Posted on 02/03/2012 2:19:38 PM PST by GregNH
We just spoke with plaintiff Kevin Powell and he reports Judge Malihi has ruled against the Plaintiffs and stated in his order that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore Obama is a natural born Citizen.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
I’m breathing just fine.
I find it amusing watching justices bend down to the great Obama.
No twisted or tortured logic is too great for them to allow a halfrican, usurper to continue his reign.
I’m embarrassed for them. Uphold the Constitution. Sure.
About two years ago, FReeper BP2 said that an anchor baby could one day run for president. You agree, right? It just doesn’t seem “right”.
“So we are now officially Zimbabwe.”
Nah, we also need a few more Quantitative Easing actions on the currency first. We’re definitely on the cusp, however.
“I’m embarrassed for them. Uphold the Constitution. Sure.”
They have. And comparing writings, it’s obvious they respect the Constitution far more than you.
We’re going to end up being WORSE than Zimbabwe...0babwe? Not a good way to start the weekend. Or any day for that matter.
Lawyer speak. Nothing less.
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
:) Now that’s funny.
If the judge had a family, you can just write this one off as another Chicago Way success for the little bassturd in the White Hut.
You are dead wrong. My daughter was born in the USA to a foreign citizen. She is a dual citizen at birth and she is subject to the sovereignty of two countries. Just like Obama. She is legaly recognized as a Born Dual Citizen in her "home" country, and a natural born citizen in the USA , per this decision.
This ruling means she can run for president and govern for the interests of two countries, carry several passports, serve in a foreign military, and like a million other dual citizens run for US President. It's official now, we accept dual citizens into the presidency.
This judge, himself, in a previous ruling stated that the burden of proof is on the candidate. The candidate supplied NOTHING. No evidence whatsoever.
A stipulation for sake of argument is not proof. The judge might have said that he rejected Irion’s argument about Minor, concluding that if a candidate was born in the USA to at least one U.S. citizen, then that candidate would be a natural born citizen. However, he should then have gone on to state that candidate Obama did not meet his burden of proof that he was born in the USA to even one US citizen, because he offered no evidence at all.
Correct.
More than a few FReepers have now figured out why Obama’s lawyer skipped that hearing last week. Why should he have wasted a trip?
Judge Malihi was bought and paid for from the get go. Or threatened.
“All this nonsense about his parent’s citizenship is just that—irrelevant.”
You presume to know how SCOTUS will ultimately define/reconfirm the definition of NBC. I do not. I am content to see what happens.
We agree that the HI DOH birth records “released” for Barry are bogus. Barry has been fighting tooth and nail to prevent a trial on the merits which would enter his HI DOH LFBC image into a court record as a “finding of fact.”
Something on that HI LFBC is extremely damaging to Barry’s eligibility...such as EVERYTHING?
I hear ya FRiend, I do...
This ruling means that the judge is corrupt. He ruled based upon what he was sent, outside of the court preceedings, and that so the plaintiffs could not address the Ankeny ruling and perhaps refute it. The judge was workign for little barry bassturd all along, so the presentments didn’tmean a damned thing with a corrupt judge.
Thank you for the emotionally devoid opinion. Very basic to grasp.
My personal opinion that is also devoid of emotion and is basic to grasp is that the judge is compromised.
Trouble is, Wong Kim Ark didn’t use the common law in effect at the time of the writing of the Constitution, but what the court cherry-picked from recent rulings in Britain without any support from documentation of the American Revolutionary period.
What is ridiculous is that the probative value of the testimony that was rushed through was found faulty but the probative value of an online image was not found faulty.
The other issue that it seems Hatfield may take up is who has the burden of proof. It is not up to the plaintiffs to prove that Obama is ineligible, but up to Obama to prove that he IS eligible. How can he do that without presenting ANYTHING? I’m afraid Hatfield and Irion have shot themselves in the foot by presenting the online image as if it could be probative, but we’ll see what happens on appeal, I guess.
This problem is more than likely not going to be solved in the courts because they are too badly compromised. That’s why the retired military guys told Lakin to not push the issue. They’d get bad results from a compromised system.
If we’re going to get relief from this fraud it’s gonna have to come through law enforcement - in a CRIMINAL trial, where expert witnesses are presented, the investigation includes subpoenas, etc.
Paging Sheriff Arpaio... Paging Sheriff Arpaio... ;o)
Posters write of race riots and burning cities should the black liar be removed for his criminality. That is as racist as anything we've seen since the KKK had a credible voice in American politics. Sadly, people cannot see that black people are part of the now endentured populace and race riots were not a credible threat, regardless of how well david axelbastard floated the notion via his shills.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.