of the richest iron and copper deposits on Earth were put here for our use by asteroid impacts.
Just a thought.
17
posted on
02/03/2012 12:43:30 PM PST
by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(Geithner: Taxes on 'Small Business' Must Rise So Government Doesn't 'Shrink')
To: HeartlandOfAmerica; RoosterRedux
Y'all don't understand chemistry do you? I know what's there because I know what
this is. It's the same on the moon, on mars, in Andromeda, and in the most remote galaxies seen by Hubble.
18
posted on
02/03/2012 12:45:15 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: HeartlandOfAmerica
Water on Mars? Ever hear of economics? he Apollo program cost $24 billion in 1970 dollars and brought back 841 lb of moon rocks. It they could have brought more back they would have. SO that works out to about $1783000 per OUNCE for moon rocks. How much do you think iron and silica are worth?
19
posted on
02/03/2012 12:48:42 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: RoosterRedux
How about this one?
20
posted on
02/03/2012 12:49:19 PM PST
by
EEGator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson